Effect of an acidic treatment on the chemical and charge properties of a nanofiltration membrane

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 307, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 136-148

  Navarro, R ^a   Gonzalez M P ^a   Saucedo, I ^a   Avila, M ^a   Pradanos P ^b   Martinez F ^b   Martin A ^b   Hernandez A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUANAJUATO   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Acid pre treatment; DS5 DL nanofiltration membrane; DSPM; Membrane charge; Streaming potential

Indexed keywords

ENERGY DISPERSIVE SPECTROSCOPY; HYDROLYSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SOLUTIONS;

ACID PRE-TREATMENT; DS5 DL NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANE; MEMBRANE CHARGE; STREAMING POTENTIAL;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

PHOSPHORIC ACID; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ENERGY DISPERSIVE SPECTROSCOPY; HYDROLYSIS; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SOLUTIONS;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; HYDROLYSIS; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; ISOTHERM; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; NANOFILTRATION; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTROCHEMICAL MICROSCOPY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 37149027053     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.09.015     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology. 2nd ed. (1996), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherland 564 pp
2. Khedr M.G. Development of reverse osmosis desalination membranes composition and configuration: future prospects. Desalination 153 (2003) 295-304
3. Asfardjani K., Segui Y., Aurelle Y., and Abidine N. Effect of plasma treatments on wettability of polysulfones and poly(ether imide)s. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 43 (1991) 271-281
4. Dimov A., and Islam M. Hydrophilization of polyethylene membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 50 (1990) 97-100
5. Sedath R.H., Taylor D.R., and Li N.N. Reduced fouling of ultrafiltration membranes via surface fluorination. Sep. Sci. Technol. 28 (1993) 255-269
6. Dimov A., and Islam M.A. Sulfonation of polyethylene membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 42 (1991) 1285-1287
7. Mukherjee D., Kulkarni A., Chawla A., and Gill W.N. Ultrapurification and recycling of hydrofluoric acid etching solutions by reverse osmosis: membrane performance and multicomponent rejection. Chem. Eng. Commun. 130 (1994) 127-138
8. Mukherjee D., Kulkarni A., and Gill W.N. Flux enhancement of reverse osmosis membranes by chemical surface modification. J. Membr. Sci. 97 (1994) 231-249
9. Kulkarni A., Mukherjee D., and Gill W.N. Flux enhancement by hydrophilization of thin film composite reverse osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 114 (1996) 39-50
10. González M.P., Navarro R., Saucedo I., Avila M., Revilla J., and Bouchard Ch. Purification of phosphoric acid solutions by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration. Desalination 147 (2002) 315-320
11. González Muñoz M.P., Navarro R., Saucedo I., Avila M., Prádanos P., Palacio L., Martínez F., Martín A., and Hernández A. Hydrofluoric acid treatment for improved performance of a nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 191 (2006) 273-278
12. González M.P., Saucedo I., Navarro R., Prádanos P., Palacio L., Martínez F., Martín A., and Hernández A. Effect of phosphoric and hydrofluoric acid on the structure and permeation of a nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 281 (2006) 177-185
13. Tsuru T., Nakao S., and Kimura S. Effective charge-density and pore structure of charged ultrafiltration membranes. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 23 (1990) 604-610
14. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W., and Hilal N. Characterization of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes-use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 126 (1997) 91-105
15. Bowen W.R., and Welfoot J.S. Predictive modelling of nanofiltration: membrane specification and process optimisation. Desalination 147 (2002) 197-203
16. Labbez C., Fievet P., Szymczyk A., Thomas F., Simon C., Vidonne A., Pagetti J., and Foissy A. A comparison of membrane charge of a low nanofiltration ceramic membrane determined from ionic retention and tangential streaming potential measurements. Desalination 147 (2002) 223-229
17. Szymczyk A., and Fievet P. Investigating transport properties of nanofiltration membranes by means of a steric, electric and dielectric exclusion model. J. Membr. Sci. 252 (2005) 77-88
18. Szymczyk A., Sbaï M., Fievet P., and Vidonne A. Transport properties and electrokinetic characterization of an amphoteric nanofilter. Langmuir 22 (2006) 3910-3919
