Evaluating the effective shear modulus of the cytoplasm in cultured myoblasts subjected to compression using an inverse finite element method

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 4, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1559-1566

  Slomka, Noa ^a   Oomens, Cees W J ^b   Gefen, Amit ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

C2C12 skeletal muscle cells; Cellular mechanics; Confocal microscopy; Mechanical properties; Reverse engineering

Indexed keywords

CELL LOADING; CELL STRESS; CELL TYPES; CELLULAR MECHANICS; EFFECTIVE SHEAR MODULUS; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FE ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT MODELING; FORCE-DEFORMATION BEHAVIOR; FORCE-DEFORMATION CURVES; INVERSE FINITE ELEMENT METHODS; LARGE DEFORMATION ANALYSIS; MEDIAN VALUE; MYOBLASTS; PEARSON CORRELATION; SKELETAL MUSCLE CELLS; SKELETAL MYOBLASTS; STANDARD DEVIATION; SUM OF SQUARED ERRORS;

BIOMECHANICS; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CURVE FITTING; CYTOLOGY; DEFORMATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); ELASTIC MODULI; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; REVERSE ENGINEERING; STRESSES;

CELLS;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CELL CULTURE; CELL STRESS; COMPRESSION; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CYTOPLASM; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MYOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; CALIBRATION; CELL LINE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CYTOPLASM; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MICE; MYOBLASTS, SKELETAL; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 79960560340     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baaijens F.P., Trickey W.R., Laursen T.A., Guilak F. Large deformation finite element analysis of micropipette aspiration to determine the mechanical properties of the chondrocyte. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 33:494-501.
2. Bader D.L., Ohashi T., Knight M.M., Lee D.A., Sato M. Deformation properties of articular chondrocytes: a critique of three separate techniques. Biorheology 2002, 39:69-78.
3. Bausch A.R., Ziemann F., Boulbitch A.A., Jacobson K., Sackmann E. Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry. Biophys. J. 1998, 75:2038-2049.
4. Becker W.M., Kleinsmith L.J., Hardin J., Becker W.M. The World of the Cell 2003, Benjamin, Cummings Pub. Co., San Francisco. fourth ed.
5. Breuls R.G., Sengers B.G., Oomens C.W., Bouten C.V., Baaijens F.P. Predicting local cell deformations in engineered tissue constructs: a multilevel finite element approach. J. Biomech. Eng. 2002, 124:198-207.
6. Caille N., Thoumine O., Tardy Y., Meister J.J. Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. J. Biomech. 2002, 35:177-178.
7. Chen A., Moy V.T. Cross-linking of cell surface receptors enhances cooperativity of molecular adhesion. Biophys. J. 2000, 78:2814-2820.
8. Collinsworth A.M., Zhang S., Kraus W.E., Truskey G.A. Apparent elastic modulus and hysteresis of skeletal muscle cells throughout differentiation. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2002, 283:1219-1227.
9. Darling E.M., Topel M., Zauscher S., Vail T.P., Guilak F. Viscoelastic properties of human mesenchymally-derived stem cells and primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. J. Biomech. 2008, 41:454-464.
10. Gefen A., Cornelissen L.H., Gawlitta D., Bader D.L., Oomens C.W. The free diffusion of macromolecules in tissue-engineered skeletal muscle subjected to large compression strains. J. Biomech. 2008, 41:845-853.
11. Gefen A., Haberman E. Viscoelastic properties of ovine adipose tissue covering the gluteus muscles. J. Biomech. Eng. 2007, 129:924-930.
12. Gefen A., van Nierop B., Bader D.L., Oomens C.W. Strain-time cell-death threshold for skeletal muscle in a tissue-engineered model system for deep tissue injury. J. Biomech. 2008, 41:2003-2012.
