A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 291-298

  Tu, Shengxian ^a,b   Huang, Zheng ^c   Koning, Gerhard ^a,b   Cui, Kai ^c   Reiber, Johan H C ^a,b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Medis Medical Imaging Systems bv   (Netherlands)

^c SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Intervention; Intravascular ultrasound; Quantitative coronary angiography; Stent

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

AGED; CHINA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOFTWARE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 77955136837     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22502     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Dumay AM, Reiber JHC, Gerbrands JJ. Determination of optimal angiographic viewing angles: Basic principles and evaluation study. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13:13-24.
2. Green NE, Chen SY, Hansgen AR, et al. Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: A three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;64:451-459.
3. Schuurbiers JC, Lopez NG, Ligthart J, et al. In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;73:620-626.
4. Wahle A, Wellnhofer E, Mugaragu I, et al. Assessment of diffuse coronary artery disease by quantitative analysis of coronary morphology based upon 3-D reconstruction from biplane angiograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1995;14:230-241.
5. Gollapudi RR, Valencia R, Lee SS, et al. Utility of three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary angiography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69:479-482. (Pubitemid 46363846)
6. Rittger H, Schertel B, Schmidt M, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction allows accurate quantification and length measurements of coronary artery stenoses. EuroIntervention 2009;5:127-132.
7. Bruining N, Tanimoto S, Otsuka M, et al. Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a bioabsorbable poly-L-lactid acid stent design in the acute phase: A comparison between 2 and 3DQCA. QCU and QMSCT-CA. EuroIntervention 2008;4:285-291.
8. Tu S, Koning G, Jukema W, et al. Assessment of obstruction length and optimal viewing angle from biplane X-ray angiograms. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;26:5-17.
9. Koning G, Hekking E, Kemppainen JS, et al. Suitability of the Cordis StabilizerTM marker guide wire for quantitative coronary angiography calibration: An in vitro and in vivo study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;52:334-341. (Pubitemid 32184880)
10. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, et al. American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1478-1492. (Pubitemid 32295620)
11. Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, Kooijman CJ, et al. Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation 1985;71:280-288.
12. Janssen JP, Koning G, De Koning PJH, et al. A new approach to contour detection in X-ray arteriograms: The wavecontour. Invest Radiol 2005;40:514-520. (Pubitemid 41040688)
13. Reiber JHC, Zwet PM van der, Koning G, et al. Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: Observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;28:187-198.
14. Tu S, Koning G, Tuinenburg JC, et al. Coronary angiography enhancement for visualization. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:657-667.
15. Sapidis N, Farin G. Automatic fairing algorithm for B-spline curves. Comput-Aided Des 1990;22:121-129.
16. Dijkstra J, Koing G, Reiber JHC. Quantitative measurements in IVUS images. Int J Cardiac Imaging 1999;15:513-522.
17. Costa MA, Angiolillo DJ, Tannenbaum M, et al. Impact of stent deployment procedural factors on long-term effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (final results of the multicenter prospective STLLR trial). Am J Cardiol 2008;101:1704-1711.
18. Lemos PA, Saia F, Ligthart JM, et al. Coronary restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: Morphological description and mechanistic analysis from a consecutive series of cases. Circulation 2003;108:257-260.
19. Aminian A, Kabir T, Eeckhout E. Treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis: An emerging challenge. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;74:108-116.
20. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1315-1323.
21. Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, et al. A polymer-based, paclitaxel- eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2004;350:221-231.
22. Stone GW, Moses JW, Ellis SG, et al. Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med 2007;356:998-1008.
23. Fujii K, Carlier SG, Mintz GS, et al. Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: An intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:995-998.
24. Finn AV, Kolodgie FD, Harnek J, et al. Differential response of delayed healing and persistent inflammation at sites of overlap sirolimus-or paclitaxel-eluting stents. Circulation 2005;112:270-278.
25. Colombo A, Stankovic G, Moses JW. Selection of coronary stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1021-1033.
26. Reiber JHC, Koning G, Tuinenburg JC, et al. Quantitative coronary arteriography. In: Oudkerk M, Reiser MF, editors. Coronary Radiology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2004. pp 41-58.
27. Goktekin O, Kaplan S, Dimopoulos K, et al. A new quantitative analysis system for the evaluation of coronary bifurcation lesions: Comparison with current conventional methods. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69:172-180. (Pubitemid 46214248)
28. Rotger D, Radeva P, Canero C, et al. Corresponding IVUS and angiogram image data. Proc Comput Cardiol 2001;28:273-276. (Pubitemid 34167121)
29. Tu S, Koning G, Zheng H, et al. Coronary intervention planning by fusing angiogram and IVUS. Presented at Dutch Society for Pattern Recognition and Image Processing, Leiden, November 16, 2009.
30. Tanaka K, Carlier SG, Mintz GS, et al. The accuracy of length measurements using different intravascular ultrasound motorized transducer pullback systems. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2007;23:733-738. (Pubitemid 350055696)