19. Huisman I.H., Prádanos P., Calvo J.I., and Hernández A. Electroviscous effects, streaming potential and zeta potential in polycarbonate track-etched membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 178 (2000) 79-92
20. Pastor R., Calvo J.I., Prádanos P., and Hernández A. Surface charges and zeta potentials on polyethersulphone heteroporous membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 137 (1997) 109-119
21. Martínez F., Martín A., Malfeito J., Palacio L., Prádanos P., Tejerina F., and Hernández A. Streaming potential through and on ultrafiltration membranes-influence of salt retention. J. Membr. Sci. 206 (2002) 431-441
22. Huisman I.H., Prádanos P., and Hernández A. Electrokinetic characterisation of ultrafiltration membranes by streaming potential, electroviscous effect, and salt retention. J. Membr. Sci. 178 (2000) 55-64
23. Yaroshchuk A.E., and Ribitsch V. Role of channel wall conductance in the determination of ζ-potential from electrokinetic measurements. Langmuir 18 (2002) 2036-2038
24. Fievet P., Sbaï M., Szymczyk A., and Vidonne A. Determining the ζ-potential of plane membranes from tangential streaming potential measurements: effect of the membrane body conductance. J. Membr. Sci. 226 (2003) 227-236
25. Sbaï M., Szymczyk A., Fievet P., Sorin A., Vidonne A., Pellet-Rostaing S., Favre-Reguillon A., and Lemaire M. Influence of the membrane pore conductance on tangential streaming potential. Langmuir 19 (2003) 8867-8871
26. Labbez C., Fievet F., Thomas F., Szymczyk A., Vidonne A., Foissy A., and Pagetti P. Evaluation of the "DSPM" model on a titania membrane: measurements of charged and uncharged solute retention, electrokinetic charge, pore size and water permeability. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 262 (2003) 200-211
27. Szymczyk A., Fatin-Rouge N., Fievet P., Ramseyer C., and Vidonne A. Identification of dielectric effects in nanofiltration of metallic salts. J. Membr. Sci. 287 (2007) 102-110
28. Bandini S., and Vezzani D. Nanofiltration modeling: the role of dielectric exclusion in membrane characterization. Chem. Eng. Sci. 58 (2003) 3303-3326
29. Hernández A., Martínez F., Martín A., and Prádanos P. Porous structure and surface charge density on the walls of microporous alumina membranes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 173 (1995) 284-296
30. Calvo J.I., Hernández A., Prádanos P., and Tejerina F. Charge adsorption and zeta potential in cyclopore membranes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 181 (1996) 399-412
31. Bowen W.R., and Mukhtar H. Characterization and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 112 (1996) 263-274
32. Deen W.M., Satvat B., and Jamieson J.M. Theoretical model for glomerular filtration of charged solutes. Am. J. Physiol. 238 (1980) F126-F139
33. Deen W.M. Hindered transport of large molecules in liquid-filled pores. AIChE J. 33 (1987) 1409-1425
34. Bowen W.R., and Welfoot J.S. Modelling of membrane nanofiltration-pore size distribution effects. Chem. Eng. Sci. 57 (2002) 1393-1407
35. Yaroshchuk A.E. Dielectric exclusion of ions from membranes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 85 (2000) 193-230
36. Yaroshchuk A.E. Non-steric mechanisms of nanofiltration: superposition of Donnan and dielectric exclusion. Sep. Purif. Technol. 22/23 (2001) 143-158
37. Bandini S., and Gostoli C. A simplified approach for characterization and prediction of nanofiltration membranes performances. Proceedings of the Euromembrane'99. Leuwen, Belgium (1999) 388
38. Vezzani D., and Bandini S. Donnan equilibrium and dielectric exclusion for charaterization of nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 149 (2002) 477-483
39. Martín A., Martínez F., Malfeito J., Palacio L., Prádanos P., and Hernández A. Zeta potential of membranes as a function of pH-optimization of isoelectric point evaluation. J. Membr. Sci. 213 (2003) 225-230
40. Nakao S., and Kimura S. Analysis of solutes rejection in ultrafiltration. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 14 (1981) 32-37
41. Prádanos P., Arribas J.I., and Hernández A. Retention of proteins in cross-flow UF through asymmetric inorganic membranes. AIChE J. 40 (1994) 1901-1910
42. Matweb, Material Property Data, Automation Creations, Inc., (ACI) of Blacksburg, Virginia, http://www.matweb.com.
43. Roh I.J. Influence of rupture strength of interfacially polymerized thin film structure on the performance of polyamide composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 198 (2002) 63-74
44. Freger V., Gilron J., and Belfer S. TFC polyamide membranes modified by grafting of hydrophilic polymers: an FT-IR/AFM/TEM study. J. Membr. Sci. 209 (2002) 283-292
45. Wu S., Xing J., Zheng C., Xu G., Zheng G., and Xu J. Plasma modification of aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis composite membrane surface. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 64 (1997) 1923-1926