Prism adaptation differently affects motor-intentional and perceptual-attentional biases in healthy individuals

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 2718-2727

  Fortis, Paola ^a,b,c   Goedert, Kelly M ^g   Barrett, Anna M ^c,d,e,f  

^a ISTITUTO AUXOLOGICO ITALIANO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^c KESSLER FOUNDATION   (United States)

^d RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e UMDNJ NJMS   (United States)

^f KESSLER INSTITUTE FOR REHABILITATION   (United States)

^g SETON HALL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Line bisection; Motor; Prism adaptation; Spatial neglect; Visuomotor adaptation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINE BISECTION; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRISM ADAPTATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; LENSES; MALE; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REFERENCE VALUES; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960167059     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.020     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. Adair J.C., Na D.L., Schwartz R.L., Heilman K.M. Analysis of primary and secondary influences on spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition 1998, 37:351-367.
2. Angeli V., Benassi M.G., Ladavas E. Recovery of oculo-motor bias in neglect patients after prism adaptation. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1223-1234.
3. Barrett A.M., Beversdorf D.Q., Crucian G.P., Heilman K.M. Neglect after right hemisphere stroke: A smaller floodlight for distributed attention. Neurology 1998, 51:972-978.
4. Barrett A.M., Burkholder S. Monocular patching in subjects with right-hemisphere stroke affects perceptual-attentional bias. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 2006, 43:337-346.
5. Barrett A.M., Buxbaum L.J., Coslett H.B., Edwards E., Heilman K.M., Hillis A.E., et al. Cognitive rehabilitation interventions for neglect and related disorders: moving from bench to bedside in stroke patients. J Cogn Neurosci 2006, 18:1223-1236.
6. Barrett A.M., Crosson J.B., Crucian G.P., Heilman K.M. Far bias on the radial line bisection task: Measuring perceptual-attentional and motor-intentional bias in normal subjects. Cortex 2002, 38:769-778.
7. Barrett A.M., Crucian G.P., Beversdorf D.Q., Heilman K.M. Monocular patching may worsen sensory-attentional neglect: A case report. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001, 82:516-518.
8. Barrett A.M., Crucian G.P., Schwartz R.L., Heilman K.M. Adverse effect of dopamine agonist therapy in a patient with motor-intentional neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1999, 80:600-603.
9. Berberovic N., Mattingley J.B. Effects of prismatic adaptation on judgements of spatial extent in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:493-503.
10. Berberovic N., Pisella L., Morris A.P., Mattingley J.B. Prismatic adaptation reduces biased temporal order judgements in spatial neglect. Neuroreport 2004, 15:1199-1204.
11. Bowers D., Heilman K.M. Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 1980, 18:491-498.
12. Bultitude J.H., Rafal R.D., List A. Prism adaptation reverses the local processing bias in patients with right temporo-parietal junction lesions. Brain 2009, 132:1669-1677.
13. Bultitude J.H., Woods J.M. Adaptation to leftward-shifting prisms reduces the global processing bias of healthy individuals. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:1750-1756.
14. Chen P., Erdahl L., Barrett A.M. Monocular patching may induce ipsilateral "where" spatial bias. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:711-716.
15. Chokron S. Right parietal lesions, unilateral spatial neglect, and the egocentric frame of reference. Neuroimage 2003, 20(Suppl. 1):S75-81.
16. Chokron S., Dupierrix E., Tabert M., Bartolomeo P. Experimental remission of unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:3127-3148.
17. Colent C., Pisella L., Bernieri C., Rode G., Rossetti Y. Cognitive bias induced by visuo-motor adaptation to prisms: A simulation of unilateral neglect in normal individuals?. Neuroreport 2000, 11:1899-1902.
18. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:201-215.
19. Coslett H.B., Bowers D., Fitzpatrick E., Haws B., Heilman K.M. Directional hypokinesia and hemispatial inattention in neglect. Brain 1990, 113(Pt 2):475-486.
