Quantitative angiographic methods for bifurcation lesions: A consensus statement from the European Bifurcation Group

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 258-266

  Lansky, Alexandra ^a   Tuinenburg, Joan ^b   Costa, Marco ^c   Maeng, Michael ^d   Koning, Gerhard ^b   Popma, Jeffrey ^e   Cristea, Ecatarina ^a   Gavit, Laurence ^f   Costa, Ricardo ^g   Rares, Andrei ^b   Van Es, Gerritt Ann ^h   Lefevre, Thierry ⁱ   Reiber, Hans ^b   Louvard, Yves ⁱ   Morice, Marie Claude ⁱ  

^a Department of Medicine   (United States)

^b Medis Medical Imaging Systems bv   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

^d AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^e BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f Jack H Skirball Center for Cardiovascular Research   (United States)

^g Dante Passaneze   (Brazil)

^h CARDIALYSIS   (Netherlands)

ⁱ INSTITUT HOSPITALIER JACQUES CARTIER   (France)

Author keywords

Diagnostic cardiac catheterization; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Quantitative coronary angiography

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BLOOD VESSEL BIFURCATION; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; BLOOD VESSEL OCCLUSION; BLOOD VESSEL PARAMETERS; CONGENITAL BLOOD VESSEL MALFORMATION; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LATE LUMEN LOSS; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; RESTENOSIS; STANDARD;

ALGORITHMS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY STENOSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOFTWARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 60649118167     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21814     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley M, et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty with four multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Circulation 1990;82:1193-1202.
2. Dzavik VKR, Ivanov J, Ing DJ, Bui S, Mackie K, Ramsamujh R, Barolet A, Schwartz L, Seidelin PH. Predictors of long-term outcome after crush stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions: Importance of the bifurcation angle. Am Heart J 2006;152:762-769.
3. Louvard Y, Lefèvre T, Morice MC. Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary disease. Heart 2004;90:713-722.
4. Reiber JH, van der Zwet PM, Koning G, et al. Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: Observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;28:187-198.
5. Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, et al.; Nordic PCI Study Group. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: The Nordic bifurcation study. Circulation 2006;114:1955-1961.
6. Goktekin OKS, Dimopoulos K, Barlis P, et al. A new quantitative analysis system for the evaluation of coronary bifurcation lesions: Comparison with current conventional methods. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69:172-180.
7. Kassab GS. Scaling laws of vascular trees: Of form and function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006;290:894-903.
8. Kamiya A, Takahashi T. Quantitative assessments of morphological and functional properties of biological trees based on their fractal nature. J Appl Physiol 2007;102:2315-2323.
9. Finet GGM, Perrenot B, Rioufol G, Motreff P, Gavit L, Prost R. Fractal geometry of arterial coronary bifurcations. A quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound analysis. Eurointervention (in press).
10. Koo BK, Kang HJ, Youn TJ, Chae IH, Choi DJ, Kim HS, Sohn DW, Oh BH, Lee MM, Park YB, Choi YS, Tahk SJ. Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:633-637.
11. Costa RA, Mintz GS, Carlier SG, Lansky AJ, Moussa I, Fujii K, Takebayashi H, Yasuda T, Costa JR, Tsuchiya Y, Jensen LO, Cristea E, Mehran R, Dangas GD, Iyer S, Collins M, Kreps EM, Colombo A, Stone GW, Leon MB, Moses JW. Bifurcation coronary lesions treated with the "crush" technique: An intravascular ultrasound analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:599-605.
12. Mauri LOE, Orav EJ, Kuntz RE. Late loss in lumen diameter and binary restenosis for drug-eluting stent comparison. Circulation 2005;111:3435-3442.
13. Pocock SJ, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Popma JJ, Fahy MP, Na Y, Dangas G, Moses JW, Pucelikova T, Kandzari DE, Ellis SG, Leon MB, Stone GW. Angiographic surrogate endpoints in drug-eluting stent trials: A systematic evaluation based on individual patient data from eleven randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Cardiol (in press).
14. Costa MA, Sabate M, Angiolillo DJ, et al. Relocation of minimal luminal diameter after bare metal and drug-eluting stent implantation: Incidence and impact on angiographic late loss. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69:181-188.
15. Reiber JHC, Tuinenburg JC, Koning G, Janssen JP, Lansky A, Goedhart B. Chapter 2.2: Quantitative coronary arteriography. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2008.
16. Ramcharitar S, Onuma Y, Aben J-P, et al. A novel dedicated qualitative coronary analysis methodology for bifurcation lesions. Eurointervention 2008;3:553-557.
17. Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M. [A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions]. Rev Esp Cardiol 2006;59:183.