Effects of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on patient heart rate and pressures during intra-cardiac or intra-arterial injection

International Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 118, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 389-396

  Schmid, Isabelle ^a   Didier, Dominique ^b   Pfammatter, Thomas ^c   Garachemani, Ali ^a   Fleisch, Martin ^a   Kirchin, Miles A ^d   Meier, Bernhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d Bracco Imaging SpA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cardiac angiography; Comparative studies; Heart rate; Iodinated contrast agents; Peripheral digital subtraction angiography

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; IODIXANOL; IOMEPROL;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART RATE; HEART RHYTHM; HEART VENTRICLE PRESSURE; HEART VENTRICULOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAFETY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY DISEASE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INJECTIONS, INTRA-ARTERIAL; INJECTIONS, INTRALESIONAL; IOPAMIDOL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRIIODOBENZOIC ACIDS;

EID: 34247593028     PISSN: 01675273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.12.011     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Spataro R.F., Katzberg R.W., Fischer H.W., and McMannis M.J. High-dose clinical urography with the low-osmolality contrast agent Hexabrix: comparison with a conventional contrast agent. Radiology 162 (1987) 9-14
2. Klinke W.P., Grace M., Miller R., Naqvi S.Z., Roth D., and Roy L. A multicenter randomized trial of ionic (ioxaglate) and nonionic (iopamidol) low-osmolality contrast agents in cardiac angiography. Clin Cardiol 12 (1989) 689-696
3. Andersen P.E., Bolstad B., Berg K.J., Justesen P., Thayssen P., and Kloster Y.F. Iodixanol and ioxaglate in cardioangiography: a double-blind randomized phase III study. Clin Radiol 48 (1993) 268-272
4. Werner G.S., Schmidt T., Scholz K.H., Figulla H.R., and Kreuzer H. Comparison of hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic effects of a new low osmolar nonionic and a standard ionic contrast agent after left ventriculography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 33 (1994) 11-19
5. Morettin L.B., Zhan X., Sant'Ambrogio F.B., and Sant'Ambrogio G. Cardiorespiratory responses elicited by right atrial injections of iodinated contrast media. Comparative evaluation of four agents. Invest Radiol 29 (1994) 201-209
6. Jorgensen N.P., Nossen J.O., Borch K.W., et al. Safety and tolerability of iodixanol in healthy volunteers with reference to two monomeric X-ray contrast media. Eur J Radiol 15 (1992) 252-257
7. Hill J.A., Cohen M.B., Kou W.H., et al. Iodixanol, a new isosmotic nonionic contrast agent compared with iohexol in cardiac angiography. Am J Cardiol 74 (2004) 57-63
8. Hekster R.E., Morre H.H., Cleyndert P., et al. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with isotonic dimeric (iodixanol) and monomeric (iohexol) nonionic contrast media: radiographic, clinical and neurophysiological evaluation. Neuroradiology 37 (1995) 48-50
9. Baumgart D., Haude M., George G., et al. High-volume nonionic dimeric contrast medium: first experiences during complex coronary interventions. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 40 (1997) 241-246
10. Bergstra A., van Dijk R.B., Brekke O., et al. Hemodynamic effects of iodixanol and iohexol during ventriculography in patients with compromised left ventricular function. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 50 (2000) 314-321
11. Baglini R., Sesana M., Capuano C., Rosella M.G., Sardeo C., and Danzi G.B. Left ventricular diastolic impairment during coronary arteriography with a non-ionic contrast medium. Minerva Cardioangiol 52 (2004) 323-328
12. Nieman K., Rensing B.J., van Geuns R.J., et al. Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography: impact of heart rate. Heart 88 (2002) 470-474
13. Schroeder S., Kopp A.F., Kuettner A., et al. Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography: experience in 94 patients. Clin Imaging 26 (2002) 106-111
14. Choi H.S., Choi B.W., Choe K.O., et al. Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiographics 24 (2004) 787-800
15. Shim S.S., Kim Y., and Lim S.M. Improvement of image quality with beta-blocker premedication on ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 (2005) 649-654
16. Hoffmann M.H., Shi H., Manzke R., et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology 234 (2005) 86-97
17. Bley T.A., Ghanem N.A., Foell D., et al. Computed tomography coronary angiography with 370-millisecond gantry rotation time: evaluation of the best image reconstruction interval. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29 (2005) 1-5
18. Palmer F.J. The RACR survey of intravenous contrast media reactions. Final report. Australas Radiol 32 (1988) 426-428
19. Wolf G.L., Arenson R.L., and Cross A.P. A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 152 (1989) 939-944
20. Katayama H., Yamaguchi K., Kozuka T., Takashima T., Seez P., and Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 175 (1990) 621-628
21. Davidson C.J., Laskey W.K., Hermiller J.B., et al. Randomized trial of contrast media utilization in high-risk PTCA: the COURT trial. Circulation 101 (2000) 2172-2177
22. Sutton A.G., Finn P., Campbell P.G., et al. Early and late reactions following the use of iopamidol 340, iomeprol 350 and iodixanol 320 in cardiac catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol 15 (2003) 133-138
23. Sanz J., Rius T., Kuschnir P., et al. The importance of end-systole for optimal reconstruction protocol of coronary angiography with 16-slice multidetector computed tomography. Invest Radiol 40 (2005) 155-163
24. Ferencik M., Nomura C.H., Maurovich-Horvat P., et al. Quantitative parameters of image quality in 64-slice computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries. Eur J Radiol 57 (2006) 373-379
25. Mollet N.R., Cademartiri F., van Mieghem C.A.G., et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112 (2005) 2318-2323
26. Raff G.L., Gallagher M.J., O'Neill W.W., and Goldstein J.A. Diagnostic accuracy of non invasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 552-557
27. Achenbach S., Ropers D., Kuettner A., et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography - initial experience. Eur J Radiol 57 (2006) 331-335
28. Sharma S.K., and Kini A. Effect of nonionic radiocontrast agents on the occurrence of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with mild-moderate chronic renal insufficiency: pooled analysis of the randomized trials. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 65 (2005) 386-393