Development of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 573-589

  Brummel, Bradley J ^a   Gunsalus, C K ^b   Anderson, Kerri L ^c   Loui, Michael C ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TULSA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^d University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Graduate students; Responsible conduct of research; Role play

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; EDUCATION; ENGINEERING; ETHICS; EVALUATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; METHODOLOGY; RESEARCH; ROLE PLAYING; SCIENCE;

EDUCATION, GRADUATE; ENGINEERING; ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; RESEARCH; ROLE PLAYING; SCIENCE;

EID: 77955558586     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 16605454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-010-9221-7     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barkley, E. F. (2010). Student engagement techniques. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Bebeau, M. J., Pimple, K. D., Muskavitch, K. M. T., Borden, S. L., Smith, D. H., & Agnew, E. (1995). Moral reasoning in scientific research: Cases for teaching and assessment. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University. http://poynter. indiana. edu/mr/mr. pdf.
3. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, D. C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
4. Bragger, J. D., & Freeman, M. A. (1999). Using a cost-benefit analysis to teach ethics and statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 26(1), 34-36.
5. Braunschweiger, P., & Goodman, K. W. (2007). The CITI program: An international online resource for education in human subjects protection and the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82, 861-864.
6. Brislin, T. (1995). Active learning in applied ethics instruction. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 6(3), 161-167.
7. Brown, K. M. (1994). Using role plays to integrate ethics into the business curriculum: A financial management example. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(2), 105-110.
8. Brown, S., & Kalichman, M. W. (1998). Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: A survey of graduate students in experimental sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4(4), 487-498.
9. Cooley, W. L., Klinkhachorn, P., McConnell, R. L., & Middleton, N. T. (1991). Developing professionalism in the electrical-engineering classroom. IEEE Transactions on Education, 34(2), 149-154.
10. Didier, C. (2000). Engineering ethics at the Catholic University of Lille (France): Research and teaching in a European context. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), 325-335.
11. Doron, I. (2007). Court of ethics: Teaching ethics and aging by means of role playing. Educational Gerontology, 33(9), 737-758.
12. Fischer, B. A., & Zigmond, M. J. (2001). Promoting responsible conduct of research through "survival skills" workshops: Some mentoring is best done in a crowd. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(4), 563-587.
13. Frechtling, J. (2002). The 2002 user friendly handbook for project evaluation. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
14. Funk, C. L., Barrett, K. A., & Macrina, F. L. (2007). Authorship and publication practices: Evaluation of the effect of responsible conduct of research instruction to postdoctoral trainees. Accountability in Research, 14, 269-305.
15. Garvin, W., & Stefani, L. A. J. (1993). Genethics-genetic disorder and diagnosis: A role-play exercise. Journal of Biological Education, 27(1), 51-57.
16. Gunsalus, C. K. (1998). How to blow the whistle and still have a career afterwards. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4(1), 51-64.
17. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
18. Herkert, J. R. (1997). Collaborative learning in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3(4), 447-462.
19. Jarvis, P. (1987). Adult learning in the social context. London: Croom Helm.
20. Jensen, G. M., & Richert, A. E. (2005). Reflection on the teaching of ethics in physical therapist education: Integrating cases, theory, and learning. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 19(3), 78-85.
21. Johnson, W. B., & Corser, R. (1998). Learning ethics the hard way: Facing the ethics committee. Teaching of Psychology, 25(1), 26-28.
22. Juergens, A., & McCaffrey, A. (2008). Roleplays as rehearsals for "doing the right thing"-adding practice in professional values to Moldovan and United States legal education. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 28, 141-193. http://law. wustl. edu/Journal/28/JuergensMcCaffreybookpages. pdf.
23. Kligyte, V., Marcy, R. T., Sevier, S. T., Godfrey, E. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2008). A qualitative approach to responsible conduct of research (RCR) training development: Identification of metacognitive strategies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(1), 3-31.
24. Kraus, R. (2008). You must participate: Violating research ethical principles through role-play. College Teaching, 56(3), 131-136.
25. Martin, T., Rayne, K., Kemp, N. J., Hart, J., & Diller, K. R. (2005). Teaching for adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(2), 257-276.
26. McKeachie, W. J., & Svinicki, M. (2006). McKeachie's teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (12th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
27. Nelson, M. S., & Eliastam, M. (1991). Role-playing for teaching ethics in emergency medicine. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 9(4), 370-374.
28. Plemmons, D. K. & Kalichman, M. W. (May, 2009). Comparative effectiveness of research ethics teaching methods. In Presentation at the Fifth Biennial Office of Research Integrity Research Conference on Research Integrity, Niagara Falls, NY.
29. Plemmons, D. K., Brody, S. Z., & Kalichman, M. W. (2006). Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(3), 571-582.
30. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
31. Raisner, J. A. (1997). Using the "ethical environment" paradigm to teach business ethics: The case of the maquiladoras. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(12-13), 1331-1346.
32. Rosnow, R. L. (1990). Teaching research ethics through role-play and discussion. Teaching of Psychology, 17(3), 179-181.
33. Sanyal, R. N. (2000). An experiential approach to teaching ethics in international business. Teaching Business Ethics, 4(2), 137-149.
34. Silberman, M. (Ed.). (2007). The handbook of experiential learning. San Francisco: Wiley/Pfeiffer.
35. Sofaer, B. (1995). Enhancing humanistic skills: An experiential approach to learning about ethical issues in health care. Journal of Medical Ethics, 21(1), 31-34.
36. Strohmetz, D. B., & Skleder, A. A. (1992). The use of role-play in teaching research ethics: A validation study. Teaching of Psychology, 19(2), 106-108.
37. The Belmont Report (1979). Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Publication No. (OS) 78-0012.
38. Treisman, U. (1992). Studying students studying calculus: A look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college. College Mathematics Journal, 23(5), 362-372.
39. Whitbeck, C. (1995). Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: Moral agents and moral problems. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1(3), 299-308. http://www. springerlink. com/content/m6553751q33g04wq/.
40. Whitbeck, C. (1996). Ethics as design: Doing justice to moral problems. The Hastings Center Report, 26 (3), 9-16. http://www. jstor. org/stable/3527925.