Comparison of analytical and inverse finite element approaches to estimate cell viscoelastic properties by micropipette aspiration

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 42, Issue 16, 2009, Pages 2768-2773

  Zhao, Ruogang ^a   Wyss, Kristine ^a,b   Simmons, Craig A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cell mechanics; Finite element analysis; Micropipette aspiration; Viscoelasticity

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE CELLS; ANALYTICAL MODEL; AORTIC VALVES; BIOLOGICAL VARIABILITY; CELL DEFORMATION; CELL MATERIALS; CELL MECHANICS; CELL PHENOTYPE; CELL RADIUS; CELL-SIZE; CELL-TO-CELL VARIABILITY; ESTIMATION METHODS; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FE METHOD; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENTS; HALF-SPACE; INDIVIDUAL CELLS; INVERSE FINITE ELEMENT APPROACHES; LOADING RATE; MECHANICAL LOADING; MICROPIPETTE ASPIRATION; PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS; PRACTICAL GUIDELINES; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; VISCO-ELASTIC PARAMETERS; VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES;

CELLS; CYTOLOGY; ELASTICITY; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; VISCOELASTICITY; VISCOSITY;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

ANIMAL CELL; AORTA VALVE; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION; CELL SIZE; CELL STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANICS; MICROPIPETTE; NONHUMAN; PARAMETRIC TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE; VISCOELASTICITY;

ANIMALS; CELLS, CULTURED; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MICROMANIPULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SUCTION; SWINE; VISCOSITY;

EID: 71549154697     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.07.035     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ABAQUS, 2006. ABAQUS Analysis User's Manual (version 6.6). ABAQUS, Inc., Providence, RI, USA.
2. Alexopoulos L.G., Haider M.A., Vail T.P., and Guilak F. Alterations in the mechanical properties of the human chondrocyte pericellular matrix with osteoarthritis. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 125 3 (2003) 323-333
3. Aoki T., Ohashi T., Matsumoto T., and Sato M. The pipette aspiration applied to the local stiffness measurement of soft tissues. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 25 3 (1997) 581-587
4. Baaijens F.P.T., Trickey W.R., Laursen T.A., and Guilak F. Large deformation finite element analysis of micropipette aspiration to determine the mechanical properties of the chondrocyte. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 33 4 (2005) 494-501
5. Boudou T., Ohayon J., Arntz Y., Finet G., Picart C., and Tracqui P. An extended modeling of the micropipette aspiration experiment for the characterization of the Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of adherent thin biological samples: numerical and experimental studies. Journal of Biomechanics 39 9 (2006) 1677-1685
6. Darling E.M., Topel M., Zauscher S., Vail T.P., and Guilak F. Viscoelastic properties of human mesenchymally-derived stem cells and primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. Journal of Biomechanics 41 (2008) 454-464
7. Draper N.R., and Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis. second ed (1981), John Wiley and Sons, New York
8. Guilak F., Tedrow J.R., and Burgkart R. Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 269 3 (2000) 781-786
9. Guilak F., Ting-Beall H.P., Baer A.E., Trickey W.R., Erickson G.R., and Setton L.A. Viscoelastic properties of intervertebral disc cells-identification of two biomechanically distinct cell populations. Spine 24 23 (1999) 2475-2483
10. Haider M.A., and Guilak F. An axisymmetric boundary integral model for assessing elastic cell properties in the micropipette aspiration contact problem. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 124 (2002) 584-595
11. Hochmuth R.M. Micropipette aspiration of living cells. Journal of Biomechanics 33 1 (2000) 15-22
12. Kyriacou S.K., Shah A.D., and Humphery J.D. Inverse finite element characterization of nonlinear hyperelastic membranes. Journal of Applied Mechanics 64 (1997) 257-262
13. Lei F., and Szeri A.Z. Inverse analysis of constitutive models: biological soft tissues. Journal of Biomechanics 40 (2007) 936-940
14. Merryman W.D., Bieniek P.D., Guilak F., and Sacks M.S. Viscoelastic properties of the aortic valve interstitial cell. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 131 4 (2009) 041005
15. Pho M., Lee W., Watt D.R., Laschinger C., Simmons C.A., and McCulloch C.A. Cofilin is a marker of myofibroblast differentiation in cells from porcine aortic cardiac valves. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiolology 294 4 (2008) H1767-H1778
16. Rowat A.C., Lammerding J., and Ipsen J.H. Mechanical properties of the cell nucleus and the effect of emerin deficiency. Biophysical Journal 91 (2006) 4649-4664
17. Sato M., Theret D.P., Wheeler L.T., Ohshima N., and Nerem R.M. Application of the micropipette technique to the measurement of cultured porcine aortic endothelial cell viscoelastic properties. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 112 3 (1990) 268
18. Theret D.P., Levesque M.J., Sato M., Nerem R.M., and Wheeler L.T. The application of a homogeneous half-space model in the analysis of endothelial cell micropipette measurements. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 110 3 (1988) 190-199
19. Trickey W.R., Lee G.M., and Guilak F. Viscoelastic properties of chondrocytes from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 18 6 (2000) 891-898
20. Vaziri A., and Mofrad M.R.K. Mechanics and deformation of the nucleus in micropipette aspiration experiment. Journal of Biomechanics 40 (2007) 2053-2062
21. Ward K.A., Li W.-I., Zimmer S., and Davis T. Viscoelastic properties of transformed cells: role of tumor cell progression and metastasis formation. Biorheology 28 (1991) 301-313
22. Yip C.Y.Y., Chen J.-H., Zhao R., and Simmons C.A. Calcification by valve interstitial cells is regulated by the stiffness of the extracellular matrix. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 29 (2009) 936-942
23. Zhou E.H., Lim C.T., and Quek S.T. Finite element simulation of the micropipette aspiration of a living cell undergoing large viscoelastic deformation. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures 12 6 (2005) 501-512