20. Danckert J., Ferber S. Revisiting unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:987-1006.
21. De Renzi E., Colombo A., Faglioni P., Gibertoni M. Conjugate gaze paresis in stroke patients with unilateral damage. An unexpected instance of hemispheric asymmetry. Archives of Neurology 1982, 39:482-486.
22. Denes G., Semenza C., Stoppa E., Lis A. Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia: A follow-up study. Brain 1982, 105(Pt 3):543-552.
23. Dijkerman H.C., McIntosh R.D., Milner A.D., Rossetti Y., Tilikete C., Roberts R.C. Ocular scanning and perceptual size distortion in hemispatial neglect: Effects of prism adaptation and sequential stimulus presentation. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 153:220-230.
24. Driver J., Mattingley J.B. Parietal neglect and visual awareness. Nature Neuroscience 1998, 1:17-22.
25. Ferber S., Danckert J., Joanisse M., Goltz H.C., Goodale M.A. Eye movements tell only half the story. Neurology 2003, 60:1826-1829.
26. Ferber S., Murray L.J. Are perceptual judgments dissociated from motor processes? A prism adaptation study. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 23:453-456.
27. Fernandez-Ruiz J., Diaz R. Prism adaptation and aftereffect: Specifying the properties of a procedural memory system. Learning and Memory 1999, 6:47-53.
28. Fernandez-Ruiz J., Diaz R., Hall-Haro C., Vergara P., Mischner J., Nunez L., et al. Normal prism adaptation but reduced after-effect in basal ganglia disorders using a throwing task. The European Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 18:689-694.
29. Fernandez-Ruiz J., Hall C., Vergara P., Diiaz R. Prism adaptation in normal aging: Slower adaptation rate and larger aftereffect. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 2000, 9:223-226.
30. Fortis, P., Chen, P., Goedert, K. M., & Barrett, A. M. Prism adaptation selectively improves motor-intentional spatial bias in neglect patients. Submitted for publication.
31. Fortis P., Kornitzer J., Goedert K.M., Barrett A.M. Effect of prism adaptation on "aiming" spatial bias and functional abilities. Neurology 2009, 72:A332.
32. Fortis P., Maravita A., Gallucci M., Ronchi R., Grassi E., Senna I., et al. Rehabilitating patients with left spatial neglect by prism exposure during a visuomotor activity. Neuropsychology 2010, 24:681-697.
33. Frassinetti F., Angeli V., Meneghello F., Avanzi S., Ladavas E. Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation. Brain 2002, 125:608-623.
34. Garza J.P., Eslinger P.J., Barrett A.M. Perceptual-attentional and motor-intentional bias in near and far space. Brain and Cognition 2008, 68:9-14.
35. Goedert K.M., Leblanc A., Tsai S.W., Barrett A.M. Asymmetrical effects of adaptation to left- and right-shifting prisms depends on pre-existing attentional biases. Journal of International Neuropsychological Society 2010, 1-10.
36. Halligan P.W., Fink G.R., Marshall J.C., Vallar G. Spatial cognition: Evidence from visual neglect. Trends in Cognitive Science 2003, 7:125-133.
37. Heilman K.M. Intentional neglect. Frontiers in Bioscience 2004, 9:694-705.
38. Heilman K.M., Watson R.T., Valenstein E. Neglect and related disorders. Clinical neuropsychology 1979, 296-346. Oxford University Press, New York. K.M. Heilman, E. Valenstein (Eds.).
39. Humphreys G.W., Watelet A., Riddoch M.J. Long-term effects of prism adaptation in chronic visual neglect: A single case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2006, 23:463-478.
40. Jacquin-Courtois S., Rode G., Pavani F., O'Shea J., Giard M.H., Boisson D., et al. Effect of prism adaptation on left dichotic listening deficit in neglect patients: Glasses to hear better?. Brain 2010, 133:895-908.
