3D finite element analysis of uniaxial cell stretching: From image to insight

Physical Biology

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 104-113

  Gladilin, E ^a   Micoulet, A ^b   Hosseini, B ^b   Rohr, K ^a,b   Spatz, J ^b,c   Eils, R ^a,b  

^a GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL SHAPE; CELL STRESS; CELL STRUCTURE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPLASM; ELASTICITY; EMBRYO; EUKARYOTIC CELL; FIBROBLAST; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; INTRACELLULAR SPACE; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EUKARYOTA; RATTUS;

EID: 34447281803     PISSN: 14783967     EISSN: 14783975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/4/2/004     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Amira version 3.1 (Berlin: Indeed-Visual Concepts) http://www.amiravis. com
2. Ciarlet P G 1988 Mathematical Elasticity: Vol I. Three-Dimensional Elasticity (Studies in Mathematics and its Applications vol 20) (Amsterdam: North-Holland)
3. Dao M, Lim C T and Suresh S 2003 Mechanics of the human red blood cell deformed by optical tweezers J. Mech. Phys. Solids 51 2259-80
4. Evans E A 1973 New membrane concept applied to the analysis of fluid shear- and micropipette-deformed red blood cells Biophys. J. 13 941-54
5. Fernandez P, Pullarkat P A and Ott A 2006 A master relation defines the nonlinear viscoelasticity of single fibroblasts Biophys. J. 90 3796-805
6. Fung Y C 1993 Biomechanics-Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues (Berlin: Springer)
7. Gladilin E, Rohr K and Eils R 2005 A two component FE-model of uniaxial cell stretching Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on BioMedical Engineering (ICBME 2005) (Singapore)
8. Guck J, Ananthakrishnan R, Mahmood H, Moon T J, Cunningham C C and Käs J 2001 The optical stretcher: a novel laser tool to micromanipulate cells Biophys. J. 81 767-84
9. Guilak F, Tedrow J R and Burgkart R 2000 Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 269 781-6
10. Ingber D E 2003 Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction Ann. Med. 35 564-77
11. Kamm R D, McVittie A K and Bathe M 2000 On the role of continuum models in mechanobiology Proc. ASME Int. Congress-Mechanics in Biology vol 242 pp 1-9
12. Karcher H, Lammerding J, Huang H, Lee R T, Kamm R D and Kaazempur-Mofrad M R 2003 A three-dimensional viscoelastic model for cell deformation with experimental verification Biophys. J. 85 3336-49
13. McGarry J G and Prendergast P J 2004 A three-dimensional finite element model of an adherent eukaryotic cell Eur. Cells Mater. 7 27-34
14. Micoulet A, Spatz J P and Ott A 2005 Mechanical response analysis and power generation by single-cell stretching Chem. Phys. Chem. 6 663-70
15. Mijailovich S M, Kojic M, Zivkovic M, Fabry B and Fredberg J 2002 A finite element model of cell deformation during magnetic bead twisting J. Appl. Physiol. 93 1429-36
16. Mohrdieck C and Arzt E 2005 A model for the increased elastic compliance in human cancer cells Proc. MRS Symposium pp 249-54
17. Ruoslahti E 1996 Common principles in cell adhesion Exp. Cell Res. 227 1-11
18. Schwarz U S and Safran S A 2002 Elastic interactions of cells Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 1-4
19. Shin D and Athanasiou K 1999 Cytoindentation for obtaining cell biomechanical properties J. Orthop. Res. 17 880-90
20. Suresh S, Spatz J P, Mills J, Dao M, Lim C T, Beil M and Seufferlein T 2005 Connections between disease states and single-cell mechanical response: human pancreatic cancer and malaria Acta Biomaterialia 1 15-30
21. Svoboda K and Block S M 1994 Biological applications of optical forces Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 23 247-85
22. Thoumine O and Ott A 1997 Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation J. Cell Sci. 110 2109-16