Comparative analysis of surface wear from total hip prostheses tested on a mechanical simulator according to standards ISO 14242-1 and ISO 14242-3

Wear

Volumn 271, Issue 9-10, 2011, Pages 2340-2345

  Oliveira, A L L ^a   Lima, R G ^a   Cueva, E G ^b   Queiroz, R D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA   (Brazil)

^c the Public Worker State Hospital of São Paulo   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Hip joint; Human gait; Mechanical simulator; Wear test

Indexed keywords

ACETABULAR COMPONENTS; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; FEMORAL HEADS; HIP JOINTS; HUMAN GAIT; IN-VIVO; MECHANICAL SIMULATOR; MECHANICAL SIMULATORS; PROSTHETIC COMPONENTS; ROUGHNESS PARAMETERS; SURFACE WEAR; WEAR TEST;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; KINEMATICS; PROSTHETICS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SIMULATORS; STAINLESS STEEL; SURFACES; TESTING; ULTRAHIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENES;

HIP PROSTHESES;

EID: 79960684776     PISSN: 00431648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2011.01.062     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. J. Charnley, Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip: Theory and Practice, 1st ed., Berlin, 1979.
2. Reinisch G., Schoerg J., Leder E., Judmann K.P., Plitz W., Franek F. Differences of the mechanical setup of hip simulators and their consequences on the outcome of hip wear testing. J. ASTM Int. 2006, 3:1-15.
3. Ramamurti B.S., Estok D.M., Jasty M., Harris W.H. Analysis of the kinematics of different hip simulators used to study wear of candidate materials for the articulation of total hip arthroplasties. J. Orthop. Res. 1998, 16:365-369.
4. Dumbleton J.H., Miller D.A. A simulator for load bearing joints. Wear 1972, 165-174.
5. Saikko V., Calonius O. Slide track analysis of the relative motion between femoral head and acetabular cup in walking and in hip simulators. J. Biomech. 2002, 35:455-464.
6. Saikko V., Calonius O. An improved method of computing the wear factor for total hip prostheses involving the variation of relative motion and contact pressure with location on the bearing surface. J. Biomech. 2002, 36:1819-1827.
7. Goldsmith A.A.J., Dowson1 D. A multi-station hip joint simulator study of the performance of 22mm diameter zirconia-ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene total replacement hip joints. Inst. Mech. Eng. 1998, 213:199-205.
8. Kaddick C., Winmer M.A. Hip simulator wear testing according to the newly introduced standard ISO 14242. Inst. Mech. Eng. 2001, 215:422-429.
9. Ortega-Sáenz J.A., Rodríguez M.A.L.H., Unzueta A.P., Solis R.M. Development of a hip wear simulation rig including micro-separation. Wear 2007, 263:1527-1532.
10. Viceconti M., Cavallottit G., Andrisano A.O., Toni A. Discussion on the design of a hip joint simulator. Med. Eng. Phys. 1996, 18:234-240.
11. Affatato S., Spinelli M., Zavalloni M., Fabbro M., Viceconti M. Tribology and total hip joint replacement: current concepts in mechanical simulation. Med. Eng. Phys. 2008, 30:1305-1317.
12. Bragdon C.R., O'Connor D.O., Lowestein J.D., Jasty M., Syniuta W.D. The importance of multidirectional motion on the wear of polyethylene. Inst. Mech. Eng. 1996, 210:157-165.
13. ISO 14242-1:2002, Implants for surgery-wear of total hip-joint prostheses-part 1: loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines and corresponding environmental conditions for test, International Organization for Standardization, 2002.
14. ISO 14242-3:2009, Implants for surgery-wear of total hip joint prostheses-part 3: loading and displacement parameters for orbital bearing type wear testing machines and corresponding environmental conditions for test, International Organization for Standardization, 2009.
15. McKellop H., Clarke I. Evolution and evaluation of materials-screening machines and joint simulators in predicting in vivo wear phenomena. Funct. Behav. Orthop. Biomater. 1984, 2.
16. Essner A., Schmidig G., Wang A. The clinical relevance of hip joint simulator testing: in vitro and in vivo comparisons. Wear 2005, 259:882-886.
