Lack of adaptation to random conflicting force fields of variable magnitude

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 738-745

  Gupta, Rahul ^a,b   Ashe, James ^a,b  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FEMALE; FORCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MEMORY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENT, CONTROLLED; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

EID: 33846463105     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00773.2006     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bock O, Abeele S, Eversheim U. Human adaptation to rotated vision: interplay of a continuous and a discrete process. Exp Brain Res 152: 528-532, 2003.
2. Brashers-Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E. Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382: 252-255, 1996.
3. Caithness G, Osu R, Bays P, Chase H, Klassen J, Kawato M, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR. Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks. J Neurosci 24: 8662-8671, 2004.
4. Flanagan JR, Rao AK. Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. J Neurophysiol 74: 2174-2178, 1995.
5. Flanagan JR, Wing AM. The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of handheld loads. J Neurosci 17: 1519-1528, 1997.
6. Franklin DW, Osu R, Burdet E, Kawato M, Milner TE. Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model. J Neurophysiol 90: 3270-3282, 2003.
7. Fukushi T, Ashe J. Adaptation of arm trajectory during continuous drawing movements in different dynamic environments. Exp Brain Res 148: 95-104, 2003.
8. Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Bizzi E. Motor learning by field approximation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 3843-3846, 1996.
9. Haruno M, Wolpert DM, Kawato M. Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Comput 13: 2201-2220, 2001.
10. Jordan MI, Rumelhart DE. Forward models: supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cogn Sci 16: 307-354, 1992.
11. Karniel A, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment? Exp Brain Res 143: 520-524, 2002.
12. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 2: 1026-1031, 1999.
13. Krakauer JW, Ghez C, Ghilardi MF. Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting. J Neurosci 25: 473-478, 2005.
14. Krouchev NI, Kalaska JF. Context-dependent anticipation of different task dynamics: rapid recall of appropriate motor skills using visual cues. J Neurophysiol 89: 1165-1175, 2003.
15. Lackner JR, Dizio P. Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J Neurophysiol 72: 299-313, 1994.
16. Morasso P. Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42: 223-227, 1981.
17. Osu R, Hirai S, Yoshioka T, Kawato M. Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand. Nat Neurosci 7: 111-112, 2004.
18. Rao AK and Shadmehr R. Contextual cues facilitate learning of multiple models of arm dynamics. Soc Neurosci Abstr 302.4, 2001.
19. Scheidt RA, Dingwell JB, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Learning to move amid uncertainty. J Neurophysiol 86: 971-985, 2001.
20. Shadmehr R, Brashers-Krug T. Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory. J Neurosci 17: 409-419, 1997.
21. Shadmehr R and Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224, 1994.
22. Shadmehr R, Donchin O, Hwang E-J, Hemminger SE, Rao A. Learning dynamics of reaching. In: Motor Cortex and Voluntary Movements, edited by Vaadia E. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 2005, p. 297-328.
23. Takahashi CD, Scheidt RA, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Impedance control and internal model formation when reaching in a randomly varying dynamical environment. J Neurophysiol 86: 1047-1051, 2001.
24. Tong C, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR. Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study. J Neurosci 22: 1108-1113, 2002.
25. Wada Y, Kawabata Y, Kotosaka S, Yamamoto K, Kitazawa S, Kawato M. Acquisition and contextual switching of multiple nternal models for different viscous force fields. Neurosci Res 46: 319-331, 2003.
26. Wigmore V, Tong C, Flanagan JR. Visuomotor rotations of varying size and direction compete for a single internal model in motor working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28: 447-457, 2002.
27. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269: 1880-1882, 1995.
28. Wolpert DM, Kawato M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw 11: 1317-1329, 1998.