Multicenter comparison of high concentration contrast agent iomeprol-400 with iso-osmolar iodixanol-320: Contrast enhancement and heart rate variation in coronary dual-source computed tomographic angiography

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 457-464

  Becker, Cristoph R ^a   Vanzulli, Angelo ^b   Fink, Christian ^c   De Faveri, Daniele ^d   Fedeli, Stefano ^e   Dore, Roberto ^f   Biondetti, Pietro ^g   Kuettner, Alex ^h   Krix, Martin ⁱ   Ascenti, Giorgio ^j  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b OSPEDALE NIGUARDA CA GRANDA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^e SAN CAMILLO FORLANINI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^f FONDAZIONE IRCCS POLICLINICO SAN MATTEO   (Italy)

^g FONDAZIONE IRCCS CA GRANDA OSPEDALE MAGGIORE POLICLINICO   (Italy)

^h UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

ⁱ Bracco Imaging Germany   (Germany)

^j UNIVERSITY OF MESSINA   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

Coronary arteries; Dual source computed tomography; Heart rate; Hounsfield units (HU); Iodixanol; Iomeprol

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; IODINE; IODIXANOL; IOMEPROL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY DUAL SOURCE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HUMAN; INFUSION RATE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 79959931045     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31821c7ff4     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Cademartiri F, de Monye C, Pugliese F, et al. High iodine concentration contrast material for noninvasive multislice computed tomography coronary angiography: iopromide 370 versus iomeprol 400. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:349-353. (Pubitemid 44406197)
2. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, van der Lugt A, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at helical 16-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of iodine concentration on vascular attenuation. Radiology. 2005;236:661-665. (Pubitemid 41023456)
3. Klow NE, Jacobsen EA, Refsum H. Cardioangiography and the hemodynamic effects of iodixanol. Acta Radiol Suppl. 1995;399:93-99.
4. Achenbach S, Anders K, Kalender WA. Dual-source cardiac computed tomography: image quality and dose considerations. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1188-1198.
5. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography is improved at low heart rates. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2006;22:101-105. (Pubitemid 43372360)
6. Rist C, Johnson TR, Becker CR, et al. New applications for noninvasive cardiac imaging: dual-source computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(suppl 6):F16-F25. (Pubitemid 351337904)
7. Husmann L, Herzog BA, Burkhard N, et al. Body physique and heart rate variability determine the occurrence of stair-step artifacts in 64-slice CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1698-1703.
8. Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Tsiflikas I, et al. Dual-source CT: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology. 2008;247:346-355.
9. Dawson P, Cosgrove DO, Grainger RG. Textbook of Contrast Media. London, England: Taylor & Francis, Inc; 1999.
10. Spataro RF, Katzberg RW, Fischer HW, et al. High-dose clinical urography with the low-osmolality contrast agent Hexabrix: comparison with a conventional contrast agent. Radiology. 1987;162:9-14. (Pubitemid 17001773)
11. Klinke WP, Grace M, Miller R, et al. A multicenter randomized trial of ionic (ioxaglate) and nonionic (iopamidol) low osmolality contrast agents in cardiac angiography. Clin Cardiol. 1989;12:689-696. (Pubitemid 20025693)
12. Werner GS, Schmidt T, Scholz KH, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic effects of a new low osmolar nonionic and a standard ionic contrast agent after left ventriculography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1994;33:11-19.
13. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:256-268. (Pubitemid 43149624)
14. Rist C, Johnson TR, Müller-Starck J, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography using dual-source computed tomography in patients with atrial fibrillation. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:159-167.
15. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2265-2270. (Pubitemid 38757596)
16. Bae T. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology. 2010;256:32-61.
17. Loewe C, Becker CR, Berletti R, et al. 64-Slice CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and abdominal arteries: comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol 350 mgI/mL versus iomeprol 400 mgI/mL in a prospective, randomised, double-blind multi-centre trial. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:572-583.
18. Bååth L, Besjakov J, Oksendal A. Sodium-calcium balance in nonionic contrast media. Effects on the risk of ventricular fibrillation in the isolated rabbit heart. Invest Radiol. 1993;28:223-227. (Pubitemid 23163268)
19. Jynge P, Holten T, Oksendal AN. Sodium-calcium balance and cardiac function with isotonic iodixanol: an experimental study in the isolated rat heart. Invest Radiol. 1993;28:20-25. (Pubitemid 23086385)
20. Jynge P. Sodium-calcium balance in coronary angiography and experimental experience with iodixanol. Eur Radiol. 1996;6(suppl 2):S8-S12. (Pubitemid 126487656)
21. Murdock DK, Euler DE, Kozeny G, et al. Ventricular fibrillation during coronary angiography in dogs: the role of calcium-binding additives. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54:897-901. (Pubitemid 14006168)
22. Schmid I, Didier D, Pfammatter T, et al. Effects of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on patient heart rate and pressures during intra-cardiac or intra-arterial injection. Int J Cardiol. 2007;118:389-396. (Pubitemid 46678255)
23. Manninen H, Tahvanainen K, Borch KW, et al. Iodixanol, a new non-ionic, dimeric contrast medium in cardioangiography: a double-masked, parallel comparison with iopromide. Eur Radiol. 1995;5:364-370.
24. Svensson A, Ripsweden J, Rück A, et al. Heart rate variability and heat sensation during CT coronary angiography: low-osmolar versus iso-osmolar contrast media. Acta Radiol. 2010;51:722-726.
25. Herzog C, Zwerner PL, Doll JR, et al. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology. 2007;244:112-120. (Pubitemid 46981964)
26. Rixe J, Rolf A, Conradi G, et al. Detection of relevant coronary artery disease using dual-source computed tomography in a high probability patient series: comparison with invasive angiography. Circ J. 2009;73:316-322.
27. Onuma Y, Tanabe K, Chihara R, et al. Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Am Heart J. 2007;154:519-516.
28. Grosse C, Globitis S, Hergan K. Forty-slice computed tomography of the coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and diagnostic accuracy in a non-selected patient population. Acta Radiol. 2007;48:36-44. (Pubitemid 46324033)