13. Gladilin E., Eils R. Determination of constitutive properties of single cells and intracellular structures using image- and model-based framework. 6th World Congress of Biomechanics 2010, vol. 31:1121-1124. IFMBE Proceedings, Singapore.
14. Gladilin E., Micoulet A., Hosseini B., Rohr K., Spatz J., Eils R. 3D finite element analysis of uniaxial cell stretching: from image to insight. Phys. Biol. 2007, 4:104-113.
15. Guilak F., Tedrow J.R., Burgkart R. Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 269:781-786.
16. Hochmuth R.M., Mohandas N., Blackshear P.L. Measurement of the elastic modulus for red cell membrane using a fluid mechanical technique. Biophys. J. 1973, 13:747-762.
17. Hochmuth R.M. Micropipette aspiration of living cells. J. Biomech. 2000, 33:15-22.
18. Jones W.R., Ting-Beall H.P., Lee C.M., Kelley S.S., Hochmuth R.M., Guilak F. Alterations in the Young's modulus and volumetric properties of chondrocytes isolated from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage. J. Biomech. 1999, 32:119-127.
19. Kamgoué A., Ohayon J., Tracqui P. Estimation of cell Young's modulus of adherent cells probed by optical and magnetic tweezers: influence of cell thickness and bead immersion. J. Biomech. Eng. 2007, 129:523-530.
20. Kim Y., Kim M., Shin J.H., Kim J. Characterization of cellular elastic modulus using structure based double layer model. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2011, 49:453-462.
21. Knight M.M., Toyoda T., Lee D.A., Bader D.L. Mechanical compression and hydrostatic pressure induce reversible changes in actin cytoskeletal organisation in chondrocytes in agarose. J. Biomech. 2006, 39:1547-1551.
22. Koay E.J., Shieh A.C., Athanasiou K.A. Creep indentation of single cells. J. Biomech. Eng. 2003, 125:334-341.
23. Laurent V.M., Hénon S., Planus E., Fodil R., Balland M., Isabey D., Gallet F. Assessment of mechanical properties of adherent living cells by bead micromanipulation: comparison of magnetic twisting cytometry vs optical tweezers. J. Biomech. Eng. 2002, 124:408-421.
24. Mathur A.B., Collinsworth A.M., Reichert W.M., Kraus W.E., Truskey G.A. Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy. J. Biomech. 2001, 34:1545-1553.
25. McGarry J.P. Characterization of cell mechanical properties by computational modeling of parallel plate compression. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 37:2317-2325.
26. Ofek G., Natoli R.M., Athanasiou K.A. In situ mechanical properties of the chondrocyte cytoplasm and nucleus. J. Biomech. 2009, 42:873-877.
27. Or-Tzadikario S., Gefen A. Confocal-based cell-specific finite element modeling extended to study variable cell shapes and intracellular structures: the example of the adipocyte. J. Biomech. 2011, 44:567-573.
28. Palevski A., Glaich I., Portnoy S., Linder-Ganz E., Gefen A. Stress relaxation of porcine gluteus muscle subjected to sudden transverse deformation as related to pressure sore modeling. J. Biomech. Eng. 2006, 128:782-787.
29. Peeters E.A., Oomens C.W., Bouten C.V., Bader D.L., Baaijens F.P. Viscoelastic properties of single attached cells under compression. J. Biomech. Eng. 2005, 127:237-243.
30. Peeters E.A., Oomens C.W., Bouten C.V., Bader D.L., Baaijens F.P. Mechanical and failure properties of single attached cells under compression. J. Biomech. 2005, 38:1685-1693.
31. Slomka N., Gefen A. Confocal microscopy-based three-dimensional cell-specific modeling for large deformation analyses in cellular mechanics. J. Biomech. 2010, 43:1806-1816.
32. Slomka N., Or-Tzadikario S., Sassun D., Gefen A. Membrane-stretch-induced cell death in deep tissue injury: computer model studies. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 2009, 2:118-132.
33. Zhao R., Wyss K., Simmons C.A. Comparison of analytical and inverse finite element approaches to estimate cell viscoelastic properties by micropipette aspiration. J. Biomech. 2009, 42:2768-2773.