Internal organization of large protein families: Relationship between the sequence, structure, and function-based clustering

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 79, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 2389-2402

  Cai, Xiao Hui ^a   Jaroszewski, Lukasz ^b   Wooley, John ^a   Godzik, Adam ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b BURNHAM INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative modeling; Protein function prediction; Protein structure initiative; Protein structure prediction; Structural genomics

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL GENOMICS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PROTEINS;

EID: 79960106288     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.23049     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Knudsen M, Wiuf C. The CATH database. Hum Genomics 2010; 4: 207-212.
2. Vitkup D, Melamud E, Moult J, Sander C. Completeness in structural genomics. Nat Struct Biol 2001; 8: 559-566.
3. Mirkovic N, Li Z, Parnassa A, Murray D. Strategies for high-throughput comparative modeling: applications to leverage analysis in structural genomics and protein family organization. Proteins 2007; 66: 766-777.
4. Yooseph S, Sutton G, Rusch DB, Halpern AL, Williamson SJ, Remington K, Eisen JA, Heidelberg KB, Manning G, Li W, Jaroszewski L, Cieplak P, Miller CS, Li H, Mashiyama ST, Joachimiak MP, van Belle C, Chandonia JM, Soergel DA, Zhai Y, Natarajan K, Lee S, Raphael BJ, Bafna V, Friedman R, Brenner SE, Godzik A, Eisenberg D, Dixon JE, Taylor SS, Strausberg RL, Frazier M, Venter JC. The sorcerer II global ocean sampling expedition: expanding the universe of protein families. PLoS Biol 2007; 5: e16.
5. Burra PV, Zhang Y, Godzik A, Stec B. Global distribution of conformational states derived from redundant models in the PDB points to non-uniqueness of the protein structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 10505-10510.
6. Harrison PM, Gerstein M. Studying genomes through the aeons: protein families, pseudogenes and proteome evolution. J Mol Biol 2002; 318: 1155-1174.
7. Lee D, Grant A, Marsden RL, Orengo C. Identification and distribution of protein families in 120 completed genomes using Gene3D. Proteins 2005; 59: 603-615.
8. Schwarzenbacher R, Godzik A, Grzechnik SK, Jaroszewski L. The importance of alignment accuracy for molecular replacement. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2004; 60 (Pt 7): 1229-1236.
9. Dunbrack RL, Jr. Sequence comparison and protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006; 16: 374-384.
10. Wan XF, Xu D. Computational methods for remote homolog identification. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2005; 6: 527-546.
11. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215: 403-410.
12. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25: 3389-3402.
13. Rychlewski L, Jaroszewski L, Li W, Godzik A. Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci 2000; 9: 232-241.
14. Yona G, Levitt M. Within the twilight zone: a sensitive profile-profile comparison tool based on information theory. J Mol Biol 2002; 315: 1257-1275.
15. Panchenko AR. Finding weak similarities between proteins by sequence profile comparison. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31: 683-689.
16. von Ohsen N, Sommer I, Zimmer R. Profile-profile alignment: a powerful tool for protein structure prediction. Pac Symp Biocomput 2003: 252-263.
17. Sadreyev RI, Baker D, Grishin NV. Profile-profile comparisons by COMPASS predict intricate homologies between protein families. Protein Sci 2003; 12: 2262-2272.
18. Wallner B, Fang H, Ohlson T, Frey-Skott J, Elofsson A. Using evolutionary information for the query and target improves fold recognition. Proteins 2004; 54: 342-350.
19. Cuff AL, Sillitoe I, Lewis T, Redfern OC, Garratt R, Thornton J, Orengo CA. The CATH classification revisited-architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37 (Database issue): D310-D314.
20. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM. CATH-a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 1997; 5: 1093-1108.
21. Finn RD, Mistry J, Tate J, Coggill P, Heger A, Pollington JE, Gavin OL, Gunasekaran P, Ceric G, Forslund K, Holm L, Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Bateman A. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38 (Database issue): D211-D222.
22. Andreeva A, Howorth D, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJ, Chothia C, Murzin AG. Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36 (Database issue): D419-425.
23. Ye Y, Godzik A. Flexible structure alignment by chaining aligned fragment pairs allowing twists. Bioinformatics 2003; 19 ( Suppl 2): ii246-ii255.
24. Burley SK, Joachimiak A, Montelione GT, Wilson IA. Contributions to the NIH-NIGMS protein structure initiative from the PSI production centers. Structure 2008; 16: 5-11.
25. Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Birney E, Bateman A, Durbin R. Pfam: multiple sequence alignments and HMM-profiles of protein domains. Nucleic Acids Res 1998; 26: 320-322.
26. Yeats C, Lees J, Reid A, Kellam P, Martin N, Liu X, Orengo C. Gene3D: comprehensive structural and functional annotation of genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36 (Database issue): D414-D418.
27. Li W, Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 2006; 22: 1658-1659.
28. Ye Y, Godzik A. FATCAT: a web server for flexible structure comparison and structure similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32 (Web Server issue): W582-W585.
29. Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Godzik A. Improving the quality of twilight-zone alignments. Protein Sci 2000; 9: 1487-1496.
30. Krissinel E. On the relationship between sequence and structure similarities in proteomics. Bioinformatics 2007; 23: 717-723.
31. Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffin LJ, Buxton BF, Jones DT. Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J Mol Biol 2004; 337: 635-645.
32. Nair R, Liu J, Soong TT, Acton TB, Everett JK, Kouranov A, Fiser A, Godzik A, Jaroszewski L, Orengo C, Montelione GT, Rost B. Structural genomics is the largest contributor of novel structural leverage. J Struct Funct Genomics 2009; 10: 181-191.
33. Dessailly BH, Nair R, Jaroszewski L, Fajardo JE, Kouranov A, Lee D, Fiser A, Godzik A, Rost B, Orengo C. PSI-2: structural genomics to cover protein domain family space. Structure 2009; 17: 869-881.
34. Das R, Baker D. Macromolecular modeling with rosetta. Annu Rev Biochem 2008; 77: 363-382.
35. Eswar N, Eramian D, Webb B, Shen MY, Sali A. Protein structure modeling with MODELLER. Methods Mol Biol 2008; 426: 145-159.
36. Cooper S, Khatib F, Treuille A, Barbero J, Lee J, Beenen M, Leaver-Fay A, Baker D, Popovic Z, Players F. Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature 2010; 466: 756-760.