Transfer of monovalent salts through nanofiltration membranes: A model combining transport through pores and the polarization layer

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 46, Issue 21, 2007, Pages 6752-6761

  Déon, Sébastien ^a   Dutournié, Patrick ^a   Bourseau, Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BRETAGNE SUD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; POLARIZATION; PORE SIZE; SEPARATION; SOLUTIONS; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

SEPARATION PERFORMANCES; SOLUTE TRANSFER;

SALTS;

DIFFUSION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; POLARIZATION; PORE SIZE; SALTS; SEPARATION; SOLUTIONS; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 35548991019     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie061687k     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. Al-Sofi, A.-K. M. Seawater desalination - SWCC experience and vision. Desalination 2001, 135, 121.
2. Paugam, L.; Diawara, C. K.; Schlumpf, J. P.; Jaouen, P.; Quemeneur, F. Transfer of monovalent anions and nitrates especially through nanofiltration membranes in brackish water conditions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 40, 237.
3. Pontie, M.; Lhassani, A.; Diawara, C. K.; Elana, A.; Innocent, C.; Aureau, D.; Rumeau. M.; Croue, J. P.; Buisson, H.; Hemery, P. Seawater nanofiltration for the elaboration of usable salty waters. Desalination 2004, 167, 347.
4. Yu, S.; Gao, C.; Su, H.; Liu, M. Nanofiltration used for desalination and concentration in dye production. Desalination 2001, 140, 97.
5. De Witte, J.-P. Surface water potabilisation by means of a novel nanofiltration element. Desalination Annu. Meet. Eur.Desalination Soc. Desalination Environ. 1997, 108, 153.
6. Oumar Anne, C.; Trebouet, D.; Jaouen, P.; Quemeneur, F. Nanofiltration of seawater. fractionation of mono- and multi-valent cations. Desalination 2001, 140, 67.
7. Van der Bruggen, B.; Vandecasteele, C. Removal of pollutants from surface water and groundwater by nanofiltration: overview of possible applications in the drinking water industry. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 122, 435.
8. Combe, C.; Guizard, C.; Aimar, P.; Sanchez, V. Experimental determination of four characteristics used to predict the retention of a ceramic nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 129, 147.
9. Palmeri, J.; Sandeaux, J.; Sandeaux, R.; Lefebvre, X.; David, P.; Guizard, C.; Amblard, P.; Diaz, J.-F.; Lamaze, B. Modeling of multielectrolyte transport in charged ceramic and organic nanofilters using the computer simulation program NanoFlux. Desalination 2002, 147, 231.
10. Bowen, W. R.; Mohammad, A. W.; Hilal, N. Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes - use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 126, 91.
11. Szymczyk, A.; Labbez, C.; Fievet, P.; Vidonne, A.; Foissy, A.; Pagetti, J. Contribution of convection, diffusion and migration to electrolyte transport through nanofiltration membranes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 103, 77.
12. Gekas. V.; Olund, K. Mass transfer in the membrane concentration polarization layer under turbulent cross flow: II. Application to the characterization of ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1988, 37, 145.
13. Afonso, M. D.; De Pinho. M. N. Mass transfer modeling for salt transport in amphoteric nanofiltration membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1998, 37, 4118.
14. Minnikanti, V. S.; DasGupta, S.; De, S. Prediction of mass transfer coefficient with suction for turbulent flow in cross flow ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 157, 227.
15. Bhattacharjee, S.; Kim, A. S.; Elimelech, M. Concentration Polarization of Interacting Solute Particles in Cross-Flow Membrane Filtration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1999, 212, 81.
16. Dresner, L. Some remarks on the integration of extended Nernst-Planck equation in the hyperfiltration of multicomponent solutions. Desalination 1972, 10, 26.
17. Gross, R. J.; Osterle, J. F. Membrane transport caracteristics of ultrafine capillaries. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49, 228.
18. Straatsma, J.; Bargeman, G.; van der Horst, H. C.; Wesselingh, J. A. Can nanofiltration be fully predicted by a model? J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 198, 273.
19. Kedem, O.; Katchalsky, A. A physical interpretation of phenomenological coefficients of membrane permeability. J. Gen. Physiol. 1961, 45, 143.
20. Spiegler, K. S.; Kedem, O. Thermodynamics of hyperfiltration (Reverse Osmosis): Criteria for coefficient membranes. Desalination 1966, 1, 311.
21. Bowen, W. R.; Mukhtar, H. Characterisation and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 112, 263.
