Confocal microscopy-based three-dimensional cell-specific modeling for large deformation analyses in cellular mechanics

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 43, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1806-1816

  Slomka, Noa ^a   Gefen, Amit ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Cell compression; Cell stretching; Deep tissue injury; Finite element model; Pressure ulcer

Indexed keywords

CELL STRETCHING; DEEP TISSUE INJURY; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; PRESSURE ULCER; PRESSURE ULCERS;

CELL MEMBRANES; COMPRESSION TESTING; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DEFORMATION; ELASTICITY; EXPERIMENTS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; STRAIN; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TISSUE;

CYTOLOGY;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL DEFORMATION; CELL ELONGATION; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL TRANSFORMATION; CELL TYPE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; CYTOSOL; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; MOUSE; MUSCLE CELL; MYOBLAST; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR FLOW; SIMULATION; SKELETAL MUSCLE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL LINE; CELL SIZE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOLOGY; HARDNESS; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TENSILE STRENGTH; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CELL SIZE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; HARDNESS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MICE; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MYOBLASTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 77953543252     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Agam L., Gefen A. Pressure ulcers and deep tissue injury: a bioengineering perspective. J. Wound Care 2007, 16:336-342.
2. Baaijens F.P., Trickey W.R., Laursen T.A., Guilak F. Large deformation finite element analysis of micropipette aspiration to determine the mechanical properties of the chondrocyte. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 33:494-501.
3. Becker W.M., Kleinsmith L.J., Hardin J., Becker W.M. The World of the Cell 2003, Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co., San Francisco, p. 25.
4. Bernal R., Tassius C., Melo F., Geminard J.C. Mechanical characterization of elastic membranes: cell mechanics applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90:063903-1-063903-3.
5. Black J. Deep tissue injury: an evolving science. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009, 55:4.
6. Booser E.R. Handbook of Lubrication, Theory and Practice of Tribology, Volume II, Theory & Design 1983, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, U.S.A, pp. 46-47.
7. Breuls R.G., Sengers B.G., Oomens C.W., Bouten C.V., Baaijens F.P. Predicting local cell deformations in engineered tissue constructs: a multilevel finite element approach. J. Biomech. Eng. 2002, 124:198-207.
8. Carl P., Schillers H. Elasticity measurement of living cells with an atomic force microscope: data acquisition and processing. Eur. J. .Physiol. 2008, 457:551-559.
9. Chen A., Moy V.T. Cross-linking of cell surface receptors enhances cooperativity of molecular adhesion. Biophys. J. 2000, 78:2814-2820.
10. Dailey H.L., Ricles L.M., Yalcin H.C., Ghadiali S.N. Image-based finite element modeling of alveolar epithelial cell injury during airway reopening. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 106:221-232.
11. De Santis, G., Boschetti, F., Lennon, A.B., Prendergast, P.J., Verdonck, P., Verhegghe, B., 2009. How an eukaryotic cell senses the substrate stiffness? An extrapolation using a finite element model with cytoskeleton modelled as tensegrity structure. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2009 Summer Bioengineering Conference, June 17-21, Resort at Squaw Creek, Lake Tahoe, CA, USA.
12. Ferko M.C., Bhatnagar A., Garcia M.B., Butler P.J. Finite-element stress analysis of a multicomponent model of sheared and focally-adhered endothelial cells. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 35:208-223.
13. Freitas R.A. Nanomedicine, Volume I: Basic Capabilities 1999, Landes Bioscience, Austin, TX, USA.
