Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students

American Educational Research Journal

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 938-964

  Vaughn, Sharon ^a   Klingner, Janette K ^b   Swanson, Elizabeth A ^a   Boardman, Alison G ^b   Roberts, Greg ^a   Mohammed, Sarojani S ^a   Stillman Spisak, Stephanie J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Children at risk; Learning disabilities; Longitudinal developmental work; Reading failure; School failure

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960294233     PISSN: 00028312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0002831211410305     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Reading between the lines: What the ACT reveals about college readiness in reading. Iowa City, IA: Author; 2006:.
2. AIMSweb Reading-Curriculum Based Measurement. (2007). Retrieved from http://www.aimsweb.com/products/cbm.php.
3. Biancarosa G.,Snow C.E.Reading next-A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report from Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education; 2004:.
4. Bloom H.S.,Hill C.J.,Black A.R.,Lipsey M.W.Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions.Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness. 2008;1:289-328.
5. Bollen K.A.,Curran P.J.Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. New York, NY: John Wiley; 2006:.
6. Bovaird J.A.Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies. Little T.D.Bovaird J.A.Card N.A., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007:149-182.
7. Bryant D.P.,Vaughn S.,Linan-Thompson S.,Ugel N.,Hamff A.,Hougen M.Reading outcomes for students with and without reading disabilities in general education middle-school content area classes.Learning Disability Quarterly. 2000;23:238-252.
8. Cohen P.Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions. Collins L.M.Horn J.L., ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1991:18-30.
9. De La Paz S.,MacArthur C.Knowing the how and why of history: Expectations for secondary students with and without learning disabilities.Learning Disabilities Quarterly. 2003;26:142-154.
10. Dole J.A.,Duffy G.G.,Roehler L.R.,Pearson P.D.Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction.Review of Educational Research. 1991;61:239-264.
11. Edmonds M.S.,Vaughn S.,Wexler J.,Reutebuch C.K.,Cable A.,Tackett K.K.,Schnakenberg J.W.Synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading outcomes for older struggling readers.Review of Educational Research. 2009;79:262-300.
12. Enders C.K.,Bandalos D.L.The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models.Structural Equation Modeling. 2001;8:430-457.
13. Flavell J.H.Cognitive development. 3rd ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1992:.
14. Fuchs D.,Fuchs L.S.,Mathes P.G.,Lipsey M.W.Contemporary special education research. Gersten R.Schiller E.P.Vaughn S., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000:81-104.
15. Gajria M.,Jitendra A.K.,Sood S.,Sacks S.Comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis.Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2007;40:210-225.
16. Garet M.S.,Porter A.C.,Desimone L.,Birman B.F.,Yoon K.S.What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers.American Educational Research Journal. 2001;38:915-945.
17. Gates A.I.,MacGinitie W.H.Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests. 4th ed.Boston, MA: Riverside; 2000:.
18. Gersten R.,Fuchs L.S.,Williams J.P.,Baker S.Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research.Review of Educational Research. 2001;71:279-320.
19. Harris K.R.,Pressley M.The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction.Exceptional Children. 1991;57:392-404.
20. Heilman A.W.,Blair T.R.,Rupley W.H.Principles and practices of teaching reading. 9th ed.Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall; 1998:.
21. Howe K.B.,Shinn M.M.Standard reading assessment passages (RAPs) for use in general outcome measurement: A manual describing development and technical features. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation; 2002:.
22. James-Burdumy S.,Mansfield W.,Deke J.,Carey N.,Lugo-Gil J.,Hershey J.,Faddis B.Effectiveness of selected supplemental reading comprehension interventions: Impacts on a first cohort of fifth-grade students. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education; 2009:.
23. Jenkins J.R.,Heliotis J.,Stein M.L.,Haynes M.Improving reading comprehension by using paragraph restatements.Exceptional Children. 1987;54:54-59.
24. Jiménez R.T.,Garcia G.E.,Pearson P.D.Three children, two languages, and strategic reading: Case studies in bilingual/monolingual reading.American Educational Research Journal. 1995;32:67-97.
25. Jiménez R.T.,García G.E.,Pearson P.D.The reading strategies of bilingual Latina/o students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles.Reading Research Quarterly. 1996;31:90-112.
26. Kamil M.L.Adolescents and literacy: Reading for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education; 2003:.
27. KamilM. L.BormanG. D.DoleJ.KralC. C.SalingerT.TorgesenJ. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE No. 2008-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practiceguides/adlit_pg_082608.pdf.
28. Kim A.-H.,Vaughn S.,Klingner J.K.,Woodruff A.L.,Klein C.,Kouzekanani K.Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students with disabilities through computer-Assisted collaborative strategic reading (CACSR).Remedial and Special Education. 2006;27:235-248.
29. Kim A.-H.,Vaughn S.,Wanzek J.,Wei S.Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A synthesis of research.Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2004;37:105-118.
30. Klingner J.K.,Arguelles M.E.,Hughes M.T.,Vaughn S.Examining the schoolwide "spread" of research-based practices.Learning Disability Quarterly. 2001;24:221-234.
