Technology-based practices for secondary students with learning disabilities

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 247-261

  Maccini, Paula ^a   Gagnon, Joseph Calvin ^b   Hughes, Charles A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036758179     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1511356     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson-Inman, L., Knox-Quinn, C., & Homey, M.A. (1996). Computer-based study strategies for students with learning disabilities: Individual differences associated with adoption level. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 461-484
2. Bender, W.N. (2001). Learning disabilities: Characteristics, identification, and teaching strategies (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
3. Bottge, B., & Hasselbring, T.S. (1993). A comparison of two approaches for teaching complex, authentic mathematics problems to adolescents in remedial math classes. Exceptional Children, 59, 556-566
4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates
5. Fisher, J.B., Schumaker, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. (1996). Searching for validated inclusive practices: A review of the literature. In E.L. Meyen, G.A. Vergason, & R.J. Whelan (Eds.), Strategies for teaching exceptional children in inclusive settings (pp. 123-154). Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company
6. Forness, S.R., Kavale, K.A., Blum, I.M., & Lloyd, J.W. (1997). Analysis of meta-analyses: What works in special education and related services. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29, 4-9
7. Greenwood, C.R., & Rieth, H.J. (1996). Current dimensions of technology-based assessment in special education. In E.L. Meyen, G.A. Vergason, & R.J. Whelan (Eds.), Strategies for teaching exceptional children in inclusive settings (pp. 279-292). Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company
8. Guptill, A.M. (2000). Using the Internet to improve student performance. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32, 16-20
9. Hallahan, D.P., Kauffman, J.M., & Lloyd, J.W. (1985). Introduction to teaming disabilities (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
10. Hasselbring, E., Sherwood, R., & Bransford, J. (1986). An evaluation of the Mastering Fractions Level One instructional videodisc program. Unpublished manuscript, George Peabody College, Nashville
11. Higgins, K., & Boone, R. (1990). Hypertext computer study guides and the social studies achievement of students with learning disabilities, remedial students, and regular education students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 529-540
12. Higgins, K., Boone, R., & Lovitt, T.C. (1996). Hypertext support for remedial students and students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 402-412
13. Horton, S.V., Boone, R.A., & Lovitt, T.C. (1990). Teaching social studies to learning disabled high school students: Effects of a hypertext study guide. British Journal of Educational Technology, 21, 118-131
14. Horton, S.V., & Lovitt, T.C. (1994). A comparison of into methods of administering group reading inventories to diverse learners: Computer versus paper and pencil. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 378-390
15. Horton, S.V., Lovitt, T.C., Givens, A., & Nelson, R. (1989). Teaching social studies to high school students with academic handicaps in a mainstreamed setting: Effects of a computerized study guide. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 102-107
16. Horton, S.V., Lovitt, T.C., & Slocum, T. (1988). Teaching geography to high school students with academic deficits: Effects of a computerized map tutorial. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 371-379
17. Hudson, P., Lignugaris-Kraft, B., & Miller, T. (1993). Using content enhancements to improve the performance of adolescents with learning disabilities in content classes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 106-126
18. Kelly, B., Carnine, D., Gersten, R., & Grossen, B. (1986). The effectiveness of videodisc instruction in teaching fractions to learning-disabled and remedial high school students. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8, 5-17
19. Kelly, B., Gersten, R., & Carnine, D. (1990). Student error patterns as a function of curriculum design: Teaching fractions to remedial high school students and high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 23-29
20. Komoski, K. (1995). Seven steps to responsible software selection. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology. (ERIC Digest No EDO-IR-95-6)
21. Lewis, R.B. (1998). Assistive technology and learning disabilities: Today’s realities and tomorrow’s promises. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 16-26
22. Lock, R.H., & Carlson, D.M. (2000). Planning for effective, enjoyable computer lab use. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32, 4-7
23. Maccini, P., & Gagnon, J.C. (2000). Best practices for teaching mathematics to secondary students with special needs: Implications from teacher perceptions and a review of the literature. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(5), 1-22
24. Mathews, D., Pracek, E., & Olson, J. (2000). Technology for teaching and learning. In J.L. Olson & M.M. Platt (Eds.), Teaching children and adolescents with special needs (3rd ed., pp. 322-346). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill
25. McNaughton, D., Hughes, C., & Ofiesh, N. (1997). Proofreading for students with learning disabilities: Integrating computer and strategy use. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 16-28
26. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author
27. Rekrut, M.D. (1999). Using the Internet in classroom instruction: A primer for teachers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42, 546-557
28. Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M.C. Witrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376-391). New York: Macmillan
29. Systems Impact Inc. (1985). Mastering fractions. Washington, DC: Author
30. Torgesen, J.K., Dahlem, W.E., & Greenstein, J. (1987). Using verbatim text recordings to enhance reading comprehension in learning disabled adolescents. Learning Disabilities Focus, 3, 30-38
31. U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Twenty-second annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author
32. Vergason, G.A., & Anderegg, M.L. (1997). Dictionary of special education and rehabilitation (4th ed.). Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company
33. Wagner, M.M., & Blackorby, J. (1996). Transition from high school to work or college: How special education students fare. Future of Children, 6(1), 103-120