Fusion of 3D QCA and IVUS/OCT

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 197-207

  Tu, Shengxian ^a,d   Holm, Niels R ^b   Koning, Gerhard ^a,d   Huang, Zheng ^c   Reiber, Johan H C ^a,d  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d Medis Medical Imaging Systems bv   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Intravascular ultrasound; Optical coherence tomography; Quantitative coronary angiography; Three dimensional reconstruction

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALGORITHM; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CHINA; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STENT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CHINA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 79960731765     PISSN: 15695794     EISSN: 15730743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9809-2     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, Kooijman CJ et al (1985) Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation 71:280-288 (Pubitemid 15157088)
2. Reiber JHC, Tuinenburg JC, Koning G et al (2009) Chapter 2.2: quantitative coronary arteriography. In: Oudkerk M, Reiser MF (eds) Coronary radiology, medical radiology, 2nd revised edn, Springer, Berlin, pp 41-65
3. Goktekin O, Kaplan S, Dimopoulos K et al (2007) A new quantitative analysis system for the evaluation of coronary bifurcation lesions: comparison with current conventional methods. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69:172-180 (Pubitemid 46214248)
4. Rittger H, Schertel B, Schmidt M et al (2009) Three-dimensional reconstruction allows accurate quantification and length measurements of coronary artery stenoses. EuroIntervention 5:127-132
5. Tu S, Huang Z, Koning G et al (2010) A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: in vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76:291-298
6. Bruining N, Tanimoto S, Otsuka M et al (2008) Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a bioabsorbable poly-L-lactid acid stent design in the acute phase: a comparison between 2 and 3D-QCA, QCU and QMSCT-CA. EuroIntervention 4:285-291
7. Schuurbiers JC, Lopez NG, Ligthart J et al (2009) In vivo validation of CAAS QCA-3D coronary reconstruction using fusion of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (ANGUS). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 73:620-626
8. Tu S, Koning G, Jukema W et al (2010) Assessment of obstruction length and optimal viewing angle from biplane X-ray angiograms. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26:5-17
9. Green NE, Chen SJ, Hansgen AR et al (2005) Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs computer-generated views. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 64:451-459 (Pubitemid 40463442)
10. Sadamatsu K, Sagara S, Yamawaki T et al (2009) Three-dimensional coronary imaging for the ostium of the left anterior descending artery. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:223-228
11. Gollapudi RR, Valencia R, Lee SS et al (2007) Utility of three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary angiography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69:479-482 (Pubitemid 46363846)
12. Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins CK et al (1987) Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 316:1371-1375 (Pubitemid 17079680)
13. Dumay ACM (1992) Image reconstruction from biplane angiographic projections. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology
14. Wahle A, Wellnhofer E, Mugaragu I et al (1995) Assessment of diffuse coronary artery disease by quantitative analysis of coronary morphology based upon 3-D reconstruction from biplane angiograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 14:230-241
15. Chen SJ, Carroll JD, Messenger JC (2002) Quantitative Analysis of Reconstructed 3-D Coronary Arterial Tree and Intracoronary Devices. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21:724-740 (Pubitemid 35250487)
16. Janssen JP, Koning G, De Koning PJH et al (2005) A new approach to contour detection in X-ray arteriograms: the wavecontour. Invest Radiol 40:514-520 (Pubitemid 41040688)
17. Reiber JHC, van der Zwet PM, Koning G et al (1993) Accuracy and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography: observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 28:187-198 (Pubitemid 23097000)
18. Slager CJ, Wentzel JJ, Schuurbiers JCH et al (2000) True 3-Dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries in patients by fusion of angiography and IVUS (ANGUS) and its quantitative validation. Circulation 102:511-516 (Pubitemid 30639968)
19. Wahle A, Lopez JJ, Olszewski ME et al (2006) Plaque development, vessel curvature, and wall shear stress in coronary arteries assessed by X-ray angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Med Image Anal 10:615-631 (Pubitemid 44161149)
20. Rotger D, Radeva P, Canero C et al (2001) Corresponding IVUS and angiogram image data. Proc Comput Cardiol 28:273-276 (Pubitemid 34167121)
21. Tu S, Koning G, Tuinenburg JC et al (2009) Coronary angiography enhancement for visualization. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:657-667
22. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ et al (2003) Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 349:1315-1323 (Pubitemid 37186209)
23. Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA et al (2004) A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 350:221-231 (Pubitemid 38067635)
24. Stone GW, Moses JW, Ellis SG et al (2007) Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med 356:998-1008 (Pubitemid 46376800)
25. Fujii K, Carlier SG, Mintz GS et al (2005) Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:995-998 (Pubitemid 40432428)
26. Costa MA, Angiolillo DJ, Tannenbaum M et al (2008) Impact of stent deployment procedural factors on long-term effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (final results of the multicenter prospective STLLR trial). Am J Cardiol 101:1704-1711
27. Brown BG, Bolson E, Frimer M et al (1977) Quantitative coronary angiography: estimation of dimensions, hemodynamic resistance, and atheroma mass of coronary artery lesions using arteriography in 256 nonoperated patients. Circulation 55:329-337 (Pubitemid 8031071)
28. Koning G, Hekking E, Kemppainen JS et al (2001) Suitability of the Cordis StabilizerTM marker guide wire for quantitative coronary angiography calibration: an in vitro and in vivo study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52:334-341 (Pubitemid 32184880)
29. Sawada T, Shite J, Negi N et al (2009) Factors that influence measurements and accurate evaluation of stent apposition by optical coherence tomography. Assessment using a phantom model. Circ J 73:1841-1847
30. Geselschap JH, Heilbron MJ, Hussain FM et al (1998) The effect of angulation on intravascular ultrasound imaging observed in vascular phantoms. J Endovasc Surg 5:126-133 (Pubitemid 28252717)
31. Bruining N, von Birgelen C, de Feyter PJ et al (1998) ECG-gated versus nongated three-dimensional intracoronary untrasound analysis: implications for volumetric measurements. Cathe Cardiovasc Diagn 43:254-260
32. Tanaka K, Carlier SG, Mintz GS et al (2007) The accuracy of length measurements using different intravascular ultrasound motorized transducer pullback systems. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 23:733-738 (Pubitemid 350055696)