Modeling nanofiltration with Nernst-Planck approach and polarization layer

AIChE Journal

Volumn 53, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1952-1969

  Deon S ^a   Dutournle P ^a   Bourseau, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BRETAGNE SUD   (France)

Author keywords

2 D model; Extended Nernst Planck equation; Nanofiltration; Polarization layer; Transport phenomena

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); DIFFUSION; GLUCOSE; MEMBRANES; PERMITTIVITY; POLARIZATION; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

DONNAN STERIC PORE MODEL; NERNST PLANCK APPROACH; POLARIZATION LAYER;

NANOFILTRATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); DIFFUSION; GLUCOSE; MEMBRANES; NANOFILTRATION; PERMITTIVITY; POLARIZATION; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

EID: 34547659374     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: 15475905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.11207     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Combe C, Guizard C, Aimar P, Sanchez V. Experimental determination of four characteristics used to predict the retention of a ceramic nanofiltration membrane. J Membr Sci. 1997;129:147-160.
2. Gross RJ, Osterle JF. Membrane transport caracteristics of ultrafine capillaries. J Chem Phys. 1968;49:228-234.
3. Dresner L. Some remarks on the integration of extended Nernst-Planck equation in the hyperfiltration of multicomponent solutions. Desalination. 1972;10:27-46.
4. Hunter RJ. Zeta potential in colloid science. Principles and applications. 1981.
5. Schlögl R. Membrane permeation in system far from equilibrium. Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft Physik. Chem. 1966;70:400.
6. Noordman TR, Wesselingh JA. Transport of large molecules through membranes wiyh narrow pores. The Maxwell-Stefan description combined with hydrodynamic theory. J Membr Sci. 2002;210:227.
7. Straatsma J, Bargeman G, van der Horst HC, Wesselingh JA. Can nanofiltration be fully predicted by a model? / Membr Sci. 2002;198:273-284.
8. Krishna R, Wesselingh JA. The Maxwell-Stefan approach to mass transfert. Chem Eng Sci. 1997;52:861-911.
9. Kedem O, Katchalsky A. Permeability of composite membranes. Trans Faraday Soc. 1963;59:1941-1953.
10. Spiegler KS, Kedem O. Thermodynamics of hyperfiltration (Reverse Osmosis): criteria for coefficient membranes. Desalination. 1966; 1:311-326.
11. Murthy ZVP, Gupta SK. Estimation of mass transfer coefficient using a combined nonlinear membrane transport and film theory model. Desalination. 1997;109:39-49.
12. Zydney AL. Stagnant film model for concentration polarization in membrane systems. J Membr Sci. 1997;130:275-281.
13. Lefebvre X. Etude des modèles de transfert en nanofiltration. Application du modèle hybride basé sur les équations de Nernst-Planck étendues par le développement du logiciel de simulation "Nanoflux". Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier; 2003. PhD Theses.
14. Van den Berg GB, Racz IG, Smolders CA. Mass transfer coefficients in cross-flow ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci. 1989;47:25-51.
15. Bhattacharjee S, Chen JC, Elimelech M. Coupled model of concentration polarization and pore transport in cross flow nanofiltration. AIChE J. 2001;47:2733-2745.
16. Bowen WR, Mohammad AW. Diafiltration by nanofiltration: prediction and optimization. AIChE J. 1998;44:1799-1812.
17. Anderson JL, Quinn JA. Restricted transport in small pores: a model for steric exclusion and hindered particle motion. Biophys J. 1974; 14:130-150.
18. Deen WM. Hindered transport of large molecules in liquid-filled pores. AIChE J. 1987;33:1409-1425.
19. Bowen WR, Mukhtar H. Characterisation and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes. J of Membr Sci. 1996;112:263-274.
20. Bowen WR, Cassey B, Jones P, Oatley DL. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration-application to an industrially relevant separation. J of Membr Sci. 2004;242:211-220.
21. Hagmeyer G, Gimbel R. Modelling the rejection of nanofiltration membranes using zeta potential measurements. Sep and Purification Technol. 1999;15:19-30.
22. Schaep J, Vandecasteel C, Mohammad AW, Bowen WR. Analysis of salt retention of nanofiltration membranes using the Donnan-steric partioning pore model. Sep Sci. Technol. 1999;34(15):3009-3030.
23. Bowen WR, Welfoot JS, Williams PM. Linearized transport model for nanofiltration: development and assessment. AIChE J. 2002; 48:760-773.
24. Palmeri J, Sandeaux J, Sandeaux R, Lefebvre X, David P, Guizard C, Amblard P, Diaz J-F, Lamaze B. Modeling of multi-electrolyte transport in charged ceramic and organic nanofilters using the computer simulation program NanoFlux. Desalination. 2002;147:231-236.
25. Ferry JD. Statistical evaluation of sieve constants in ultrafiltration. J Gen Physiol. 1935;20:95-104.
26. Ferry JD. Ultrafilter membranes and ultrafiltration. Chem Rev. 1936; 18:373-455,
27. Deen WM, Satvat B, Jamieson M. Theoretical model for glomerular filtration of charged solutes. Am J Physiol. 1980;38:126-139.
28. Donnan FG. Theory of membrane equilibria and membrane potentials in the presence of non-dialysing electrolytes. A contribution to physical-chemical physiology. J Membr Sci. 1995;100:45-55.
