The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 214-222

  Tu, Shengxian ^a   Holm, Niels R ^b   Koning, Gerhard ^a   Maeng, Michael ^b   Reiber, Johan H C ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

bifurcation; three dimensional reconstruction; X ray coronary angiography

Indexed keywords

ACQUISITION ANGLE DIFFERENCE; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AORTA BIFURCATION; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHANTOM; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STENOSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ARTIFACTS; COPPER; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SILICONES; ZINC;

EID: 79960744106     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23047     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Wahle A, Lopez JJ, Olszewski ME, et al. Plaque development, vessel curvature, and wall shear stress in coronary arteries assessed by X-ray angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Med Image Anal 2006; 10: 615-631. (Pubitemid 44161149)
2. Tu S, Huang Z, Koning G, et al. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 76: 291-298.
3. Gollapudi RR, Valencia R, Lee SS, et al. Utility of three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary angiography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 69: 479-482. (Pubitemid 46363846)
4. Rittger H, Schertel B, Schmidt M, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction allows accurate quantification and length measurements of coronary artery stenoses. EuroIntervention 2009; 5: 127-132.
5. Green NE, Chen SY, Hansgen AR, et al. Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: A three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 64: 451-459. (Pubitemid 40463442)
6. Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, Kooijman CJ, et al. Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation 1985; 71: 280-288. (Pubitemid 15157088)
7. Reiber JHC, Tuinenburg JC, Koning G, et al. Quantitative coronary arteriography, Chapter 2.2. In:, Oudkerk M, Reiser MF, editors. Coronary Radiology, 2nd Revised ed., Series: Medical Radiology. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2009. pp 41-65.
8. Koning G, Hekking E, Kemppainen JS, et al. Suitability of the Cordis Stabilizer™ marker guide wire for quantitative coronary angiography calibration: An in vitro and in vivo study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 52: 334-341. (Pubitemid 32184880)
9. Tu S, Koning G, Jukema W, et al. Assessment of obstruction length and optimal viewing angle from biplane X-ray angiograms. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 26: 5-17.
10. Girasis C, Serruys PW, Onuma Y, et al. 3-Dimensional bifurcation angle analysis in patients with left main disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 41-48.
11. Tu S, Hao P, Koning G, et al. In-vivo assessment of optimal viewing angles from X-ray coronary angiography. EuroIntervention, in press.
12. Louvard Y, Thomas M, Dzavik V, et al. Classification of coronary artery bifurcation lesions and treatments: Time for a consensus! Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 71: 175-83. (Pubitemid 351293761)
13. Brown BG, Bolson E, Frimer M, et al. Quantitative coronary angiography: Estimation of dimensions, hemodynamic resistance, and atheroma mass of coronary artery lesions using arteriography in 256 nonoperated patients. Circulation 1977; 55: 329-337. (Pubitemid 8031071)
14. Janssen JP, Rares A, Tuinenburg JC, et al. New approaches for the assessment of vessel sizes in quantitative (cardio-) vascular X-ray analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 26: 259-271.
15. Lansky A, Tuinenburg J, Costa M, et al. Quantitative angiographic methods for bifurcation lesions: A consensus statement from the European bifurcation group. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 73: 258-266.
16. Holm NR, Højdahl H, Lassen JF, et al. Quantitative coronary analysis in the Nordic bifurcation studies. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-010-9715-z.
17. Tu S, Holm NR, Koning G, Huang Z, Reiber JH,. Fusion of 3D QCA and IVUS/OCT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 27: 197-207.
18. Arbab-Zadeh A, Texter J, Ostbye KM, et al. Quantification of lumen stenoses with known dimensions by conventional angiography and computed tomography: Implications of using conventional angiography as gold standard. Heart 2010; 96: 1358-1363.