Assessment of dielectric contribution in the modeling of multi-ionic transport through nanofiltration membranes

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 378, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 214-223

  Escoda, Aurélie ^a   Déon, Sébastien ^a   Fievet, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Dielectric constant; Ionic mixtures; Membrane potential; Modeling; Nanofiltration

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTAL METHODS; IONIC MIXTURES; IONIC TRANSFER; KNOWLEDGE MODEL; MEMBRANE CHARGE; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; PORE RADIUS; PREDICTIVE MODELS; SOLUTE REJECTION; TERNARY MIXTURES; TRANSPORT EQUATION;

MIXTURES; NANOFILTRATION; RATING;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

CALCIUM ION;

ARTICLE; DIELECTRIC CONSTANT; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; ION TRANSPORT; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR MODEL; NANOFILTRATION; PHASE PARTITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; STEADY STATE; STEREOCHEMISTRY;

EID: 79959929523     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Moons K., Van der Bruggen B. Removal of micropollutants during drinking water production from surface water with nanofiltration. Desalination 2006, 199:245-247.
2. Radjenovic J., Petrovic M., Ventura F., Barceló D. Rejection of pharmaceuticals in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane drinking water treatment. Water Res. 2008, 42:3601-3610.
3. Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Removal of pollutants from surface water and groundwater by nanofiltration: overview of possible applications in the drinking water industry. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 122:435-445.
4. Zhang Y., Causserand C., Aimar P., Cravedi J.P. Removal of bisphenol A by a nanofiltration membrane in view of drinking water production. Water Res. 2006, 40:3793-3799.
5. Hilal N., Al-Zoubi H., Mohammad A.W., Darwish N.A. Nanofiltration of highly concentrated salt solutions up to seawater salinity. Desalination 2005, 184:315-326.
6. M'Nif A., Bouguecha S., Hamrouni B., Dhahbi M. Coupling of membrane processes for brackish water desalination. Desalination 2007, 203:331-336.
7. Pontié M., Dach H., Leparc J., Hafsi M., Lhassani A. Novel approach combining physico-chemical characterizations and mass transfer modelling of nanofiltration and low pressure reverse osmosis membranes for brackish water desalination intensification. Desalination 2008, 221:174-191.
8. Gozálvez-Zafrilla J.M., Sanz-Escribano D., Lora-García J., León Hidalgo M.C. Nanofiltration of secondary effluent for wastewater reuse in the textile industry. Desalination 2008, 222:272-279.
9. Murthy Z.V.P., Chaudhari L.B. Rejection behavior of nickel ions from synthetic wastewater containing Na2SO4, NiSO4, MgCl2 and CaCl2 salts by nanofiltration and characterization of the membrane. Desalination 2009, 247:610-622.
10. Garcia F., Ciceron D., Saboni A., Alexandrova S. Nitrate ions elimination from drinking water by nanofiltration: membrane choice. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 52:196-200.
11. Sarkar S., SenGupta A.K. A new hybrid ion exchange-nanofiltration (HIX-NF) separation process for energy-efficient desalination: process concept and laboratory evaluation. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 324:76-84.
12. Bowen W.R., Welfoot J.S. Predictive modelling of nanofiltration: membrane specification and process optimisation. Desalination 2002, 147:197-203.
13. Van der Bruggen B., Mänttäri M., Nyström M. Drawbacks of applying nanofiltration and how to avoid them: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63:251-263.
14. Spiegler K.S., Kedem O. Thermodynamics of hyperfiltration (reverse osmosis): criteria for coefficient membranes. Desalination 1966, 1:311-326.
15. Wesselingh J.A., Vonk P., Kraaijeveld G. Exploring the Maxwell-Stefan description of ion exchange. Chem. Eng. J. Biochem. Eng. 1995, 57:75-89.
16. Wang X.L., Tsuru T., Nakao S., Kimura S. Electrolyte transport through nanofiltration membranes by the space-charge model and the comparison with Teorell-Meyer-Sievers model. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 103:117-133.
17. Bowen W.R., Mukhtar H. Characterisation and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 112:263-274.
18. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W., Hilal N. Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes - use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 126:91-105.
19. Bowen W.R., Welfoot J.S. Modelling of membrane nanofiltration-pore size distribution effects. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57:1393-1407.
20. Bandini S. Modelling the mechanism of charge formation in NF membranes: theory and application. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 264:75-86.
21. Fievet P., Sbai M., Szymczyk A., Vidonne A. Determining the [zeta]-potential of plane membranes from tangential streaming potential measurements: effect of the membrane body conductance. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 226:227-236.
22. Cañas A., Ariza M.J., Benavente J. Characterization of active and porous sublayers of a composite reverse osmosis membrane by impedance spectroscopy, streaming and membrane potentials, salt diffusion and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 183:135-146.
23. Schaep J., Vandecasteele C. Evaluating the charge of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 188:129-136.
24. Bouranene S., Fievet P., Szymczyk A. Investigating nanofiltration of multi-ionic solutions using the steric, electric and dielectric exclusion model. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2009, 64:3789-3798.
25. Déon S., Dutournié P., Bourseau P. Transfer of monovalent salts through nanofiltration membranes: a model combining transport through pores and the polarization layer. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46:6752-6761.
26. Déon S., Dutournié P., Limousy L., Bourseau P. Transport of salt mixtures through nanofiltration membranes: numerical identification of electric and dielectric contributions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 69:225-233.