29. Szymczyk A, Fievet P. Investigating transport properties of nanofiltration membranes by means of a steric, electric and dielectric exclusion model. J Membr Sci. 2005;252:77-88.
30. Hagmeyer G, Gimbel R. Modelling the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes for ternary ion mixtures and for single salts at different pH values. Desalination. 1998;117:247-256.
31. Robinson RA, Stokes RH. Electrolytes solutions. Butterworths. 1965.
32. Newman J, Thomas-Alyea KE. Electrochemical systems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2004.
33. Dukhin SS, Churaev NV, Shilov VN, Starov VM. Problems in the modeling of reverse osmosis separation. Russ Chem Rev. 1988; 57:572-584.
34. Yaroshchuk AE. Dielectric 'exclusion of ions from membranes. Ad Colloid Interf Sci. 2000;85:193-230.
35. Yaroshchuk AE. Non-steric mechanisms of nanofiltration: superposition of Donnan and dielectric exclusion. Sep Purif Technol. 2001; 22-23:143-158.
36. Israelachvili JN. Intermolecular and surface forces. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 1991.
37. Born M. Volumen and hydratationswärme der ionen. Z Physik Chem. 1920;1:45.
38. Bowen WR, Welfoot JS. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration-critical assessment and model development. Chem Eng Sci. 2002;57:1121-1137.
39. Bandini S, Vezzani D. Nanofiltration modeling: the role of dielectric exclusion in membrane characterization. Chem Eng Sci. 2003;58: 3303-3326.
40. Bhattacharjee S, Kim AS, Elimelech M. Concentration polarization of interacting solute particles in cross-flow membrane filtration. J Colloid Interf Sci. 1999;212:81-99.
41. Minnikanti VS, DasGupta S, De S. Prediction of mass transfer coefficient with suction for turbulent flow in cross flow ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci. 1999;157:227-239.
42. Paris J, Guichardon P, Charbit F. Transport phenomena in ultrafiltration: a new two-dimensional model compared with classical models. J Membr Sci. 2002;207:43-53.
43. Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN. Transport phenomena. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002.
44. Padet J. Fluides en écoulements. Paris: Masson. 1990.
45. Szymczyk A, Fievet P, Reggiani JC, Pagetti J. Characterisation of surface properties of ceramic membranes by streaming and membrane potentials. J Membr Sci. 1998;146:277-284.
46. Schaep J, Vandecasteele C. Evaluating the charge of nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci. 2001;188:129-136.
47. Fievet P, Szymczyk A, Aoubiza B, Pagetti J. Evaluation of three methods for the characterization of the membrane-solution interface: streaming potential, membrane potential and electrolyte conductivity inside pores. J Membr Sci. 2000;168:87-100.
48. Lide LR. Handbook of chemistry and physics. CRC Press; 1998.
49. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. Numerical recipes. Cambridge University Press; 1986.
50. Jonsson G, Boesen CE. Concentration polarization in a reverse osmosis test cell. Desalination. 1977;21:1-10.
51. Nakao S, Kimura S. Analysis of solutes rejection in ultrafiltration. J Chem Eng Jpn. 1981;14:32-37.
52. Wijmans JG, Nakao S, Van Den Berg JWA, Troelstra FR, Smolders CA. Hydrodynamic resistance of concentration polarization boundary layers in ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci. 1985;22:117-135.
53. Gekas V, Hallstrom B, Mass transfer in the membrane concentration polarization layer under turbulent cross flow: I. Critical literature review and adaptation of existing sherwood correlations to membrane operations. J Membr Sci. 1987;30:153-170.
54. Combe C. Estimation de la sélectivité en nanofiltration àpartir des propriétés du matériau membranaire. Modèles de transport. Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse; 1996. PhD Theses.
55. Szymczyk A, Sbai M, Fievet P, Vidonne A. Transport properties and electrokinetic characterization of an amphoteric nanofilter. Langmuir. 2006;22:3910-3919.
56. Szymczyk A, Fievet P, Ramseyer C. Dielectric constant of electrolyte solutions confined in a charged nanofiltration membrane. Desalination. 2006;200:125-126.
57. Morao AIC, Alves AMB, Afonso MD. Concentration of clavulanic acid broths: Influence of the membrane surface charge density on NF operation. J Membr Sci. 2006;281:417-428.
58. Senapati S, Chandra A. Dielectric constant of water confined in a nanocavity. J Phys Chem B. 2001;105:5106-5109.
59. Bandini S. Modelling the mechanism of charge formation in NF membranes: Theory and application. J. Membr Sci. 2005;264: 75-86.
60. Bowen WR, Mukhtar H. Characterisation and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci. 1996; 112:263-274.
61. Afonso MD. Surface charge on loose nanofiltration membranes. Desalination International Congress on Membranes and Membrane Processes. 2006;191:262-272.
62. Mazzoni C, Bandini S. On nanofiltration Desal-5 DK performances with calcium chloride-water solutions. Sep Purif Technol. 2006;52: 232-240.
63. De S, Bhattacharya PK. Mass transfer coefficient with suction including property variations in applications of cross-flow ultrafiltration. Sep Purif Technol. 1998;16:61-73.