Proteins implicated in mediating self-incompatibility-induced alterations to the actin cytoskeleton of Papaver pollen

Annals of Botany

Volumn 108, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 659-675

  Poulter, Natalie S ^a   Bosch, Maurice ^a,b   Franklin Tong, Vernonica E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Actin cytoskeleton; actin binding proteins; mass spectrometry; Papaver rhoeas; pollen; self incompatibility; signalling

Indexed keywords

VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

AUTOGAMY; CYTOLOGY; DICOTYLEDON; ENZYME ACTIVITY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; OUTCROSSING; POLLEN; PROTEIN; SELF INCOMPATIBILITY; SEXUAL REPRODUCTION;

ACTIN FILAMENT; APOPTOSIS; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; METABOLISM; PAPAVER; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; REVIEW; SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY (PLANT);

ACTIN CYTOSKELETON; APOPTOSIS; PAPAVER; PLANT PROTEINS; POLLEN; SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY IN FLOWERING PLANTS;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA; PAPAVER; PAPAVER RHOEAS;

EID: 79960271939     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr022     Document Type: Review

References (126)

1. Allwood EG, Anthony RG, Smertenko AP, et al. 2002. Regulation of the pollen-specific actin-depolymerizing factor LlADF1. The Plant Cell 14: 2915-2927.
2. Almeida Engler JD, Van Poucke K, Karimi M, et al. 2004. Dynamic cytoskeleton rearrangements in giant cells and syncytia of nematode-infected roots. The Plant Journal 38: 12-26.
3. Andrianantoandro E, Pollard TD. 2006. Mechanism of actin filament turnover by severing and nucleation at different concentrations of ADF/ cofilin. Molecular Cell 24: 13-23.
4. Balcer HI, Goodman AL, Rodal AA, et al. 2003. Coordinated regulation of actin filament turnover by a high-molecular-weight Srv2/CAP complex, cofilin, profilin, and Aip1. Current Biology 13: 2159-2169.
5. Bamburg JR. 1999. Proteins of the ADF/cofilin family: Essential regulators of actin dynamics. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 15: 185-230.
6. Bamburg JR, Bernstein BW. 2008. ADF/cofilin. Current Biology 18: R273-R275.
7. Barrero RA, Umeda M, Yamamura S, Uchimiya H. 2002. Arabidopsis CAP regulates the actin cytoskeleton necessary for plant cell elongation and division. The Plant Cell 14: 149-163.
8. Binet MN, Humbert C, Lecourieux D, Vantard M, Pugin A. 2001. Disruption of microtubular cytoskeleton induced by cryptogein, an elicitor of hypersensitive response in tobacco cells. Plant Physiology 125: 564-572.
9. Bonneau L, Ge Y, Drury GE, Gallois P. 2008. What happened to plant caspases? Journal of Experimental Botany 59: 491-499.
10. Boren M, Hoglund A-S, Bozhkov P, Jansson C. 2006. Developmental regulation of a VEIDase caspase-like proteolytic activity in barley caryopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 3747-3753.
11. Bosch M, Franklin-Tong VE. 2007. Temporal and spatial activation of caspase-like enzymes induced by self-incompatibility in Papaver pollen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104: 18327-18332.
12. Bouquin T, Mattsson O, Naested H, Foster R, Mundy J. 2003. The Arabidopsis lue1 mutant defines a katanin p60 ortholog involved in hormonal control of microtubule orientation during cell growth. Journal of Cell Science 116: 791-801.
13. Bozhkov PV, Filonova LH, Suarez MF, et al. 2004. VEIDase is a principal caspase-like activity involved in plant programmed cell death and essential for embryonic pattern formation. Cell Death and Differentiation 11: 175-182.
14. Burk DH, Ye ZH. 2002. Alteration of oriented deposition of cellulose microfibrils by mutation of a katanin-like microtubule-severing protein. The Plant Cell 14: 2145-2160.
15. Burk DH, Liu B, Zhong RQ, Morrison WH, Ye ZH. 2001. A katanin-like protein regulates normal cell wall biosynthesis and cell elongation. The Plant Cell 13: 807-827.
16. Cahill D, Rookes J, Michalczyk A, McDonald K, Drake A. 2002. Microtubule dynamics in compatible and incompatible interactions of soybean hypocotyl cells with Phytophthora sojae. Plant Pathology 51: 629-640.
