Through a prism darkly: Re-evaluating prisms and neglect

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 14, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 308-316

  Striemer, Christopher L ^a   Danckert, James A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENEFICIAL EFFECTS; BRAIN CIRCUITS; HIGHER ORDER; PRISM ADAPTATION; SPATIAL ATTENTION; VISUOMOTORS;

SILICON SOLAR CELLS;

PRISMS;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MESENCEPHALON; PARIETAL LOBE; PRISM; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL DEPRIVATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; BRAIN; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; OPTICS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ATTENTION; BRAIN; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; OPTICS AND PHOTONICS; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 77954033827     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Husain M., Rorden C. Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in hemispatial neglect. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2003, 4:26-36.
2. Danckert J., Ferber S. Revisiting unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:987-1006.
3. Bartolomeo P., Chokron S. Orienting of attention in left unilateral neglect. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2002, 26:217-234.
4. Karnath H.O., et al. Space exploration in neglect. Brain 1998, 121(12):2357-2367.
5. Danckert J., et al. Neglected time: impaired temporal perception of multisecond intervals in unilateral neglect. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2007, 19:1706-1720.
6. Ferber S., Danckert J. Lost in space - the fate of memory representations for non-neglected stimuli. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:320-325.
7. Husain M., et al. Impaired spatial working memory across saccades contributes to abnormal search in parietal neglect. Brain 2001, 124:941-952.
8. Husain M., et al. Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients. Nature 1997, 385:154-156.
9. Robertson I.H., Halligan P.W. Spatial neglect: A clinical handbook for diagnosis and treatment 1999, Psychology Press Ltd.
10. Redding G.M., Wallace B. Prism adaptation and unilateral neglect: review and analysis. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:1-20.
11. Rossetti Y., et al. Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature 1998, 395:166-169.
12. Tilikete C., et al. Prism adaptation to rightward optical deviation improves postural imbalance in left-hemiparetic patients. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11:524-528.
13. Rode G., et al. Prism adaptation improves representational neglect. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39:1250-1254.
14. Maravita A., et al. Prism adaptation can improve contralesional tactile perception in neglect. Neurology 2003, 60:1829-1831.
15. Farné A., et al. Ameliorating neglect with prism adaptation: visuo-manual and visuo-verbal measures. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:718-729.
16. Dijkerman H.C., et al. Ocular scanning and perceptual size distortion in hemispatial neglect: effects of prism adaptation and sequential stimulus presentation. Exp. Brain Res. 2003, 153:220-230.
17. Angeli V., et al. Recovery of oculo-motor bias in neglect patients after prism adaptation. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1223-1234.
18. Serino A., et al. Mechanisms underlying neglect recovery after prism adaptation. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:1068-1078.
19. Ferber S., et al. Eye movements tell only half the story. Neurology 2003, 60:1826-1829.
20. Schindler I., et al. The disengage deficit in hemispatial neglect is restricted to between-object shifts and is abolished by prism adaptation. Exp. Brain Res. 2009, 192:499-510.
21. Berberovic N., et al. Prismatic adaptation reduces biased temporal order judgements in spatial neglect. Neuroreport 2004, 15:1199-1204.
22. Nijboer T.C., et al. Prism adaptation improves voluntary but not automatic orienting in neglect. Neuroreport 2008, 19:293-298.
23. Striemer C., Danckert J. Prism adaptation reduces the disengage deficit in right brain damage patients. Neuroreport 2007, 18:99-103.
24. Jacquin-Courtois S., et al. Wheel-chair driving improvement following visuo-manual prism adaptation. Cortex 2008, 44:90-96.
25. Colent C., et al. Cognitive bias induced by visuo-motor adaptation to prisms: a simulation of unilateral neglect in normal individuals?. Neuroreport 2000, 11:1899-1902.
26. Girardi M., et al. Sensorimotor effects on central space representation: prism adaptation influences haptic and visual representations in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1477-1487.
27. Michel C. Simulating unilateral neglect in normals: Myth or reality?. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2006, 24:419-430.
28. Michel C., et al. Simulating unilateral neglect in normals using prism adaptation: implications for theory. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:25-39.
29. Michel C., et al. After-effects of visuo-manual adaptation to prisms on body posture in normal subjects. Exp. Brain Res. 2003, 148:219-226.
30. Pisella L., et al. Prism adaptation in the rehabilitation of patients with visuo-spatial cognitive disorders. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2006, 19:534-542.
31. Nys G.M., et al. Acute neglect rehabilitation using repetitive prism adaptation: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2008, 26:1-12.
32. Turton A.J., et al. A single blinded randomised controlled pilot trial of prism adaptation for improving self-care in stroke patients with neglect. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 2009, 20:180-196.
33. Sarri M., et al. Prism adaptation aftereffects in stroke patients with spatial neglect: Pathological effects on subjective straight ahead but not visual open-loop pointing. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1069-1080.
34. Bultitude J.H., et al. Prism adaptation reverses the local processing bias in patients with right temporo-parietal junction lesions. Brain 2009, 132:1669-1677.
