Influence of gender and age on the attitudes of children towards humanoid robots

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6764 LNCS, Issue PART 4, 2011, Pages 637-646

  Tung, Fang Wu ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

child; Human Robot interaction; humanoid robot; interaction design

Indexed keywords

CHILD; HUMANOID ROBOT; INTERACTION DESIGN; ROBOTICS RESEARCH; HUMAN LIKE; HUMAN LIKE ROBOTS; ROBOTS FOR CHILDREN;

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MACHINE DESIGN; ROBOTS;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 79960295688     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21619-0_76     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Bartneck, C., Forlizzi, J.: A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 591-594. IEEE Press, Kurashiki (2004)
2. Kiesler, S., Hinds, P.: Introduction to This Special Issue on Human-Robot Interaction. In: Human- Computer Interaction, vol. 19, pp. 1-8 (2004)
3. Young, J., Sung, J., Voida, A., Sharlin, E., Igarashi, T., Christensen, H.I., Grinter, R.E.: Evaluating Human-Robot Interaction: Focusing on the Holistic Interaction Experience. International Journal of Social Robotics 3(1), 53-67 (2011)
4. Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., Powers, A.: Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Lisbon, Portugal (2003)
5. Duffy, B.R.: Anthropomorphism and the Social Robot, Special Issue on Socially Interactive Robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42(3-4), 31 (2003)
6. Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H.: An approach for a social robot to understand human relationships- Friendship estimation through interaction with robots. Interaction Studies 7(3), 369-403 (2006)
7. Nass, C., Steuer, J.: Anthropomorphism, Agency, and Ethopoeia: Computers as Social Actors. Human Communication Research 19(4), 504-527 (1993)
8. Reeves, B., Nass, C.: Media equation: how people treat computer, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)
9. Piaget, J.: The child's conception of the world. Littlefield Adams, Savage (1929)
10. Okita, S.Y., Schwartz, D.L.: Young Children's Understanding of Animacy Entertainment Robots. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 3(3), 393-412 (2006)
11. Carey, S.: Conceptual Change in Childhood. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)
12. Okita, S., Schwartz, D., Shibata, T., Nakamura, O., Tokuda, H.: Exploring Young Children's Attributions through Entertainment Robots. In: 14th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Nashville, TN (2005)
13. Hall, B., Henningsen, D.: Social facilitation and human-computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 2965-2971 (2008)
14. DiSalvo, C., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S.: All robots are not created equal: The design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In: Proceedings of DIS 2002, pp. 322-323. ACM Press, New York (2002)
15. McCroskey, J.C., McCain, T.A.: The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs 41, 261-266 (1974)
16. Moon, Y.: Similarity effects in human-computer interaction: Effects of user personality, computer personality, and user control on attraction and attributions of responsibility, Unpublished doctorial dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (1996)
17. Lee, K.M., Peng, W., Yan, C., Jin, S.: Can Robots Manifest Personality? An Empirical Test of Personality Recognition, Social Responses, and Social Presence in Human-Robot Interaction. Journal of Communication 56, 754-772 (2006)
18. Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric Theory. McGraw Hill, New York (1967)
19. Mori, M.: The uncanny valley. Energy 7(4), 33-35 (1970)
20. Woods, S.: Exploring the Design Space of Robots: Children's Perspectives. Interacting with Computers 18, 1390-1418 (2006)
21. Blow, M., Dautenhaun, K., Appleby, A., Nehaniv, C.L., Lee, D.: The art of designing robot faces: Dimensions for human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of HRI 2006, pp. 331-332. ACM Press, New York (2006)
22. Hanson, D.: Exploring the aesthetic range of humanoid robots (electronic resource). In: Proceedings of the ICCS/CogSci2006 Long Symposium: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science, pp. 16-20. Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver (2006)
23. DiSalvo, C., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S.: All robots are not created equal: The design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In: Proceedings of DIS 2002, pp. 321-326. ACM Press, New York (2002)
24. Green, R.D., MacDorman, K.F., Ho, C.C., Vasudevan, S.K.: Sensitivity to the proportions of faces that vary in human likeness. Computers in Human Behavior 24(5), 2456-2474 (2008)
25. Hall, J.A., Matsumoto, D.: Gender differences in judgments of multiple emotions from facial expressions. Emotion 4(2), 201-206 (2004)
26. Lytton, H., Romney, D.M.: Parents' differential socialization of boys and girls: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin 109(2), 267-296 (1991)
27. Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R.: The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition 19(6), 161-176 (2001)
28. Rudman, L.A., Goodwin, S.A.: Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do women like women more than men like men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87, 494-509 (2004)
29. MacDorman, K., Coram, J., Ho, C., Patel, H.: Gender differences in the impact of presentational factors in human character animation on decisions in ethical dilemmas. Presence 19(3), 213-229 (2010)