41. Jacquin-Courtois S., Rode G., Pisella L., Boisson D., Rossetti Y. Wheel-chair driving improvement following visuo-manual prism adaptation. Cortex 2008, 44:90-96.
42. Jewell G., McCourt M.E. Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:93-110.
43. Karnath H.O., Ferber S., Himmelbach M. Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature 2001, 411(6840):950-953.
44. Katz N., Hartman-Maeir A., Ring H., Soroker N. Functional disability and rehabilitation outcome in right hemisphere damaged patients with and without unilateral spatial neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabiliation 1999, 80:379-384.
45. Keane S., Turner C., Sherrington C., Beard J.R. Use of fresnel prism glasses to treat stroke patients with hemispatial neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabiliation 2006, 87:1668-1672.
46. Keppel G., Wickens T.D. Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook 2004, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 4th ed.
47. Kerkhoff G. Spatial hemineglect in humans. Progress in Neurobiology 2001, 63:1-27.
48. Kornheiser A.S. Adaptation to laterally displaced vision: A review. Psychological Bulletin 1976, 83:783-816.
49. Ladavas E., Bonifazi S., Catena L., Serino A. Neglect rehabilitation by prism adaptation: Different procedures have different impacts. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49(5):1136-1145.
50. Loftus A.M., Nicholls M.E., Mattingley J.B., Bradshaw J.L. Left to right: Representational biases for numbers and the effect of visuomotor adaptation. Cognition 2008, 107:1048-1058.
51. Loftus A.M., Vijayakumar N., Nicholls M.E. Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task. Cortex 2009, 45:537-543.
52. Longo M.R., Lourenco S.F. Spatial attention and the mental number line: Evidence for characteristic biases and compression. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:1400-1407.
53. Luaute J., Halligan P., Rode G., Jacquin-Courtois S., Boisson D. Prism adaptation first among equals in alleviating left neglect: A review. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2006, 24:409-418.
54. Lünenburger L., Kleiser R., Stuphorn V., Miller L.E., Hoffmann K.P. A possible role of the superior colliculus in eye-hand coordination. Progress in Brain Research 2001, 134:109-125.
55. Mapstone M., Weintraub S., Nowinski C., Kaptanoglu G., Gitelman D.R., Mesulam M.M. Cerebral hemispheric specialization for spatial attention: Spatial distribution of search-related eye fixations in the absence of neglect. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:1396-1409.
56. Maravita A., McNeil J., Malhotra P., Greenwood R., Husain M., Driver J. Prism adaptation can improve contralesional tactile perception in neglect. Neurology 2003, 60:1829-1831.
57. Mark V.W., Heilman K.M. Bodily neglect and orientational biases in unilateral neglect syndrome and normal subjects. Neurology 1990, 40:640-643.
58. Martin T.A., Keating J.G., Goodkin H.P., Bastian A.J., Thach W.T. Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation. Brain 1996, 119(Pt 4):1183-1198.
59. Martin T.A., Keating J.G., Goodkin H.P., Bastian A.J., Thach W.T. Throwing while looking through prisms. II. Specificity and storage of multiple gaze-throw calibrations. Brain 1996, 119(Pt 4):1199-1211.
60. McCourt M.E. Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39:1065-1076.
61. McCourt M.E., Jewell G. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:843-855.
62. McGeorge P., Beschin N., Colnaghi A., Rusconi M.L., Della Sala S. A lateralized bias in mental imagery: Evidence for representational pseudoneglect. Neuroscience Letters 2007, 421:259-263.
63. Michel C., Rossetti Y., Rode G., Tilikete C. After-effects of visuo-manual adaptation to prisms on body posture in normal subjects. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 148:219-226.
64. Michel C., Vernet P., Courtine G., Ballay Y., Pozzo T. Asymmetrical after-effects of prism adaptation during goal oriented locomotion. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 185:259-268.
65. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 2006, Oxford University Press, New York, (Chapter).
66. Morris A.P., Kritikos A., Berberovic N., Pisella L., Chambers C.D., Mattingley J.B. Prism adaptation and spatial attention: A study of visual search in normals and patients with unilateral neglect. Cortex 2004, 40:703-721.
67. Mort D.J., Malhotra P., Mannan S.K., Rorden C., Pambakian A., Kennard C., et al. The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain 2003, 126(Pt 9):1986-1997.
68. Morton S.M., Bastian A.J. Prism adaptation during walking generalizes to reaching and requires the cerebellum. Journal of Neurophysiology 2004, 92:2497-2509.
69. Na D.L., Adair J.C., Williamson D.J., Schwartz R.L., Haws B., Heilman K.M. Dissociation of sensory-attentional from motor-intentional neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1998, 64:331-338.
70. Nicholls M.E., Bradshaw J.L., Mattingley J.B. Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:307-314.
71. Nicholls M.E., Loftus A.M. Pseudoneglect and neglect for mental alphabet lines. Brain Research 2007, 1152:130-138.
72. Nico D. Detecting directional hypokinesia: The epidiascope technique. Neuropsychologia 1996, 34:471-474.
73. Nijboer T.C., McIntosh R.D., Nys G.M., Dijkerman H.C., Milner A.D. Prism adaptation improves voluntary but not automatic orienting in neglect. Neuroreport 2008, 19:293-298.
74. Nijboer T.C., Nys G.M., van der Smagt M.J., van der Stigchel S., Dijkerman H.C. Repetitive long-term prism adaptation permanently improves the detection of contralesional visual stimuli in a patient with chronic neglect. Cortex 2010, 47(6):734-740.
75. Ogourtsova T., Korner-Bitensky N., Ptito A. Contribution of the superior colliculi to post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect and recovery. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(9):2407-2416.
76. Paolucci S., Antonucci G., Grasso M.G., Pizzamiglio L. The role of unilateral spatial neglect in rehabilitation of right brain-damaged ischemic stroke patients: A matched comparison. Archives Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001, 82:743-749.
77. Pisella L., Rode G., Farne A., Tilikete C., Rossetti Y. Prism adaptation in the rehabilitation of patients with visuo-spatial cognitive disorders. Current Opinion in Neurology 2006, 19:534-542.
78. Rapcsak S.Z., Verfaellie M., Fleet W.S., Heilman K.M. Selective attention in hemispatial neglect. Archives of Neurology 1989, 46:178-182.
79. Redding G.M., Rossetti Y., Wallace B. Applications of prism adaptation: A tutorial in theory and method. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2005, 29:431-444.
80. Redding G.M., Wallace B. Effects on prism adaptation of duration and timing of visual feedback during pointing. Journal of Motor Behavior 1990, 22:209-224.
81. Redding G.M., Wallace B. Prism adaptation during target pointing from visible and nonvisible starting locations. Journal of Motor Behavior 1997, 29:119-130.
82. Redding G.M., Wallace B. Prism adaptation and unilateral neglect: Review and analysis. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:1-20.
83. Redding G.M., Wallace B. Implications of prism adaptation asymmetry for unilateral visual neglect: Theoretical note. Cortex 2010, 46:390-396.
84. Ringman J.M., Saver J.L., Woolson R.F., Adams H.P. Hemispheric asymmetry of gaze deviation and relationship to neglect in acute stroke. Neurology 2005, 65:1661-1662.
85. Ringman J.M., Saver J.L., Woolson R.F., Clarke W.R., Adams H.P. Frequency, risk factors, anatomy, and course of unilateral neglect in an acute stroke cohort. Neurology 2004, 63:468-474.
86. Rode G., Klos T., Courtois-Jacquin S., Rossetti Y., Pisella L. Neglect and prism adaptation: A new therapeutic tool for spatial cognition disorders. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2006, 24:347-356.
