Removal of bisphenol A by a nanofiltration membrane in view of drinking water production

Water Research

Volumn 40, Issue 20, 2006, Pages 3793-3799

  Zhang, Y ^a,b   Causserand, C ^b   Aimar, P ^b   Cravedi, J P ^c  

^a SHENYANG NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b LABORATOIRE DE GÉNIE CHIMIQUE   (France)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Adsorption; Bisphenol A; Endocrine disrupters; Membrane; Nanofiltration; Retention mechanism

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT); NANOFILTRATION; PERMSELECTIVE MEMBRANES; PHENOLS;

BISPHENOL A; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTERS; OPERATING CONDITIONS; RETENTION MECHANISM;

POTABLE WATER;

4,4' ISOPROPYLIDENEDIPHENOL; CHLORIDE ION; DRINKING WATER; NATURAL ORGANIC MATTER; SODIUM ION;

ADSORPTION; CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT); NANOFILTRATION; PERMSELECTIVE MEMBRANES; PHENOLS; POTABLE WATER;

DRINKING WATER; MEMBRANE; PHENOLIC COMPOUND; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER TREATMENT;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; HYDRODYNAMICS; MEMBRANE FILTER; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; NANOFILTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEADY STATE; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RETENTION;

EID: 33750987645     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Agenson K.O., Oh J.I., and Urase T. Retention of a wide variety of organic pollutants by different nanofiltration/reverse osmosis membranes: controlling parameters of process. J. Memb. Sci. 225 (2003) 91-103
2. Bargeman G., Vollenbroek J.M., Straatsma J., Schroën C.G.P.H., and Boom R.M. Nanofiltration of multi-component feeds. Interactions between neutral and charged components and their effect on retention. J. Memb. Sci. 247 (2005) 11-20
3. Bouchoux A., Roux-de Balmann H., and Lutin F. Nanofiltration of glucose and sodium lactate solutions. Variations of retention between single- and mixed-solute solutions. J. Memb. Sci. 258 (2005) 123-132
4. Braeken L., Ramaekers R., Zhang Y., Maes G., Van der Bruggen B., and Vandecasteele C. Influence of hydrophobicity on retention in nanofiltration of aqueous solutions containing organic compounds. J. Memb. Sci. 252 (2005) 195-203
5. Causserand C., Aimar P., Cravedi J.P., and Singlande E. Dichloroaniline retention by nanofiltration membranes. Water Res. 39 (2005) 1594-1600
6. Devitt E.C., Ducellier F., Cote P., and Wiesner M.R. Effects of natural organic matter and the raw water matrix on the rejection of atrazine by pressure-driven membranes. Water Res. 32 9 (1998) 2563-2568
7. Hagmeyer G., and Gimbel R. Modelling the rejection of nanofiltration membranes using zeta potential measurements. Sep. Purif. Technol. 15 (1999) 19-30
8. Kagawa Y., Takano I., Yaguchi K., Yasuda K., and Suzuki T. Environmental fate of bisphenol A and its biological metabolites in river water and their xeno-estrogenic activity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (2004) 2389-2396
9. Kimura K., Amy G., Drewes J., and Watanabe Y. Adsorption of hydrophobic compounds onto NF/RO membranes: an artefact leading to overestimation of rejection. J. Memb. Sci. 221 (2003) 89-101
10. Kimura K., Toshima S., Amy G., and Watanabe Y. Rejection of neutral endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) and pharmaceutical active compounds (PhACs) by RO membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 245 (2004) 71-78
11. Kiso Y., Nishimura Y., Kitao T., and Nishimura K. Rejection properties of non-phenylic pesticides with nanofiltration membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 171 (2000) 229-237
12. Kosutic K., and Kunst B. Removal of organics from aqueous solutions by commercial RO and NF membranes of characterized porosities. Desalination 142 1 (2002) 47-56
13. Krishnan A.V., Stathis P., Permuth S.F., Tokes L., and Feldman D. Bisphenol-A: an estrogenic substance is released from polycarbonate flasks during autoclaving. Endocrinology 132 (1993) 2279-2286
14. Kuramitza H., Matsushita M., and Tanaka S. Electrochemical removal of bisphenol A based on the anodic polymerization using a column type carbon fiber electrode. Water Res. 38 (2004) 2331-2338
15. Nghiem L.D., Schafer A.I., and Waite T.D. Adsorption of estrone on nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes in water and wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 46 4-5 (2002) 265-272
16. Nghiem L.D., McCutcheon J., Schäfer A.I., and Elimelech M. The role of endocrine disrupters in water recycling: risk or mania?. Water Sci. Technol. 50 2 (2004) 215-220
17. Schaep J., Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C., and Wilms D. Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 14 (1998) 155-162
18. Staples C.A., Dom P.B., Klecka G.M., Oblook S.T., and Harris L.R. A Review of the environmental fate, effects, and exposures of bisphenol A. Chemosphere 36 10 (1998) 2149-2173
19. Taylor, J.S., Chen, S.-S.L., Mulford, A., Norris, C.D., 2000. Flat sheet, bench and pilot testing for pesticide removal using reverse osmosis, AWWA Research Foundation Report, Denver, CO.
20. Van der Bruggen B., Schaep J., Maes W., Wilms D., and Vandecasteele C. Nanofiltration as a treatment method for the removal of pesticides from ground water. Desalination 117 (1998) 139-147
21. Van der Bruggen B., Schaep J., Wilms D., and Vandecasteele C. Influence of molecular size, polarity and charge on the retention of organic molecules by nanofiltration. J. Memb. Sci. 156 (1999) 29-41
22. Ying G.G., Kookana S.R., and Dillon P. Sorption and degradation of selected five endocrine disrupting chemicals in aquifer material. Water Res. 37 (2003) 3785-3791
23. Zhou D., Wu F., Deng N., and Xiang W. Photooxidation of bisphenol A (BPA) in water in the presence of ferric and carboxylate salts. Water Res. 38 (2004) 4107-4116