27. Hagmeyer G., Gimbel R. Modelling the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes for ternary ion mixtures and for single salts at different pH values. Desalination 1998, 117:247-256.
28. Escoda A., Lanteri Y., Fievet P., Déon S., Szymczyk A. Determining the dielectric constant inside pores of nanofiltration membranes from membrane potential measurements. Langmuir 2010, 26:14628-14635.
29. Lanteri Y., Szymczyk A., Fievet P. Influence of steric, electric, and dielectric effects on membrane potential. Langmuir 2008, 24:7955-7962.
30. Lanteri Y., Szymczyk A., Fievet P. Membrane potential in multi-ionic mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113:9197-9204.
31. Déon S. Transfert d'espèces ioniques dans les membranes de nanofiltration: Etude expérimentale et modélisation de la sélectivité 2010, Editions Universitaires Européennes, Sarrebruck.
32. Déon S., Dutournié P., Bourseau P. Modeling nanofiltration with Nernst-Planck approach and polarization layer. AIChE J. 2007, 53:1952-1969.
33. Déon S., Dutournié P., Limousy L., Bourseau P. The two-dimensional pore and polarization transport model to describe mixtures separation by nanofiltration: model validation. AIChE J. 2011, 57:985-995.
34. Combe C., Guizard C., Aimar P., Sanchez V. Experimental determination of four characteristics used to predict the retention of a ceramic nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 129:147-160.
35. Bowen W.R., Welfoot J.S., Williams P.M. Linearized transport model for nanofiltration: development and assessment. AIChE J. 2002, 48:760-773.
36. Szymczyk A., Fievet P. Investigating transport properties of nanofiltration membranes by means of a steric, electric and dielectric exclusion model. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 252:77-88.
37. Ferry J.D. Statistical evaluation of sieve constants in ultrafiltration. J. Gen. Physiol. 1935, 20:95-104.
38. Dresner L. Some remarks on the integration of extended Nernst-Planck equation in the hyperfiltration of multicomponent solutions. Desalination 1972, 10:27-46.
39. Tsuru T., Nakao S., Kimura S. Calculation of ion rejection by extended Nernst-Planck equation with charged reverse osmosis membranes for single and mixed electrolyte solutions. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1991, 24:511-517.
40. Bandini S., Vezzani D. Nanofiltration modeling: the role of dielectric exclusion in membrane characterization. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003, 58:3303-3326.
41. Bowen W.R., Welfoot J.S. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration-critical assessment and model development. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57:1121-1137.
42. Jonsson G., Benavente J. Determination of some transport coefficients for the skin and porous layer of a composite membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 1992, 69:29-42.
43. Benavente J., García J.M., de la Campa J.G., de Abajo J. Determination of some electrical parameters for two novel aliphatic-aromatic polyamide membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 114:51-57.
44. Escoda A., Fievet P., Lakard S., Szymczyk A., Déon S. Influence of salts on the rejection of polyethyleneglycol by an NF organic membrane: pore swelling and salting-out effects. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 347:174-182.
45. Murthy Z.V.P., Gupta S.K. Estimation of mass transfer coefficient using a combined nonlinear membrane transport and film theory model. Desalination 1997, 109:39-49.
46. Zydney A.L. Stagnant film model for concentration polarization in membrane systems. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 130:275-281.
47. Schock G., Miquel A. Mass transfer and pressure loss in spiral wound modules. Desalination 1987, 64:339-352.
48. Bargeman G., Vollenbroek J.M., Straatsma J., Schroen C.G.P.H., Boom R.M. Nanofiltration of multi-component feeds. Interactions between neutral and charged components and their effect on retention. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 247:11-20.
49. Wang X.L., Tsuru T., Togoh M., Nakao S., Kimura S. Evaluation of pore structure and electrical properties of nanofiltration membranes. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1995, 28:186-192.
50. Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteel C. Modelling the retention of uncharged molecules with nanofiltration. Water Res. 2002, 36:1360.
51. Yaroshchuk A., Karpenko L., Ribitsch V. Measurements of transient membrane potential after current switch-off as a tool to study the electrochemical properties of supported thin nanoporous layers. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109:7834-7842.
52. Benavente J., Silva V., Prádanos P., Palacio L., Hernández A., Jonson G. Comparison of the volume charge density of nanofiltration membranes obtained from retention and conductivity experiments. Langmuir 2010, 26:11841-11849.
53. Bruni L., Bandini S. The role of the electrolyte on the mechanism of charge formation in polyamide nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 308:136-151.
54. Déon S., Escoda A., Fievet P. A transport model considering charge adsorption inside pores to describe salts rejection by nanofiltration membranes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66:2823-2832.
55. Navarro R., González M.P., Saucedo I., Avila M., Prádanos P., Martínez F., Martín A., Hernández A. Effect of an acidic treatment on the chemical and charge properties of a nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 307:136-148.
56. Senapati S., Chandra A. Dielectric constant of water confined in a nanocavity. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105:5106-5109.
57. Koga Y., Westh P., Davies J.V., Miki K., Nishikawa K., Katayanagi H. Toward understanding the Hofmeister series. 1. Effects of sodium salts of some anions on the molecular organization of H2O. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108:8533-8541.
58. Zangi R. Can salting-in/salting-out ions be classified as chaotropes/kosmotropes?. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114:643-650.
59. R.A. Robinson, R.H. Stokes, Electrolytes solutions, In: Butterworths, London, 1965.