17. Cai G, Cresti M. 2009. Organelle motility in the pollen tube: A tale of 20 years. Journal of Experimental Botany 60: 495-508.
18. Carlier MF, Laurent V, Santolini J, et al. 1997. Actin depolymerizing factor (ADF/Cofilin) enhances the rate of filament turnover: Implication in actinbased motility. Journal of Cell Biology 136: 1307-1322.
19. Chaudhry F, Guérin C, von Witsch M, Blanchoin L, Staiger C. 2007. Identification of Arabidopsis cyclase-associated protein 1 as the first nucleotide exchange factor for plant actin. Molecular Biology of the Cell 18: 3002-3014.
20. Chen CY, Wong EI, Vidali L, et al. 2002. The regulation of actin organization by actin-depolymerizing factor in elongating pollen tubes. The Plant Cell 14: 2175-2190.
21. Cheung AY, Chen CY-H, Tao L-Z, Andreyeva T, Twell D, Wu H-M. 2003. Regulation of pollen tube growth by Rac-like GTPases. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 73-81.
22. Chua BT, Volbracht C, Tan KO, Li R, Yu VC, Li P. 2003. Mitochondrial translocation of cofilin is an early step in apoptosis induction. Nature Cell Biology 5: 1083-1089.
23. Collings D, Allen NS. 2000. Cortical actin interacts with the plasma membrane and microtubules. In: Staiger CJ, Volkmann D, Barlow PW, eds. Actin: A dynamic framework for multiple plant cell functions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
24. Danon A, Rotari VI, Gordon A, Mailhac N, Gallois P. 2004. Ultraviolet-C overexposure induces programmed cell death in arabidopsis, which is mediated by caspase-like activities and which can be suppressed by caspase inhibitors, p35 and defender against apoptotic death. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279: 779-787.
25. Deeks MJ, Rodrigues C, Dimmock S, et al. 2007. Arabidopsis CAP1 a key regulator of actin organisation and development. Journal of Cell Science 120: 2609-2618.
26. Dhonukshe P, Laxalt AM, Goedhart J, Gadella TWJ, Munnik T. 2003. Phospholipase D activation correlates with microtubule reorganization in living plant cells. The Plant Cell 15: 2666-2679.
27. Dos Remedios CG, Chhabra D, Kekic M, et al. 2003. Actin binding proteins: Regulation of cytoskeletal microfilaments. Physiological Reviews 83: 433-473.
28. Ellis RJ. 1996. Chaperonins: Introductory perspective. In: Ellis RJ, ed. The chaperonins. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29. Ellis RJ, Vandervies SM. 1991. Molecular chaperones. Annual Review of Biochemistry 60: 321-347.
30. Erhardt DW, Shaw SL. 2006. Microtubule dynamics and organization in plant cortical array. Annual Review of Plant Biology 57: 859-875.
31. Eun SO, Lee Y. 2000. Stomatal opening by fusicoccin is accompanied by depolymerization of actin filaments in guard cells. Planta 210: 1014-1017.
32. Fenton WA, Kashi Y, Furtak K, Horwich AL. 1994. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature 371: 614-619.
33. Foote HCC, Ride JP, Franklin-Tong VE, Walker EA, Lawrence MJ, Franklin FCH. 1994. Cloning and expression of a distinctive class of self- incompatibility (S) gene from Papaver rhoeas L. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 91: 2265-2269.
34. Franklin-Tong VE. 2008. Self-Incompatibility in Papaver rhoeas: Progress in understanding mechanisms involved in regulating self-incompatibility in Papaver. In: Franklin-Tong VE, ed. Self-incompatibility in flowering plants - evolution, diversity, and mechanisms. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
35. Franklin-Tong VE, Gourlay CW. 2008. A role for actin in regulating apoptosis/ programmed cell death: Evidence spanning yeast, plants and animals. Biochemistry Journal 413: 389-404.
36. Freeman NL, Field J. 2000. Mammalian homolog of the yeast cyclase associated protein, CAP/Srv2p, regulates actin filament assembly. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 45: 106-120.
37. Frydman J. 2001. Folding of newly translated proteins in vivo: The role of molecular chaperones. Annual Review of Biochemistry 70: 603-647.