87. Rode G., Rossetti Y., Boisson D. Prism adaptation improves representational neglect. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39:1250-1254.
88. Rossetti Y., Jacquin-Courtois S., Rode G., Ota H., Michel C., Boisson D. Does action make the link between number and space representation? Visuo-manual adaptation improves number bisection in unilateral neglect. Psychological Science 2004, 15:426-430.
89. Rossetti Y., Rode G., Pisella L., Farne A., Li L., Boisson D., et al. Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature 1998, 395:166-169.
90. Rousseaux M., Bernati T., Saj A., Kozlowski O. Ineffectiveness of prism adaptation on spatial neglect signs. Stroke 2006, 37:542-543.
91. Saevarsson S., Kristjansson A., Hildebrandt H., Halsband U. Prism adaptation improves visual search in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:717-725.
92. Sarri M., Greenwood R., Kalra L., Driver J. Prism adaptation does not change the rightward spatial preference bias found with ambiguous stimuli in unilateral neglect. Cortex 2010, 47(3):353-366.
93. Sarri M., Greenwood R., Kalra L., Papps B., Husain M., Driver J. Prism adaptation aftereffects in stroke patients with spatial neglect: Pathological effects on subjective straight ahead but not visual open-loop pointing. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1069-1080.
94. Sarri M., Kalra L., Greenwood R., Driver J. Prism adaptation changes perceptual awareness for chimeric visual objects but not for chimeric faces in spatial neglect after right-hemisphere stroke. Neurocase 2006, 12:127-135.
95. Schwartz R.L., Adair J.C., Na D., Williamson D.J., Heilman K.M. Spatial bias: Attentional and intentional influence in normal subjects. Neurology 1997, 48:234-242.
96. Serino A., Angeli V., Frassinetti F., Ladavas E. Mechanisms underlying neglect recovery after prism adaptation. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:1068-1078.
97. Serino A., Barbiani M., Rinaldesi M.L., Ladavas E. Effectiveness of prism adaptation in neglect rehabilitation: A controlled trial study. Stroke 2009, 40:1392-1398.
98. Serino A., Bonifazi S., Pierfederici L., Ladavas E. Neglect treatment by prism adaptation: What recovers and for how long. Neuropsychological Rehabilitations 2007, 17:657-687.
99. Shiraishi H., Yamakawa Y., Itou A., Muraki T., Asada T. Long-term effects of prism adaptation on chronic neglect after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation 2008, 23:137-151.
100. Stratton G.M. Some preliminary experiments on vision without inversion of the retinal image. Psychological Review 1896, 3:611-617.
101. Striemer C., Danckert J. Prism adaptation reduces the disengage deficit in right brain damage patients. Neuroreport 2007, 18:99-103.
102. Striemer C., Sablatnig J., Danckert J. Differential influences of prism adaptation on reflexive and voluntary covert attention. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2006, 12:337-349.
103. Striemer C.L., Danckert J. Dissociating perceptual and motor effects of prism adaptation in neglect. Neuroreport 2010, 21(6):436-441.
104. Striemer C.L., Danckert J.A. Through a prism darkly: Re-evaluating prisms and neglect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2010, 14:308-316.
105. Tegner R., Levander M. Through a looking glass. A new technique to demonstrate directional hypokinesia in unilateral neglect. Brain 1991, 114(Pt 4):1943-1951.
106. Tilikete C., Rode G., Rossetti Y., Pichon J., Li L., Boisson D. Prism adaptation to rightward optical deviation improves postural imbalance in left-hemiparetic patients. Current Biology 2001, 11:524-528.
107. Vallar G. Spatial hemineglect in humans. Trends in Cognitive Science 1998, 2:87-97.
108. Vangkilde S., Habekost T. Finding Wally: Prism adaptation improves visual search in chronic neglect. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:1994-2004.