Interest in cavity shaving in breast conservative treatment does not depend on lumpectomy technique

Breast

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 358-364

  Feron, J G ^a   Nguyen, A ^a   Bezu C ^a   Antoine, M ^a   Darai, E ^a   Coutant, C ^a   Rouzier, R ^a   Uzan, S ^a  

^a HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast conservative surgery; Cavity shaving; Lumpectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CAVITY SHAVING; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARAMETERS OF MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT RESPONSE; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 79960580140     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: 15323080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Jacobson J.A., Danforth D.N., Cowan K.H., d'Angelo T., Steinberg S.M., Pierce L., et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995, 332:907-911.
2. Fisher B., Anderson S., Redmond C.K., Wolmark N., Wickerham D.L., Cronin W.M. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995, 333:1456-1461.
3. Veronesi U., Salvadori B., Luini A., Greco M., Saccozzi R., del Vecchio M., et al. Breast conservation is a safe method in patients with small cancer of the breast. Long-term results of three randomised trials on 1973 patients. Eur J Cancer 1995, 31A:1574-1579.
4. Silverstein M.J., Lagios M.D., Groshen S., Waisman J.R., Lewinsky B.S., Martino S., et al. The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med 1999, 340:1455-1461.
5. Gage I., Schnitt S.J., Nixon A.J., Silver B., Recht A., Troyan S.L., et al. Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Cancer 1996, 78:1921-1928.
6. Leong C., Boyages J., Jayasinghe U.W., Bilous M., Ung O., Chua B., et al. Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy for lymph node-negative breast carcinoma. Cancer 2004, 100:1823-1832.
7. Luu H.H., Otis C.N., Reed W.P., Garb J.L., Frank J.L. The unsatisfactory margin in breast cancer surgery. Am J Surg 1999, 178:362-366.
8. Cao D., Lin C., Woo S.H., Vang R., Tsangaris T.N., Argani P. Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions. Am J Surg Pathol 2005, 29:1625-1632.
9. Barthelmes L., Al Awa A., Crawford D.J. Effect of cavity margin shavings to ensure completeness of excision on local recurrence rates following breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003, 29:644-648.
10. Tengher-Barna I., Hequet D., Reboul-Marty J., Frassati-Biaggi A., Seince N., Rodrigues-Faure A., et al. Prevalence and predictive factors for the detection of carcinoma in cavity margin performed at the time of breast lumpectomy. Mod Pathol 2008.
11. Coutant C., Olivier C., Lambaudie E., Fondrinier E., Marchal F., Guillemin F., et al. Comparison of models to predict nonsentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 2009.
12. van Dongen J.A., Bartelink H., Fentiman I.S., Lerut T., Mignolet F., Olthuis G., et al. Factors influencing local relapse and survival and results of salvage treatment after breast-conserving therapy in operable breast cancer: EORTC trial 10801, breast conservation compared with mastectomy in TNM stage I and II breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 1992, 28A:801-805.
13. Veronesi U., Cascinelli N., Mariani L., Greco M., Saccozzi R., Luini A., et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002, 347:1227-1232.
14. Jacobson A.F., Asad J., Boolbol S.K., Osborne M.P., Boachie-Adjei K., Feldman S.M. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?. Am J Surg 2008, 196:556-558.
15. Besana-Ciani I., Greenall M.J. The importance of margins status after breast conservative surgery and radiotherapy in node positive patients: a follow-up of 10-15 years. Int Semin Surg Oncol 2008, 5:13.
16. Lovrics P.J., Cornacchi S.D., Farrokhyar F., Garnett A., Chen V., Franic S., et al. The relationship between surgical factors and margin status after breast-conservation surgery for early stage breast cancer. Am J Surg 2008.
17. Huston T.L., Pigalarga R., Osborne M.P., Tousimis E. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg 2006, 192:509-512.
18. Haga S., Makita M., Shimizu T., Watanabe O., Imamura H., Kajiwara T., et al. Histopathological study of local residual carcinoma after simulated lumpectomy. Surg Today 1995, 25:329-333.
19. Wazer D.E., Schmidt-Ullrich R.K., Schmid C.H., Ruthazer R., Kramer B., Safaii H., et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997, 38:291-299.
20. Beck N.E., Bradburn M.J., Vincenti A.C., Rainsbury R.M. Detection of residual disease following breast-conserving surgery. Br J Surg 1998, 85:1273-1276.
21. Taghian A., Mohiuddin M., Jagsi R., Goldberg S., Ceilley E., Powell S. Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: results of a survey. Ann Surg 2005, 241:629-639.
22. Keskek M., Kothari M., Ardehali B., Betambeau N., Nasiri N., Gui G.P. Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004, 30:1058-1064.
23. Singletary S.E. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 2002, 184:383-393.
24. Freedman G., Fowble B., Hanlon A., Nicolaou N., Fein D., Hoffman J., et al. Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999, 44:1005-1015.
25. Neuschatz A.C., DiPetrillo T., Steinhoff M., Safaii H., Yunes M., Landa M., et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 2002, 94:1917-1924.
26. Sauter E.R., Hoffman J.P., Ottery F.D., Kowalyshyn M.J., Litwin S., Eisenberg B.L. Is frozen section analysis of reexcision lumpectomy margins worthwhile? Margin analysis in breast reexcisions. Cancer 1994, 73:2607-2612.
27. Papa M.Z., Zippel D., Koller M., Klein E., Chetrit A., Ari G.B. Positive margins of breast biopsy: is reexcision always necessary?. J Surg Oncol 1999, 70:167-171.
28. Hewes J.C., Imkampe A., Haji A., Bates T. Importance of routine cavity sampling in breast conservation surgery. Br J Surg 2009, 96:47-53.
29. Cochrane R.A., Valasiadou P., Wilson A.R., Al-Ghazal S.K., Macmillan R.D. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg 2003, 90(12):1505-1509.