38. Fu Y, Gu Y, Zheng ZL, Wasteneys G, Yang ZB. 2005. Arabidopsis interdigitating cell growth requires two antagonistic pathways with opposing action on cell morphogenesis. Cell 120: 687-700.
39. Gao Y, Thomas JO, Chow RL, Lee G-H, Cowan NJ. 1992. A cytoplasmic chaperonin that catalyzes [beta]-actin folding. Cell 69: 1043-1050.
40. Gardiner J, Marc J. 2003. Putative microtubule-associated proteins from the Arabidopsis genome. Protoplasma 222: 61-74.
41. Gardiner JC, Harper JDI, Weerakoon ND, et al. 2001. A 90-kD phospholipase D from tobacco binds to microtubules and the plasma membrane. The Plant Cell 13: 2143-2158.
42. Geitmann A, Snowman, Benjamin N, Emons AMC, Franklin-Tong VE. 2000. Alterations in the actin cytoskeleton of pollen tubes are induced by the self-incompatibility reaction in Papaver rhoeas. The Plant Cell 12: 1239-1252.
43. Glenney J Jr, Kaulfus P, Matsudaira P,Weber K. 1981. F-actin binding and bundling properties of fimbrin, a major cytoskeletal protein of microvillus core filaments. Journal of Biological Chemistry 256: 9283-9288.
44. Gohla A, Bokoch GM. 2002. 14-3-3 regulates actin dynamics by stabilizing phosphorylated cofilin. Current Biology 12: 1704-1710.
45. Goode BL, Drubin DG, Barnes G. 2000. Functional cooperation between the microtubule and actin cytoskeletons. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 12: 63-71.
46. Gourlay CW, Carpp LN, Timpson P, Winder SJ, Ayscough KR. 2004. A role for the actin cytoskeleton in cell death and aging in yeast. Journal of Cell Biology 164: 803-809.
47. de Graaf BHJ, Cheung AY, Andreyeva T, Levasseur K, Kieliszewski M, Wu H-m. 2005. Rab11 GTPase-regulated membrane trafficking is crucial for tip-focused pollen tube growth in tobacco. The Plant Cell 17: 2564-2579.
48. Gross P, Julius C, Schmelzer E, Hahlbrock K. 1993. Translocation of cytoplasm and nucleus to fungal penetration sites is associated with deploymerization of microtubules and defense gene activation in infected, cultured parsley cells. EMBO Journal 12: 1735-1744.
49. Gungabissoon RA, Jiang CJ, Drøbak BK, Maciver SK, Hussey PJ. 1998. Interaction of maize actin-depolymerising factor with actin and phosphoinositides and its inhibition of plant phospholipase C. The Plant Journal 16: 689-696.
50. Hardham AR, Takemoto D, White RG. 2008. Rapid and dynamic subcellular reorganization following mechanical stimulation of Arabidopsis epidermal cells mimics responses to fungal and oomycete attack. BMC Plant Biology 8: 63. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-8-63
51. Hatsugai N, Iwasaki S, Tamura K, et al. 2009. A novel membrane fusionmediated plant immunity against bacterial pathogens. Genes & Development 23: 2496-2506.
52. Hill JE, Hemmingsen SM. 2001. Arabidopsis thaliana type I and II chaperonins. Cell Stress & Chaperones 6: 190-200.
53. Ho AYY, Day DA, Brown MH, Marc J. 2009. Arabidopsis phospholipase D delta as an initiator of cytoskeleton-mediated signalling to fundamental cellular processes. Functional Plant Biology 36: 190-198.
54. Huang S, Blanchoin L, Chaudhry F, Franklin-Tong VE, Staiger CJ. 2004. A gelsolin-like protein from Papaver rhoeas pollen (PrABP80) stimulates calcium-regulated severing and depolymerization of actin filaments. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279: 23364-23375.
55. Huang S, Robinson RC, Gao LY, et al. 2005. Arabidopsis VILLIN1 generates actin filament cables that are resistant to depolymerization. The Plant Cell 17: 486-501.
56. Huang SL, Jin LF, Du JZ, et al. 2007. SB401, a pollen-specific protein from Solanum berthaultii, binds to and bundles microtubules and F-actin. The Plant Journal 51: 406-418.
57. Hussey PJ, Ketelaar T, Deeks MJ. 2006. Control of the actin cytoskeleton in plant cell growth. Annual Review of Plant Biology 57: 109-125.
58. Iden S, Collard JG. 2008. Crosstalk between small GTPases and polarity proteins in cell polarization. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 9: 846-859.
59. Igarashi H, Orii H, Mori H, Shimmen T, Sonobe S. 2000. Isolation of a novel 190 kDa protein from tobacco BY-2 cells: Possible involvement in the interaction between actin filaments and microtubules. Plant and Cell Physiology 41: 920-931.