14. Gawlitta D., Li W., Oomens C.W., Baaijens F.P., Bader D.L., Bouten C.V. The relative contributions of compression and hypoxia to development of muscle tissue damage: An in vitro study. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 35:273-284.
15. Gladilin E., Goetze S., Mateos-Langerak J., R V.A.N.D., Eils R., Rohr K. Shape normalization of 3d cell nuclei using elastic spherical mapping. J. Microsc. 2008, 231:105-114.
16. Gefen A., van Nierop B., Bader D.L., Oomens C.W. Strain-time cell-death threshold for skeletal muscle in a tissue-engineered model system for deep tissue injury. J. Biomech. 2008, 41:2003-2012.
17. Guilak F., Mow V.C. The mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite element model of cell-matrix interactions in articular cartilage. J. Biomech. 2000, 33:1663-1673.
18. Hawkins, T., Mirigian, M., Selcuk Yasar, M., Ross, J.L., 2009. Mechanics of microtubules. J. Biomech doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.005.
19. Hine R. The Facts on File Dictionary of Biology 1999, Checkmark Books, New York, p. 198. 3rd edition.
20. Hochmuth R.M., Mohandas N., Blackshear P.L. Measurement of the elastic modulus for red cell membrane using a fluid mechanical technique. Biophys. J. 1973, 13:747-762.
21. Ishiko A., Shimizu H., Kikuchi A., Ebihara T., Hashimoto T., Nishikawa T. Human autoantibodies against the 230-kD bullous pemphigoid antigen (BPAG1) bind only to the intracellular domain of the hemidesmosome, whereas those against the 180-kD bullous pemphigoid antigen (BPAG2) bind along the plasma membrane of the hemidesmosome in normal human and swine skin. J. Clin. Invest. 1993, 91:1608-1615.
22. Jean R.P., Chen C.S., Spector A.A. Finite-element analysis of the adhesion-cytoskeleton-nucleus mechanotransduction pathway during endothelial cell rounding: axisymmetric model. J. Biomech. Eng. 2005, 127:594-600.
23. Kamgoué A., Ohayon J., Tracqui P. Estimation of cell Young's modulus of adherent cells probed by optical and magnetic tweezers: influence of cell thickness and bead immersion. J. Biomech. Eng. 2007, 129:523-530.
24. Kis A., Kasas S., Babić B., Kulik A.J., Benoît W., Briggs G.A., Schönenberger C., Catsicas S., Forró L. Nanomechanics of microtubules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89:248101-1-248101-4.
25. Lenaerts L., van Lenthe G.H. Multi-level patient-specific modelling of the proximal femur. A promising tool to quantify the effect of osteoporosis treatment. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2009, 367:2079-2093.
26. Linder-Ganz E., Shabshin N., Itzchak Y., Gefen A. Assessment of mechanical conditions in sub-dermal tissues during sitting: a combined experimental-MRI and finite element approach. J. Biomech. 2007, 40:1443-1454.
27. McGarry, J.G., Prendergast, P.J., 2004. A three-dimensional finite element model of an adherent eukaryotic cell. Eur. Cell Mater.7, 27-33; discussion 33-24.
28. Ofek G., Natoli R.M., Athanasiou K.A. In situ mechanical properties of the chondrocyte cytoplasm and nucleus. J. Biomech. 2009, 42:873-877.
29. Peeters E.A., Oomens C.W., Bouten C.V., Bader D.L., Baaijens F.P. Mechanical and failure properties of single attached cells under compression. J. Biomech. 2005, 38:1685-1693.
30. Peeters E.A.G., Oomens C.W.J., Bouten C.V.C., Bader D.L., Baaijens F.P.T. Viscoelastic properties of single attached cells under compression. J. Biomech. Eng. 2005, 127:237-243.
31. Pistoia W., van Rietbergen B., Lochmuller E.M., Lill C.A., Eckstein F., Ruegsegger P. Image-based micro-finite-element modeling for improved distal radius strength diagnosis: moving from bench to bedside. J. Clin. Densitom. 2004, 7:153-160.
32. Portnoy S., Yizhar Z., Shabshin N., Itzchak Y., Kristal A., Dotan-Marom Y., Siev-Ner I., Gefen A. Internal mechanical conditions in the soft tissues of a residual limb of a trans-tibial amputee. J. Biomech. 2008, 41:1897-1909.
33. Slomka N., Or-Tzadikario S., Sassun D., Gefen A. Membrane-stretch-induced cell death in deep tissue injury: computer model studies. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 2009, 2:118-132.
34. Stroetz R.W., Vlahakis N.E., Walters B.J., Schroeder M.A., Hubmayr R.D. Validation of a new live cell strain system: characterization of plasma membrane stress failure. J. Appl. Physiol. 2001, 90:2361-2370.
35. Yun K., Wold B. Skeletal muscle determination and differentiation: story of a core regulatory network and its context. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1996, 8:877-889.