Chapter 13 Bilateral frontal leucotomy does not alter perceptual alternation during binocular rivalry

Progress in Brain Research

Volumn 155 B, Issue , 2006, Pages 235-239

  Valle Inclán, Fernando ^a   Gallego, Emma ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

Author keywords

binocular rivalry; consciousness; leucotomy; perceptual alternation; prefrontal cortex

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; BRAIN SURGERY; CASE REPORT; FRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; LOBOTOMY; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RIGHT HEMISPHERE;

AGED; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOSURGERY; SCHIZOPHRENIA; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33749240732     PISSN: 00796123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)55013-7     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Beck D.M., Rees G., Frith C.D., and Lavie N. Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nat. Neurosci. 4 (2001) 645-650
2. Blake R., Sobel K.V., and Gilroy L. Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations. Neuron 39 (2003) 869-878
3. Bonneh Y.S., Pavlovskaya M., Ring H., and Soroker N. Abnormal binocular rivalry in unilateral neglect: evidence for a non-spatial mechanism of extinction. Neuroreport 15 (2004) 473-477
4. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vis. 10 (1997) 433-436
5. Carlson T.A., and He S. Competing global representations fail to initiate binocular rivalry. Neuron 43 (2004) 907-914
6. Chen X., and He S. Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) 1013-1017
7. Fellows L.K., and Farah M.J. Is anterior cingulate cortex necessary for cognitive control?. Brain 128 (2005) 788-796
8. Gail A., Brinksmeyer H.J., and Eckhorn R. Perception-related modulations of local field potential power and coherence in primary visual cortex of awake monkey during binocular rivalry. Cereb. Cortex 14 (2004) 300-313
9. Giesbrecht B., Woldorff M.G., Song A.W., and Mangun G.R. Neural mechanism of top-down control during spatial and feature attention. NeuroImage 19 (2003) 496-512
10. Haynes J.D., Deichman R., and Rees G. Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature 438 (2005) 496-499
11. Kelly, A.M. and Garavan, H. (2005) Human functional neuroimaging of brain changes associated with practice. Cereb. Cortex, doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi005.
12. Kleinschmidt A., Büchel C., Zeki S., and Frackowiak R.S.J. Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 265 (1998) 2427-2433
13. Logothetis N.K. Single units and conscious vision. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 353 (1998) 1801-1818
14. Logothetis N.K., Pauls J., Augath M., Trinath T., and Oeltermann A. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of fMRI signal. Nature 412 (2001) 150-157
15. Logothetis N.K., and Wandell B.A. Interpreting the BOLD signal. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 66 (2004) 735-769
16. Lumer E.D., Friston K.J., and Rees G. Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 280 (1998) 1930-1934
17. Lumer E.D., and Rees G. Covariation of activity in visual and prefrontal cortex associated with subjective visual perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 1669-1673
18. Maccotta L., and Buckner R.L. Evidence for neural effects of repetition that directly correlate with behavioral priming. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16 (2004) 1625-1632
19. Meenan J.P., and Miller L.A. Perceptual flexibility after frontal or temporal lobectomy. Neuropsychologia 32 (1994) 1145-1149
20. Meng M., and Tong F. Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. J. Vis. 4 (2004) 539-551
21. O'Shea R.P., and Corballis P.M. Binocular rivalry in split brain observers. J. Vis. 3 (2003) 610-615
22. O'Shea R.P., and Corballis P.M. Visual grouping on binocular rivalry in a split-brain observer. Vision Res. 45 (2005) 247-261
23. O'Shea R.P., and Corballis P.M. In: Alais D., and Blake R. (Eds). Binocular rivalry in the divided brain (2005), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 301-316
24. Pelli D.G. The video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vis. 10 (1997) 437-442
25. Petersen S.E., Fox P.T., Posner M.I., Mintun M., and Raichle M.E. Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single word processing. Nature 331 (1988) 585-589
26. Polonsky A., Blake R., Braun J., and Heeger D.J. Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nat. Neurosci. 3 (2000) 1153-1159
27. Ricci C., and Blundo C. Perception of ambiguous figures after focal brain lesions. Neuropsychologia 28 (1990) 1163-1173
28. Rorden C., and Karnath H.-O. Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5 (2004) 813-819
29. Tomasi D., Ernst T., Caparelli E.C., and Chang L. Practice-induced changes of brain function during visual attention: a parametric fMRI study at 4 Tesla. Neuroimage 23 (2004) 1414-1421
30. Tong F., and Engel S.A. Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 411 (2001) 195-199
31. Tong F., Nakayama K., Vaughan J.T., and Kanwisher N. Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron 21 (1998) 753-759
32. Wunderlich K., Schneider K.A., and Kastner S. Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 1595-1602