60. Ishihama Y, Oda Y, Tabata T, et al. 2005. Exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 4: 1265-1272.
61. Jin J, Smith FD, Stark C, et al. 2004. Proteomic, functional, and domainbased analysis of in vivo 14-3-3 binding proteins involved in cytoskeletal regulation and cellular organization. Current Biology 14: 1436-1450.
62. Jordan ND, Franklin FCH, Franklin-Tong VE. 2000. Evidence for DNA fragmentation triggered in the self- incompatibility response in pollen of Papaver rhoeas. The Plant Journal 23: 471-479.
63. Kadota A, Wada M. 1992. The circular arrangement of cortical microtubules around the subapex of tip-growing fern protonemata is sensitive to cytochalasin-B. Plant and Cell Physiology 33: 99-102.
64. Khurana P, Henty JL, Huang S, Staiger AM, Blanchoin L, Staiger CJ. 2010. Arabidopsis VILLIN1 and VILLIN3 have overlapping and distinct activities in actin bundle formation and turnover. The Plant Cell 22: 2727-2748.
65. Kotchoni SO, Zakharova T, Mallery EL, Le J, El-Assal SE-D, Szymanski DB. 2009. The association of the arabidopsis actin-related protein2/3 complex with cell membranes is linked to its assembly status but not its activation. Plant Physiology 151: 2095-2109.
66. Kovar DR, Drobak BK, Staiger CJ. 2000a. Maize profilin isoforms are functionally distinct. The Plant Cell 12: 583-598.
67. Kovar DR, Staiger CJ, Weaver EA, McCurdy DW. 2000b. AtFim1 is an actin filament crosslinking protein from Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 24: 625-636.
68. Kovar DR, Harris ES, Mahaffy R, Higgs HN, Pollard TD. 2006. Control of the assembly of ATP- and ADP-actin by formins and profilin. Cell 124: 423-435.
69. Koyasu S, Nishida E, Kadowaki T, et al. 1986. Two mammalian heat shock proteins, HSP90 and HSP100, are actin-binding proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 83: 8054-8058.
70. Kurup S, Ride JP, Jordan N, Fletcher G, Franklin-Tong VE, Franklin FCH. 1998. Identification and cloning of related self-incompatibility S-genes in Papaver rhoeas and Papaver nudicaule. Sexual Plant Reproduction 11: 192-198.
71. Lazaro-Dieguez F, Aguado C, Mato E, et al. 2008. Dynamics of an F-actin aggresome generated by the actin-stabilizing toxin jasplakinolide. Journal of Cell Science 121: 1415-1425.
72. Lee S, Dominguez R. 2010. Regulation of actin cytoskeleton dynamics in cells. Molecules and Cells 29: 311-325.
73. Liang P, MacRae T. 1997. Molecular chaperones and the cytoskeleton. Journal of Cell Science 110: 1431-1440.
74. Lila T, Drubin DG. 1997. Evidence for physical and functional interactions among two Saccharomyces cerevisiae SH3 domain proteins, an adenylyl cyclase-associated protein and the actin cytoskeleton. Molecular Biology of the Cell 8: 367-385.
75. Liu BQ, Jin LF, Zhu L, Li JJ, Huang SL, Yuan M. 2009. Phosphorylation of microtubule-associated protein SB401 from Solanum berthaultii regulates its effect on microtubules. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 51: 235-242.
76. Lovy-Wheeler A, Kunkel JG, Allwood EG, Hussey PJ, Hepler PK. 2006. Oscillatory increases in alkalinity anticipate growth and may regulate actin dynamics in pollen tubes of lily. The Plant Cell 18: 2182-2193.
77. Macejak DG, Luftig RB. 1991. Stabilization of actin filaments at early times after adenovirus infection and in heat-shocked cells. Virus Research 19: 31-45.
78. Malerba M, Contran N, Tonelli M, Crosti P, Cerana R. 2008. Role of nitric oxide in actin depolymerization and programmed cell death induced by fusicoccin in sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus) cultured cells. Physiologia Plantarum 133: 449-457.
79. Martin SG, McDonald WH, Yates JR, Chang F. 2005. Tea4p links microtubule plus ends with the formin for3p in the establishment of cell polarity. Developmental Cell 8: 479-491.
80. Melki R, Cowan NJ. 1994. Facilitated folding of actins and tubulins occurs via a nucleotide-dependent interaction between cytoplasmic chaperonin and distinctive folding intermediates. Molecular Cell Biology 14: 2895-2904.
