Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 307-314

  Nicholls, Michael E R ^a   Bradshaw, John L ^b   Mattingley, Jason B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Attention; Chimeric; Left hemisphere; Line bisection; Right hemisphere

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0032911362     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00074-8     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bradshaw JL, Nathan G, Nettleton NC, Wilson LE, Pierson JM. Why is there a left side underestimation in rod bisection? Neuropsychologia 1987;24:735-38.
2. Brodie EE, Pettigrew LEL. Is left always right? Directional deviations in visual line bisection as a function of hand and initial scanning direction. Neuropsychologia 1996;34:467-70.
3. Cohen-Levine S, Banich MT, Primeau M. Face recognition: a general or specific right hemisphere capacity? Brain and Cognition 1988;8:303-25.
4. Davidoff JB. Hemispheric differences in the perception of lightness. Neuropsychologia 1975;13:121-4.
5. Fischer MH. Less attention and more perception in cued line bisection. Brain and Cognition 1994;25:24-33.
6. Fontenot DJ. Visual field differences in the recognition of verbal and non-verbal stimuli in man. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1973;85:564-9.
7. Friedman A, Campbell M. Hemispheres as independent resource systems: Limited-capacity processing and cerebral specialization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1981;7:1031-58.
8. Heilman KM, Valenstein E. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology 1979;5:166-70.
9. Hoptman MJ, Levy J. Perceptual asymmetries in left- and right-handers for cartoons and real faces. Brain and Cognition 1988;8:178-88.
10. Kinsbourne M. The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologia 1970;33:193-201.
11. Levy J, Heller W, Banich M, Burton LA. Are variations in right-handed individuals in perceptual asymmetries caused by characteristic arousal differences between the hemispheres?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1983;9:329-59.
12. Luh KE. Line bisection and perceptual asymmetries in normal individuals: what you see is not what you get. Neuropsychology 1995;9:435-48.
13. Luh KE, Rueckert LM, Levy J. Perceptual asymmetries for free viewing of several types of chimeric stimuli. Brain and Cognition 1991;16:83-103.
14. Manning L, Halligan PW, Marshall JC. Individual variation in line bisection: a study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect. Neuropsychologia 1990;28:647-55.
15. Mattingley JB, Bradshaw JL, Bradshaw JA, Nettleton NC. Residual rightward attentional bias after apparent recovery from right-hemisphere damage: implications for a multicomponent model of neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1994;57:597-604.
16. Mattingley JB, Bradshaw JL, Nettleton NC, Bradshaw JA. Can task specific perceptual bias be distinguished from unilateral neglect?. Neuropsychologia 1994;32:805-17.
17. Mattingley JB, Pierson JM, Bradshaw JL, Phillips JG, Bradshaw JA. To see or not to see: the effects of visible and invisible cues on line bisection judgements in unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 1993;31:1201-15.
18. McCourt ME, Olafson C. Cognitive and perceptual influences in visual line bisection: psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 1997;35:369-80.
19. McGlone J, Davidson W. The relation between cerebral speech laterality and spatial ability with special reference to sex and hand preference. Neuropsychologia 1973;11:105-13.
20. Milner AD, Brechmann M, Pagliarini L. To halve or to halve not: an analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 1992;30:515-26.
21. Moreno CR, Borod JC, Welkowitz J, Alpert M. Lateralisation for the expression and perception of facial emotion as a function of age. Neuropsychologia 1990;28:199-209.
22. Nichelli P, Rinaldi M, Cubelli R. Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition 1989;9:57-70.
23. Nicholls MER, Clode D. A failure to produce a left hemisphere advantage through verbal priming. Neuropsychologia 1996;43:893-904.
24. Oldfield RC. The assessment of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97-133.
25. Palmer T, Tzeng OJL. Cerebral asymmetry in visual attention. Brain and Cognition 1990;13:46-58.
26. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Davidson RJ. Differential contribution of the two hemispheres to the perception of happy and sad faces. Neuropsychologia 1981;19:609-13.
27. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Posner MI. Components of neglect from right hemisphere damage: an analysis of line bisection. Neuropsychologia 1990;28:327-33.
28. Sakhuja T, Gupta GC, Singh M, Vaid J. Reading habits affect asymmetries in facial affect judgements: a replication. Brain and Cognition 1996;32:162-65.
29. Sampaio E, Chokron S. Pseudoneglect and reversed pseudoneglect among left-handers and right-handers. Neuropsychologia 1992;30:797-805.
30. Schiff BB, Truchon C. Effect of unilateral contraction of hand muscles on perceiver biases in the perception of chimeric and neutral faces. Neuropsychologia 1993;31:1351-65.
31. Werth R, Poeppel E. Compression and lateral shift of mental coordinate systems in a line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 1988;26:741-45.
32. Wirsen A, Klinteberg BA, Levander S, Schalling D. Differences in asymmetric perception of facial expression in free-vision chimeric stimuli and reaction time. Brain and Cognition 1990;12:229-39.