17. Calonius O., Saikko V. Force track analysis of contemporary hip simulators. J. Biomech. 2003, 36:1719-1726.
18. Calonius O., Saikko V. Analysis of relative motion between femoral head and acetabular cup and advances in computation of the wear factor for the prosthetic hip joint. Acta Polytechnica 2003, 43:43-54.
19. Saikko V. A three-axis hip joint simulator for wear and friction studies on total hip prostheses. Inst. Mech. Eng. 1996, 210:175-185.
20. Brown T.D., Bartel D.L. What design factors influence wear behaviour at the bearing surfaces in total joint replacements?. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 1996, 16:101-106.
21. Johnston R.C., Smidt G.L., Iowa I.C. Measurement of hip-joint motion during walking: evaluation an electrogoniometric method. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1969, 51:1083-1094.
22. Dowson D., Jobbins B. Design and development of a versatile hip joint simulator and a preliminary assessment of wear and creep in Charnley total replacement hip joints. Med. Eng. Phys. 1988, 3:111-118.
23. Paul J.P. Force actions transmitted by joints in the human body. Proc. R. Soc. London 1976, 192:163-172.
24. Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Heller M., Graichen F., Rohlmann A., Strauss J., Duda G.N. The importance of multidirectional motion on the wear of polyethylene. Inst. Mech. Eng. 2001, 34:859-871.
25. N.D.L. Burger, Failure analysis of ultra-height molecular weight polyethylene acetabular cups, PhD thesis, 2006.
26. Calonius O., Saikko V. Slide track analysis of eight contemporary hip simulator designs. J. Biomech. 2002, 35:1439-1450.
27. ISO 5832-1:2007, Implants for surgery-metallic materials-part 1: wrought stainless steel, International Organization for Standardization, 2007.
28. ASTM F138:2008, Standard specification for wrought 18 chromium-14 nickel-2.5 molybdenum stainless steel bar and wire for surgical implants, American Society for Testing and Materials, 2008.
29. ISO 5834-2:2006, Implants for surgery-ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene-part 2: moulded forms, International Organization for Standardization, 2006.
30. ASTM F648:2007, Standard specification for ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene powder and fabricated form for surgical implants, American Society for Testing and Materials, 2007.
31. Malvino A.P. Electronic instrumentation fundamentals 1967, p.465. McGraw-Hill, New York. 2nd ed.
32. Bowers B. The genesis of the Wheatstone bridge. Eng. Sci. Educ. J. 2001, 1:37-40.
33. ISO 11562:1996. Geometrical product specifications (GPS)-surface texture: profile method-metrological characteristics of phase correct filters. International Organization for Standardization, 1996.
34. Abbott E.J., Firestone F.A. Specifying surface quality: a method based on accurate measurement and comparison. Mech. Eng. 1933, 55:569-572.
35. ASME B46.1:2002, Surface texture, surface roughness, waviness and lay. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2002.
36. ISO 468:1982. Surface roughness-parameters, their values and general rules for specifying requirements. International Organization for Standardization, 1982.
37. ISO 4288:1996. Geometrical product specifications (GPS)-surface texture: profile method-rules and procedures for the assessment of surface texture. International Organization for Standardization, 1996.
38. ISO 7206-2:1999.Implants for surgery-partial and total hip joint prostheses-part 2: Articulating surfaces made of metallic, ceramic and plastics materials. International Organization for Standardization, 1999.
39. Hutchings I.C. Tribology: friction and wear of engineering materials 1999, Edward Arnold, London.
40. Wilches L.V., Uribe J.A., Toro A. Wear of materials used for artificial joints in total hip replacements. Wear 2008, 265:143-149.
41. Wang A., Sun D.C., Yau S.S., Edwards B., Sokol M., Essner A., Polineni V.K., Stark C., Dumbletonand J.H. Orientation softening in the deformation and wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Wear 1997, 203:230-241.