81. Michelot A, Derivery E, Paterski-Boujemaa R, et al. 2006. A novel mechanism for the formation of actin-filament bundles by a nonprocessive formin. Current Biology 16: 1924-1930.
82. Milioni D, Hatzopoulos P. 1997. Genomic organization of hsp90 gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Molecular Biology 35: 955-961.
83. Park SJ, Suetsugu S, Sagara H, Takenawa T. 2007. HSP90 cross-links branched actin filaments induced by N-WASP and the Arp2/3 complex. Genes to Cells 12: 611-622.
84. Petrásek J, Schwarzerová K. 2009. Actin and microtubule cytoskeleton interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 12: 728-734.
85. Pinto D, Boyd R, Volmer D. 2002. Ultra-high resolution for mass spectrometric analysis of complex and low-abundance mixtures - the emergence of FTICR-MS as an essential analytical tool. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 373: 378-389.
86. Poulter NS, Vatovec S, Franklin-Tong VE. 2008. Microtubules are a target for self-incompatibility signaling in Papaver pollen. Plant Physiology 146: 1358-1367.
87. Poulter NS, Staiger CJ, Rappoport JZ, Franklin-Tong VE. 2010. Actin-binding proteins implicated in formation of the punctate actin foci stimulated by the self-incompatibility response in Papaver. Plant Physiology 152: 1274-1283.
88. del Pozo O, Lam E. 1998. Caspases and programmed cell death in the hypersensitive response of plants to pathogens. Current Biology 8: 1129-1132.
89. Preuss ML, Kovar DR, Lee YRJ, Staiger CJ, Delmer DP, Liu B. 2004. A plant-specific kinesin binds to actin microfilaments and interacts with cortical microtubules in cotton fibers. Plant Physiology 136: 3945-3955.
90. Ravagnan L, Gurbuxani S, Susin SA, et al. 2001. Heat-shock protein 70 antagonizes apoptosis-inducing factor. Nature Cell Biology 3: 839-843.
91. Richael C, Lincoln JE, Bostock RM, Gilchrist DG. 2001. Caspase inhibitors reduce symptom development and limit bacterial proliferation in susceptible plant tissues. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 59: 213-221.
92. Ride JP, Davies EM, Franklin FCH, Marshall DF. 1999. Analysis of Arabidopsis genome sequence reveals a large new gene family in plants. Plant Molecular Biology 39: 927-932.
93. Sagot I, Pinson B, Salin B, Daignan-Fornier B. 2006. Actin bodies in yeast quiescent cells: An immediately available actin reserve? Molecular Biology of the Cell 17: 4645-4655.
94. Sanmartin M, Jaroszewski L, Raikhel NV, Rojo E. 2005. Caspases: Regulating death since the origin of life. Plant Physiology 137: 841-847.
95. Sedbrook JC. 2004. MAPs in plant cells: Delineating microtubule growth dynamics and organization. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7: 632-640.
96. Snowman BN, Kovar DR, Shevchenko G, Franklin-Tong VE, Staiger CJ. 2002. Signal-mediated depolymerization of actin in pollen during the self-incompatibility response. The Plant Cell 14: 2613-2626.
97. Song Q, Wei T, Lees-Miller S, Alnemri E, Watters D, Lavin M. 1997. Resistance of actin to cleavage during apoptosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94: 157-162.
98. Staiger CJ, Blanchoin L. 2006. Actin dynamics: Old friends with new stories. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 9: 554-562.
99. Staiger CJ, Poulter NS, Henty JL, Franklin-Tong VE, Blanchoin L. 2010. Regulation of actin dynamics by actin-binding proteins in pollen. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 1969-1986.
100. Stenmark H. 2009. Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 10: 513-525.
101. Sternlicht H, Farr GW, Sternlicht ML, Driscoll JK,Willison K, Yaffe MB. 1993. The t-complex polypeptide 1 complex is a chaperonin for tubulin and actin in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 90: 9422-9426.
102. Stoppin-Mellet V, Gaillard J, Vantard M. 2002. Functional evidence for in vitro microtubule severing by the plant katanin homologue. Biochemical Journal 365: 337-342.
103. Szumlanski AL, Nielsen E. 2009. The Rab GTPase RabA4d regulates pollen tube tip growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Cell 21: 526-544.