35. Robertson L.C., et al. Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans. J. Neurosci. 1988, 8:3757-3769.
36. Morris A.P., et al. Prism adaptation and spatial attention: a study of visual search in normals and patients with unilateral neglect. Cortex 2004, 40:703-721.
37. Striemer C.L., Danckert J. Dissociating perceptual and motor effects of prism adaptation in spatial neglect. Neuroreport 2010, 21:436-441.
38. Milner A.D., et al. Line bisection errors in visual neglect: misguided action or size distortion?. Neuropsychologia 1993, 31:39-49.
39. Saevarsson S., et al. Prism adaptation improves visual search in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:717-725.
40. Wolfe J.M., Horowitz T.S. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 5:495-501.
41. Loftus A.M., et al. Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task. Cortex 2009, 45:537-543.
42. Sarri M., et al. Prism adaptation changes perceptual awareness for chimeric visual objects but not for chimeric faces in spatial neglect after right-hemisphere stroke. Neurocase 2006, 12:127-135.
43. Rossetti Y., et al. Does Action Make the Link Between Number and Space Representation?. Psychol. Sci. 2004, 15:426-430.
44. Servos P., Goodale M.A. Preserved visual imagery in visual form agnosia. Neuropsychologia 1995, 33:1383-1394.
45. Laeng B., Teodorescu D.S. Eye scanpaths during visual imagery reenact those of perception of the same visual scene. Cogn. Sci. 2002, 26:207-231.
46. Clower D.M., et al. Role of posterior parietal cortex in the recalibration of visually guided reaching. Nature 1996, 383:618-621.
47. Danckert J., et al. Direct effects of prismatic lenses on visuomotor control: an event-related functional MRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:1696-1704.
48. Clower D.M., et al. Basal ganglia and cerebellar inputs to 'AIP'. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:913-920.
49. Luaute J., et al. Dynamic changes in brain activity during prism adaptation. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:169-178.
50. Luaute J., et al. Functional anatomy of the therapeutic effects of prism adaptation on left neglect. Neurology 2006, 66:1859-1867.
51. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 2006, Oxford University Press.
52. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:201-215.
53. Coulthard E., et al. Action control in visual neglect. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:2717-2733.
54. Karnath H.O., et al. Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature 2001, 411:950-953.
55. Mort D.J., et al. The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain 2003, 126:1986-1997.
56. Shiraishi H., et al. Long-term effects of prism adaptation on chronic neglect after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation 2008, 23:137-151.
57. Striemer C., et al. Bilateral parietal lesions disrupt the beneficial effects of prism adaptation: evidence from a patient with optic ataxia. Exp. Brain Res. 2008, 187:295-302.
58. Corbetta M., et al. Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:1603-1610.
59. Baizer J.S., et al. Cerebellar lesions and prism adaptation in macaque monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 1999, 81:1960-1965.
60. Pisella L., et al. Ipsidirectional impairment of prism adaptation after unilateral lesion of anterior cerebellum. Neurology 2005, 65:150-152.
61. Dum R.P., Strick P.L. An unfolded map of the cerebellar dentate nucleus and its projections to the cerebral cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2003, 89:634-639.
62. Husain M., Nachev P. Space and the parietal cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11:30-36.
63. Newport R., Jackson S.R. Posterior parietal cortex and the dissociable components of prism adaptation. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:2757-2765.
64. Driver J., Mattingley J.B. Parietal neglect and visual awareness. Nat. Neurosci. 1998, 1:17-22.
65. Mattingley J.B., et al. Can task specific perceptual bias be distinguished from unilateral neglect?. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32:805-817.
66. Sarri, M. et al. Prism adaptation does not change the rightward spatial preference bias found with ambiguous stimuli in unilateral neglect. Cortex. (in press).
67. Pisella L., et al. Dissociated long lasting improvements of straight-ahead pointing and line bisection tasks in two hemineglect patients. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:327-334.
68. Frassinetti F., et al. Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation. Brain 2002, 125:608-623.
69. McIntosh R.D., et al. Prism adaptation improves chronic visual and haptic neglect: a single case study. Cortex 2002, 38:309-320.
70. Dijkerman H.C., et al. A long-lasting improvement of somatosensory function after prism adaptation, a case study. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1697-1702.
71. Rousseaux M., et al. Ineffectiveness of prism adaptation on spatial neglect signs. Stroke 2006, 37:542-543.
72. Rode G., et al. Prism adaptation improves spatial dysgraphia following right brain damage. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:2487-2493.
73. Vallar G., et al. Productive and defective impairments in the neglect syndrome: graphic perseveration, drawing productions and optic prism exposure. Cortex 2006, 42:911-920.
74. Keane S., et al. Use of fresnel prism glasses to treat stroke patients with hemispatial neglect. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2006, 87:1668-1672.
75. Humphreys G.W., et al. Long-term effects of prism adaptation in chronic visual neglect: A single case study. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 2006, 23:463-478.
76. Serino A., et al. Neglect treatment by prism adaptation: What recovers and for how long. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 2007, 17:657-687.
77. Nys G.M., et al. Prism adaptation moves neglect-related perseveration to contralesional space. Cogn. Behav. Neurol. 2008, 21:249-253.
78. Serino A., et al. Effectiveness of prism adaptation in neglect rehabilitation: a controlled trial study. Stroke 2009, 40:1392-1398.