Remanence and survival of commercial yeast in different ecological niches of the vineyard

FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 429-437

  Cordero Bueso, Gustavo ^a   Arroyo, Teresa ^a   Serrano, Ana ^a   Valero, Eva ^b  

^a Instituto Madrileno de Investigacion y Desarrollo Rural   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Commercial yeast; Dissemination; Environment; Saccharomyces strains; Vineyard

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL DNA;

BARK; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMMERCIAL SPECIES; FOOD PROCESSING; LEAF; NICHE; SAMPLING; SOIL MICROORGANISM; SURVIVAL; VINE; VINEYARD; YEAST;

ARTICLE; BARK; CLASSIFICATION; ECOSYSTEM; FERMENTATION; FOOD CONTROL; GENETICS; GRAPE; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MICROBIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SOIL; SPAIN; WINE;

DNA, FUNGAL; ECOSYSTEM; FERMENTATION; FOOD MICROBIOLOGY; PLANT BARK; PLANT LEAVES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SOIL; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY; SPAIN; VITIS; WINE;

MADRID [SPAIN]; SPAIN;

SACCHAROMYCES; VITACEAE;

EID: 79960190091     PISSN: 01686496     EISSN: 15746941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01124.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bab'eva IP & Chernov IY (1995) Geographical aspects of yeast ecology. Physiol Genet Biol Rev 9: 1-54.
2. Barnett JA, Payne RW & Yarrow D (2000) Yeast: Characteristics and Identification, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Bely M, Sablayrolles JM & Barre P (1990) Automatic detection of assimilable nitrogen deficiencies during alcoholic fermentation in oenological conditions. J Ferment Bioeng 70: 246-252.
4. Comitini F & Ciani M (2006) Survival of inoculated Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain on wine grapes during two vintages. Lett Appl Microbiol 42: 248-253.
5. Cubillos FA, Vásquez C, Faugerón S, Ganga A & Martínez C (2009) Self-fertilization is the main sexual reproduction mechanism in native wine yeast populations. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 67: 162-170.
6. Fay JC & Benavides JA (2005) Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PloS Genet 1: e5.
7. Field D & Wills C (1998) Abundant microsatellite polymorphism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the different distributions of microsatellite in eight prokaryotes and S. cerevisiae, result from strong mutation pressure and a variety of selective forces. P Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 1647-1652.
8. Fleet GH (2008) Wine yeast for the future. FEMS Yeast Res 8: 979-995.
9. Francesca N, Chiurazzi M, Romano R, Aponte M, Settani L & Moschetti G (2010) Indigenous yeast communities in the environment of 'Rovello bianco' grape variety and their use in commercial white wine fermentation. World J Microb Biot 26: 337-351.
10. Glushakova AM & Chernov IY (2007) Seasonal dynamic of the numbers of epiphytic yeasts. Microbiology 76: 590-595.
11. Glushakova AM, Ivannikova VY, Naumova ES, Chernov IY & Naumov GI (2007) Massive isolation and identification of Saccharomyces paradoxus yeast from plant phyllosphere. Microbiology 76: 205-210.
12. Goddard MR, Anfang N, Tang R, Gardner RC & Jun C (2010) A distinct population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in New Zealand: evidence for local dispersal by insects and human-aided global dispersal in oak barrels. Environ Microbiol 12: 63-73.
13. González-Techera A, Jubany S, Carrau FM & Caggero C (2001) Differentiation of industrial wine yeast strains using microsatellite markers. Lett Appl Microbiol 33: 71-75.
14. Henschke P (2007) Yeast strains available for winemaking 2007-2008. Aust Wine Res Inst Technol Rev 171: 9-29.
15. Inácio J, Pereira P, de Carvalho M, Fonseca A, Amaral-Collaco MT & Spencer-Martins I (2002) Estimation and diversity of phylloplane mycrobiota on selected plants in a Mediterranean-type ecosystem in Portugal. Microb Ecol 44: 344-353.
16. IUSS Working Group WRB 2007 World Reference Base for Soil Resources. World Soil Resources Reports No 103. FAO, Rome.
17. Lindow SE & Brandl MT (2003) Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 1875-1883.
18. Marques MJ, García-Muñoz S, Muñoz-Organero G & Bienes R (2010) Soil conservation beneath grass cover in hillside vineyards under mediterranean climatic conditions (Madrid, Spain). Land Degrad Dev 21: 122-131.
19. Martini A (2003) Biotechnology of natural and winery-associated strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int Microbiol 6: 207-209.
20. Mortimer R & Polsinelli M (1999) On the origins of wine yeast. Res Microbiol 150: 199-204.
21. Palková Z & Váchová L (2006) Life within a community: benefit to yeast long-term survival. FEMS Microbiol Rev 30: 806-824.
22. Pretorius IS (2000) Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast 16: 675-729.
23. Pretorius IS & Hoj PB (2005) Grape and wine technology: challenges, opportunities and potential benefits. Aust J Grape Wine R 11: 83-108.
24. Renouf V, Claisse O & Lonvaud-Funel A (2005) Understanding the microbial ecosystem on the grape berry surface through numeration and identification of yeast and bacteria. Aust J Grape Wine R 11: 316-327.
25. Salinas F, Mandakovic D, Urzua U, Massera A, Miras S, Combina M, Ganga MA & Marínez C (2010) Genomic and phenotypic comparison between similar wine yeast strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from different geographic origins. J Appl Microbiol 108: 1850-1858.
26. Sampaio JP & Gonçalves P (2008) Natural populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzeii in Portugal are associated with oak bark and are sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. Appl Environ Microb 74: 2144-2152.
27. Schuller D & Casal M (2005) The use of genetically modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains in the wine industry. Appl Microbiol Biot 68: 292-304.
28. Schuller D, Alves H, Dequin S & Casal M (2005) Ecological survey of Saccharomyces strains from vineyards in the Vinho Verde region of Portugal. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 51: 167-177.
29. Sláviková E, Vadkertiová R & Vránová D (2007) Yeasts colonizing the leaf surfaces. J Basic Microb 47: 344-350.
30. (1999) Soil Taxonomy: a Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys, 2nd edn. USDA, Agriculture Handbook. Natural Resources Conservation Service No 436. Soil Survey Staff, Pittsburgh, PA. pp. 163-260.
31. Valero E, Schuller D, Cambon B, Casal M & Dequin S (2005) Dissemination and survival of comercial wine yeast in the vineyard: a large scale, three-year study. FEMS Yeast Res 5: 959-969.
32. Valero E, Cambon B, Schuller D, Casal M & Dequin S (2007) Biodiversity of Saccharomyces yeast strains from grape berries of wine-producing areas using starter commercial yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res 7: 317-329.
33. Vaudano E & Garcia-Moruno E (2008) Discrimination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains using microsatellite multiplex PCR and band pattern analysis. Food Microbiol 25: 56-64.
34. Verstrepen KJ, Chambers PJ & Pretorius IS (2006) The development of superior yeast strains for the food and beverage industries: challenges, opportunities and potential benefits. Yeasts in Food and Beverages (Querol A & Fleet GH, eds), pp. 399-444. Springer, Berlin.