104. Takemoto D, Jones DA, Hardham AR. 2003. GFP-tagging of cell components reveals the dynamics of subcellular re-organization in response to infection of Arabidopsis by oomycete pathogens. The Plant Journal 33: 775-792.
105. Thomas C, Tholl S, Moes D, et al. 2009. Actin bundling in plants. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 66: 940-957.
106. Thomas SG, Franklin-Tong VE. 2004. Self-incompatibility triggers programmed cell death in Papaver pollen. Nature 429: 305-309.
107. Thomas SG, Huang S, Li S, Staiger CJ, Franklin-Tong VE. 2006. Actin depolymerization is sufficient to induce programmed cell death in selfincompatible pollen. Journal of Cell Biology 174: 221-229.
108. Timmers ACJ, Auriac MC, Truchet G. 1999. Refined analysis of early symbiotic steps of the Rhizobium-Medicago interaction in relationship with microtubular cytoskeleton rearrangements. Development 126: 3617-3628.
109. Vernoud V, Horton AC, Yang Z, Nielsen E. 2003. Analysis of the small GTPase gene superfamily of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 131: 1191-1208.
110. Vierling E. 1991. The roles of heat shock proteins in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 42: 579-620.
111. Walker EA, Ride JP, Kurup S, FranklinTong VE, Lawrence MJ, Franklin FCH. 1996. Molecular analysis of two functional homologues of the S-3 allele of the Papaver rhoeas self-incompatibility gene isolated from different populations. Plant Molecular Biology 30: 983-994.
112. Wang C, Zhou G-L, Vedantam S, Li P, Field J. 2008. Mitochondrial shuttling of CAP1 promotes actin- and cofilin-dependent apoptosis. Journal of Cell Science 121: 2913-2920.
113. Wang X, Zhu L, Liu BQ, et al. 2007. Arabidopsis MICROTUBULEASSOCIATED PROTEIN18 functions in directional cell growth by destabilizing cortical microtubules. The Plant Cell 19: 877-889.
114. Wang Z, Pesacreta TC. 2004. A subclass of myosin XI is associated with mitochondria, plastids, and the molecular chaperone subunit TCP-1a in maize. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 57: 218-232.
115. Wasteneys GO. 2003. Microtubules show their sensitive nature. Plant and Cell Physiology 44: 653-654.
116. Wasteneys GO, Galway ME. 2003. Remodelling the cytoskeleton for growth and form: An overview with some new views. Annual Review of Plant Biology 54: 691-722.
117. Weerasinghe RR, Collings DA, Johannes E, Allen NS. 2003. The distributional changes and role of microtubules in Nod factor-challenged Medicago sativa root hairs. Planta 218: 276-287.
118. Wheeler MJ, de Graaf BHJ, Hadjiosif N, et al. 2009. Identification of the pollen self-incompatibility determinant in Papaver rhoeas Nature 459: 992-995.
119. Wheeler MJ, Vatovec S, Franklin-Tong VE. 2010. The pollen S-determinant in Papaver: Comparisons with known plant receptor and protein ligand partners. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 2015-2025.
120. Woltering EJ, van der Bent A, Hoeberichts FA. 2002. Do plant caspases exist? Plant Physiology 130: 1764-1769.
121. Won J, Kim DY, La M, Kim D, Meadows GG, Joe CO. 2003. Cleavage of 14-3-3 protein by caspase-3 facilitates bad interaction with Bcl-x(L) during apoptosis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278: 19347-19351.
122. Xu T, Qu Z, Yang XY, et al. 2009. A cotton kinesin GhKCH2 interacts with both microtubules and microfilaments. Biochemical Journal 421: 171-180.
123. Ye J, Zheng Y, Yan A, et al. 2009. Arabidopsis formin3 directs the formation of actin cables and polarized growth in pollen tubes. The Plant Cell 21: 3868-3884.
124. Yokota E, Takahara K-I, Shimmen T. 1998. Actin-bundling protein isolated from pollen tubes of lily. Plant Physiology 116: 1421-1429.
125. Yokota SI, Yanagi H, Yura T, Kubota H. 2000. Upregulation of cytosolic chaperonin CCT subunits during recovery from chemical stress that causes accumulation of unfolded proteins. European Journal of Biochemistry 267: 1658-1664.
126. Zhang H, Qu X, Bao C, et al. 2010. Arabidopsis VILLIN5, an actin filament bundling and severing protein, is necessary for normal pollen tube growth. The Plant Cell 22: 2749-2767.