Heart rate variability and heat sensation during CT coronary angiography: Low-osmolar versus iso-osmolar contrast media

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 51, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 722-726

  Svensson, Anders ^a,b   Ripsweden, Jonaz ^a   Rück, Andreas ^b   Aspelin, Peter ^a   Cederlund, Kerstin ^a   Brismar, B Torkel ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Contrast medium; CTCA; Heart rate; MDCT

Indexed keywords

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIUM; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CTCA; HEART ARRHYTHMIAS; HEART BEATS; HEART RATE; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HEART RATES; MDCT; MEAN DEVIATION; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIA; HEART; IMAGE QUALITY; SCANNING;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DRUG DERIVATIVE; IODIXANOL; IODOBENZOIC ACID DERIVATIVE; IOMEPROL; IOPAMIDOL;

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HEAT; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OSMOLARITY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HOT TEMPERATURE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IOPAMIDOL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; PAIN MEASUREMENT; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TRIIODOBENZOIC ACIDS;

EID: 77955695159     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02841851.2010.488249     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Flohr TG, Ohnesorge BM. Imaging of the heart with computed tomography. Basic Res Cardiol 2008;103:161-173
2. Lawler LP, Pannu HK, Fishman EK. MDCT evaluation of the coronary arteries, 2004: how we do it -data acquisition, postprocessing, display, and interpretation. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1402-1412
3. Pannu HK, Johnson PT, Fishman EK. 64 Slice multidetector row cardiac CT. Emerg Radiol 2009;16:1-10.
4. Maruyama T, Takada M, Hasuike T, Yoshikawa A, Namimatsu E, Yoshizumi T. Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1450-1455
5. Nicol ED, Arcuri N, Rubens MB, Padley SP. Considerations when introducing a new cardiac MDCT service. Avoiding the pitfalls. Clin Radiol 2008;63:355-369
6. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, Desbiolles L, Husmann L, Plass A, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006;241:378-385
7. Leschka S, Scheffel H, Husmann L, Gamperli O, Marincek B, Kaufmann PA, et al. Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:1583-1590 (Pubitemid 351798529)
8. Dawson P. Chemotoxicity of contrast media and clinical adverse effects: a review. Invest Radiol 1985;20(1 Suppl):S84 -91.
9. Koeda T, Motegi I, Ichikawa T, Suzuki T, Kato M. Changes in hemodynamics due to the contrast medium during left ventriculography. Angiology 1987;38:825-832
10. Almen T. Contrast media: the relation of chemical structure, animal toxicity and adverse clinical effects. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:2F -8F.
11. Hirshfeld JW Jr. Cardiovascular effects of iodinated contrast agents. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:9F -17F.
12. D awson P. Cardiovascular effects of contrast agents. Am J Cardiol 1989;64:2E -9E.
13. D awson P. Cardiovascular effects of contrast agents. Am J Cardiol 1989;64:2E -9E.
14. Kinnison ML, Powe NR, Steinberg EP. Results of randomized controlled trials of low-versus high-osmolality contrast media. Radiology 1989;170:381-389
15. Mancini GB, Bloomquist JN, Bhargava V, Stein JB, Lew W, Slutsky RA, et al. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:1218-1222
16. Bettmann MA, Bourdillon PD, Barry WH, Brush KA, Levin DC. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent. Radiology 1984;153:583-587
17. Flinck A, Selin K, Bjorneld L, Nossen JO. Iodixanol and iohexol in cardioangiography. A comparative vectorcardiographic study. Acta Radiol 2000;41:384-389
18. Bergstra A, van Dijk RB, Brekke O, Buurma AE, Orozco L, den Heijer P, et al. Hemodynamic effects of iodixanol and iohexol during ventriculography in patients with compromised left ventricular function. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;50:314-321
19. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976;16:31-41.
20. M asui T, Katayama M, Kobayashi S, Sakahara H. Intravenous injection of high and medium concentrations of computed tomography contrast media and related heat sensation, local pain, and adverse reactions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005;29:704-708
21. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51:5-40.
22. Schmid I, Didier D, Pfammatter T, Garachemani A, Fleisch M, Kirchin MA, et al. Effects of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on patient heart rate and pressures during intra-cardiac or intra-arterial injection. Int J Cardiol 2007;118:389-396
23. Manke C, Marcus C, Page A, Puey J, Batakis O, Fog A. Pain in femoral arteriography. A double-blind, randomized, clinical study comparing safety and efficacy of the iso-osmolar iodixanol 270 mgI/ml and the low-osmolar iomeprol 300 mgI/ml in 9 European centers. Acta Radiol 2003;44:590-596
24. Grainger RG. Osmolality of intravascular radiological contrast media. Br J Radiol 1980;53:739-746
25. Litmanovich D, Zamboni GA, Hauser TH, Lin PJ, Clouse ME, Raptopoulos V. ECG-gated chest CT angiography with 64-MDCT and tri-phasic IV contrast administration regimen in patients with acute non-specific chest pain. Eur Radiol 2008;18:308-317
26. Carbone I, Francone M, Algeri E, Granatelli A, Napoli A, Kirchin MA, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2008;18:234-243 .
27. Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, Curry CA, Lane JL, Jennings RS, et al. Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 2008;246:742-753 .
28. Kerl JM, Ravenel JG, Nguyen SA, Suranyi P, Thilo C, Costello P, et al. Right heart: split-bolus injection of diluted contrast medium for visualization at coronary CT angiography. Radiology 2008;247:356-364