31. Klingner J.K.,Vaughn S.Promoting reading comprehension, content learning, and English acquisition through collaborative strategic reading (CSR).The Reading Teacher. 1999;52:738-747.
32. Klingner J.K.,Vaughn S.,Argüelles M.E.,Hughes M.T.,Ahwee S.Collaborative strategic reading: "Real world" lessons from classroom teachers.Remedial and Special Education. 2004;25:291-302.
33. Klingner J.K.,Vaughn S.,Boardman A.Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning difficulties. New York, NY: Guilford; 2007:.
34. Klingner J.K.,Vaughn S.,Schumm J.S.Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms.Elementary School Journal. 1998;99:3-21.
35. LonbergerR. B. (1988). The effects of training in a self-generated learning strategy on the prose-processing abilities of fourth and sixth graders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). State University of New York, Buffalo.
36. Maccini P.,Gagnon J.C.,Hughes C.A.Technology-based interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities.Learning Disability Quarterly. 2002;25:247-262.
37. MacGinitie W.H.,MacGinitie R.K.,Maria K.,Dreyer L.G.Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests. 4th ed.Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing; 2002:.
38. Mastropieri M.A.,Scruggs T.E.,Bakken J.P.,Whedon C.Reading comprehension: A synthesis of research in learning disabilities.Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities. 1996;10:201-227.
39. Mastropieri M.A.,Scruggs T.E.,Graetz J.E.Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenges for struggling students and teachers.Learning Disabilities Quarterly. 2003;26 (2): 103-116.
40. McKeown M.G.,Beck I.L.,Blake R.G. K.Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches.Reading Research Quarterly. 2009;44:218-253.
41. Mehta P.D.,Neale M.C.People are variables too: Multilevel structural equations models.Psychological Methods. 2005;10:259-284.
42. Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the sub-groups. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Health; 2000:.
43. Palincsar A.S.,Brown A.L.The reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities.Cognition and Instruction. 1984;1:117-175.
44. Paris A.H.,Lipson M.Y.,Wixson K.K.Becoming a strategic reader.Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1983;8:293-316.
45. Paris A.H.,Wasik B.A.,Turner J.C.Handbook of reading research. Barr R.Kamil M.L.Mosenthal B.P.Pearson P.D., ed. London: Routledge; 1991:609-640.
46. Perez B.Sociocultural contexts of language and literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998:.
47. Pressley M.,Afflerbach P.Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1995:.
48. Raphael T.E.Question-answering strategies for children.Reading Teacher. 1982;36:186-190.
49. Raudenbush S.W.Statistical analysis and optimal design for cluster randomized trials.Psychological Methods. 1997;2:173-185.
50. Rossi P.H.,Lipsey M.W.,Freeman H.E.Evaluation: A systematic approach. 7th ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004:.
51. ScammaccaN.RobertsG.VaughnS.EdmondsM. S.WexlerJ.ReutebuchC. K.TorgesenJ. K. (2007). Interventions for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implications for practice. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction. Retrieved from http://www.centeroninstruction.org/files/Meta-analysis%20Struggling%20Readers1.pdf.
52. Schmitt M.C.The effects of an elaborated directed activity on the metacomprehension skills of third graders.; 1988; 1988. 167.
53. Swanson H.L.,Hoskyn M.,Lee C.Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcome. New York, NY: Guilford; 1999:.
54. Swanson H.L.,Kehler P.,Jerman O.Working memory, strategy knowledge, and strategy instruction in children with reading disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2010;43:24-27.
55. Talbott E.,Lloyd J.W.,Tankersley M.Effects of reading comprehension interventions for students with learning disabilities.Learning Disability Quarterly. 1994;17:223-232.
56. Torgesen J.K.,Wagner R.K.,Rashotte C.A.The Test of Word Reading Efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1999:.
57. Vaughn S.,Chard D.J.,Bryant D.P.,Coleman M.,Tyler B.,Linan-Thompson S.,Kouzekanani K.Fluency and comprehension interventions for third-grade students.Remedial and Special Education. 2000;21:325-335.
58. Vaughn S.,Cirino P.T.,Wanzek J.,Wexler J.,Fletcher J.M.,Denton S., et al.Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention.School Psychology Review. 2010;39 (1): 3-21.
59. Vaughn S.,Gersten R.,Chard D.J.The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses.Exceptional Children. 2000;67:99-114.
60. Vaughn S.,Hughes M.T.,Schumm J.S.,Klingner J.K.A collaborative effort to enhance reading and writing instruction in inclusion classrooms.Learning Disability Quarterly. 1998;21:57-74.
61. Vaughn S.,Wanzek J.,Woodruff T.,Linan-Thompson S.Response to intervention. Haager D.Vaughn S.Klingner J.K., ed. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing;.
62. Vygotsky L.S.Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978:.
63. Wagner R.C.,Torgesen J.K.,Rashotte C.A.,Pearson N.A.Test of Silent Reading Efficiency and Comprehension. Austin, TX: Pro Ed; 2010:.
64. Williams J.P.Improving comprehension of disabled readers.Annals of Dyslexia. 1998;48:213-238.
65. Williams J.P.Strategic processing of text: Improving reading comprehension for students with learning disabilities. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children; 2000:.
66. Wilson V.L.,Rupley W.H.A structural equation model for reading comprehension based on background, phonemic, and strategy knowledge.Scientific Studies of Reading. 1997;1:45-63.
67. Wong B.Y. L.,Jones W.Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questing training.Learning Disability Quarterly. 1982;5:228-240.
68. Yoon K.S.,Duncan T.,Lee S.W.,Scarloss B.,Shapley K.L.Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues and Answers REL 33). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education; 2007:.