22. Yaroshchuk, A. E. Non-steric mechanisms of nanofiltration: superposition of Donnan and dielectric exclusion. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2001, 22-23, 143.
23. Szymczyk, A.; Fievet, P. Investigating transport properties of nanofiltration membranes by means of a steric, electric and dielectric exclusion model. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 252, 77.
24. Bandini, S.; Vezzani, D. Nanofiltration modeling: the role of dielectric exclusion in membrane characterization. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003, 58, 3303.
25. Bowen, W. R.; Welfoot, J. S. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration-critical assessment and model development. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57, 1121.
26. Schlögl, R. Membrane permeation in system far from equilibrium. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1966, 70, 400.
27. Deen, W. M. Hindered transport of large molecules in liquid -filled pores. AIChE. J. 1987, 33, 1409.
28. Anderson, J. L.; Quinn, J. A. Restricted transport in small pores: a model for steric exclusion and hindered particle motion. Biophys. J. 1974, 14, 130.
29. Lide, L. R. Handbook of chemistry and physics, 79th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1999.
30. Donnan, F. G. Theory of membrane equilibria and membrane potentials in the presence of non-dialysing electrolytes. A contribution to physical-chemical physiology. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 100, 45.
31. Ferry, J. D. Statistical evaluation of sieve constants in ultrafiltration. J. Gen. Physiol. 1935, 20, 95.
32. Born, M. Volumen and hydratationswärme der ionen. Z. Phys. Chem. 1920, 1, 45.
33. Yaroshchuk, A. E. Dielectric exclusion of ions from membranes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 85, 193.
34. Jonsson, G.; Boesen, C. E. Concentration polarization in a reverse osmosis test cell. Desalination 1977, 21, 1.
35. Nakao, S.; Kimura, S. Analysis of solutes rejection in ultrafiltration. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1981, 14, 32.
36. Van den Berg, G. B.; Racz, I. G.; Smolders, C. A. Mass transfer coefficients in cross-flow ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1989, 47, 25.
37. Wijmans, J. G.; Nakao, S.; Van Den Berg, J. W. A.; Troelstra, F. R.; Smolders, C. A. Hydrodynamic resistance of concentration polarization boundary layers in ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1985, 22, 117.
38. Gekas, V.; Hallstrom, B. Mass transfer in the membrane concentration polarization layer under turbulent cross flow: 1. Critical literature review and adaptation of existing sherwood correlations to membrane operations. J. Membr. Sci. 1987, 30, 153.
39. Bhattacharjee, S.; Chen, J. C.; Elimelech, M. Coupled model of concentration polarization and pore transport in cross flow nanofiltration. AIChE. J. 2001, 47, 2133.
40. Déon, S.; Dutournié, P.; Bourseau, P. Modeling nanofiltration with Nernst-Planck approach and polarization layer. AIChE. J., accepted for publication.
41. Bird, R. B.; Stewart, W. E.; Lightfoot, E. N. Transport phenomena; John Wiley & Sons Inc: New York, 2002.
42. Padet, J. Fluides, en écoulements; Masson, Paris, 1990.
43. Picioreanu, C.; Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Heijnen, J. J. A theoretical study on the effect of surface roughness on mass transport and transformation in biofilms. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2000, 68, 355.
44. Bowen, W. R.; Welfoot, J. S.; Williams, P. M. Linearized Transport Model for Nanofiltration: Development and Assessment. AIChE. J. 2002, 48, 760.
45. Szymczyk, A.; Fievet, P.; Reggiani, J. C.; Pagetti, J. Characterisation of surface properties of ceramic membranes by streaming and membrane potentials. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 146, 277.
46. Fievet, P.; Sbai, M.; Szymczyk, A.; Magnenet, C.; Labbez, C.; Vidonne, A. A new tangential streaming potential setup for the electrokinetic characterisation of tubular membranes. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2004, 39, 2931.
47. Hagmeyer, G.; Gimbel, R. Modelling the rejection of nanofiltration membranes using zeta potential measurements. Sep. Purif. Technol. 1999, 15, 19.
48. Afonso, M. D. Surface charge on loose nanofiltration membranes. Desalination Int. Congr. Membr. Membr. Process. 2006, 191, 262.
49. Peeters, J. M. M.; Mulder, M. H. V.; Strathmann, H. Streaming potential measurements as a characterization method for nanofiltration membranes. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 1999, 150, 247.
50. Bandini, S. Modelling the mechanism of charge formation in NF membranes: Theory and application. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 264, 75.
51. Robinson, R. A.; Stokes, R. H. Electrolytes solutions; Butterworths: Markham, Canada, 1965.