Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography

American Heart Journal

Volumn 154, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 519-526

  Onuma, Yoshinobu ^a   Tanabe, Kengo ^a   Chihara, Ruri ^a   Yamamoto, Hirosada ^a   Miura, Yujiro ^a   Kigawa, Ikutaro ^a   Fukuda, Sachito ^a   Miyairi, Takeshi ^a   Nakajima, Hiroyoshi ^a   Hara, Kazuhiro ^a  

^a MITSUI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY GRAFT; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISTAL RUNOFF ARTERY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VEIN GRAFT;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34547997694     PISSN: 00028703     EISSN: 10976744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.04.054     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Rihal C.S., Raco D.L., Gersh B.J., and Yusuf S. Indications for coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic stable angina: review of the evidence and methodological considerations. Circulation 108 (2003) 2439-2445
2. Goldman S., Zadina K., Moritz T., et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 44 (2004) 2149-2156
3. Bourassa M.G., Enjalbert M., Campeau L., et al. Progression of atherosclerosis in coronary arteries and bypass grafts: ten years later. Am J Cardiol 53 (1984) 102-107
4. Tan E.S., van der Meer J., Jan de Kam P., et al. Worse clinical outcome but similar graft patency in women versus men one year after coronary artery bypass graft surgery owing to an excess of exposed risk factors in women. CABADAS. Research Group of the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands. Coronary Artery Bypass graft occlusion by Aspirin, Dipyridamole and Acenocoumarol/phenoprocoumon Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 34 (1999) 1760-1768
5. Alderman E.L., Kip K.E., Whitlow P.L., et al. Native coronary disease progression exceeds failed revascularization as cause of angina after five years in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). J Am Coll Cardiol 44 (2004) 766-774
6. Ryan T.J. The coronary angiogram and its seminal contributions to cardiovascular medicine over five decades. Circulation 106 (2002) 752-756
7. Kennedy J.W. Complications associated with cardiac catheterization and angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 8 (1982) 5-11
8. Chiurlia E., Menozzi M., Ratti C., et al. Follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 95 (2005) 1094-1097
9. Marano R., Storto M.L., Maddestra N., et al. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol 14 (2004) 1353-1362
10. Martuscelli E., Romagnoli A., D'Eliseo A., et al. Evaluation of venous and arterial conduit patency by 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 110 (2004) 3234-3238
11. Nieman K., Pattynama P.M., Rensing B.J., et al. Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology 229 (2003) 749-756
12. Ropers D., Ulzheimer S., Wenkel E., et al. Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. Am J Cardiol 88 (2001) 792-795
13. Salm L.P., Bax J.J., Jukema J.W., et al. Comprehensive assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting by 16-detector-row computed tomography. Am Heart J 150 (2005) 775-781
14. Schlosser T., Konorza T., Hunold P., et al. Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 44 (2004) 1224-1229
15. Stauder N.I., Kuttner A., Schroder S., et al. Coronary artery bypass grafts: assessment of graft patency and native coronary artery lesions using 16-slice MDCT. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 2512-2520
16. Pache G., Saueressig U., Frydrychowicz A., et al. Initial experience with 64-slice cardiac CT: non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts. Eur Heart J 27 (2006) 976-980
17. Sato Y., Matsumoto N., Kato M., et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease by multislice spiral computed tomography using a new retrospectively ECG-gated image reconstruction technique. Circ J 67 (2003) 401-405
18. Austen W.G., Edwards J.E., Frye R.L., et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51 4 Suppl (1975) 5-40
19. Garcia M.J., Lessick J., and Hoffmann M.H. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 296 (2006) 403-411
20. Griner P.F., Mayewski R.J., Mushlin A.I., et al. Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Principles and applications. Ann Intern Med 94 4 Pt 2 (1981) 557-592
21. Mollet N.R., Cademartiri F., van Mieghem C.A., et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112 (2005) 2318-2323
22. Raff G.L., Gallagher M.J., O'Neill W.W., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 552-557
23. Coles D.R., Smail M.A., Negus I.S., et al. Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 47 (2006) 1840-1845
24. Trabold T., Buchgeister M., Kuttner A., et al. Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating. Rofo 175 (2003) 1051-1055
25. Ferencik M., Nomura C.H., Maurovich-Horvat P., et al. Quantitative parameters of image quality in 64-slice computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries. Eur J Radiol 57 (2006) 373-379
26. Giesler T., Baum U., Ropers D., et al. Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 (2002) 911-916
27. Nieman K., Rensing B.J., van Geuns R.J., et al. Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography: impact of heart rate. Heart 88 (2002) 470-474
28. Schroeder S., Kopp A.F., Kuettner A., et al. Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography: experience in 94 patients. Clin Imaging 26 (2002) 106-111