Review: Minimally invasive versus conventional dynamic hip screw fixation in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Surgical Innovation

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 99-105

  Cheng, Tao ^a   Zhang, Guoyou ^b,c   Zhang, Xianlong ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^b WENZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

evidence based medicine surgery; hip fracture; minimally invasive surgery; orthopedic surgery

Indexed keywords

BLEEDING; BONE SCREW; COMORBIDITY; FEMUR INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; FRACTURE FIXATION; FRACTURE HEALING; HIP PROSTHESIS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REVIEW; SOFT TISSUE INJURY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE SCREWS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FRACTURE FIXATION, INTERNAL; FRACTURE HEALING; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; MALE; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79959926475     PISSN: 15533506     EISSN: 15533514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1553350611409062     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Verettas DA, Ifantidis P., Chatzipapas CN, et al. Systematic effects of surgical treatment of hip fractures: gliding screw-plating vs intramedullary nailing. Injury. 2010 ; 41: 279-284.
2. Anglen JO, Weinstein JN ; American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Research Committee. Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 ; 90: 700-707. (Pubitemid 351499956)
3. Lee YS, Huang HL, Lo TY, Huang CR Dynamic hip screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: a comparison of two fixation methods. Int Orthop. 2007 ; 31: 683-688.
4. Morris AH, Zuckerman JD National consensus conference on improving the continuum of care for patients with hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 ; 84: 670-674.
5. Alobaid A., Harvey EJ, Elder GM, Lander P., Guy P., Reindl R. Minimally invasive dynamic hip screw: prospective randomized trial of two techniques of insertion of a standard dynamic fixation device. J Orthop Trauma. 2004 ; 18: 207-212. (Pubitemid 38578784)
6. Ho M., Garau G., Walley G., et al. Minimally invasive dynamic hip screw for fixation of hip fractures. Int Orthop. 2009 ; 33: 555-560.
7. Wong TC, Chiu Y., Tsang WL, Leung WY, Yeung SH A double-blind, prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial of minimally invasive dynamic hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. Injury. 2009 ; 40: 422-427.
8. Wang JP, Yang TF, Kong QQ, et al. Minimally invasive technique versus conventional technique of dynamic hip screws for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010 ; 130: 613-620.
9. Wang J., Yang T., Kong Q., et al. Treatment of aged intertrochanteric fractures with minimally invasive dynamic hip screws. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 ; 23: 1071-1074.
10. Kuzyk PR, Guy P., Kreder HJ, Zdero R., McKee MD, Schemitsch EH Minimally invasive hip fracture surgery: are outcomes better ? J Orthop Trauma. 2009 ; 23: 447-453.
11. Waters TS, Gibbs DM, Dorrell JH, Powells DP Percutaneous dynamic hip screw. Injury. 2006 ; 37: 751-754. (Pubitemid 44066986)
12. Leung WY, Tsang WL Conventional muscle-reflection approach versus mini-incision muscle-splitting approach in dynamic hip screw fixation. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2008 ; 16: 156-161.
13. Chong KW, Wong MK, Rikhraj IS, Howe TS The use of computer navigation in performing minimally invasive surgery for intertrochanteric hip fractures-the experience in Singapore. Injury. 2006 ; 37: 755-762. (Pubitemid 44066984)
14. DiPaola M., Rozbruch SR, Helfet DL Minimal incision technique using a two-hole plate for fixation of stable intertrochanteric hip fractures. Orthopedics. 2004 ; 27: 270-274. (Pubitemid 38401157)
15. Mahmood A., Zafar MS, Majid I., Maffulli N., Thompson J. Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: a quantitative review of the literature. Br Med Bull. 2007 ; 84: 37-48.
16. Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N., Cook JL, Wark JD Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2000 ; 10: 2-11.
17. Higgins JP, Thompson SG Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002 ; 21: 1539-1558. (Pubitemid 34746062)
18. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003 ; 327: 557-560. (Pubitemid 37088507)
19. Jiang SD, Jiang LS, Zhao CQ, Dai LY No advantages of Gamma nail over sliding hip screw in the management of peritrochanteric hip fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Disabil Rehabil. 2008 ; 30: 493-497.
20. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 ; 348: 87-94. (Pubitemid 28160809)
21. Saarenpää I., Heikkinen T., Ristiniemi J., Hyvönen P., Leppilahti J., Jalovaara P. Functional comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the Gamma locking nail in trochanteric hip fractures: a matched-pair study of 268 patients. Int Orthop. 2009 ; 33: 255-260.
22. Parker MJ, Handoll HH Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 ;(16). CD000093.
23. Peyser A., Weil Y., Brocke L., Manor O., Mosheiff R., Liebergall M. Percutaneous compression plating versus compression hip screw fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Injury. 2005 ; 36: 1343-1349. (Pubitemid 41427215)
24. Hsueh KK, Fang CK, Chen CM, Su YP, Wu HF, Chiu FY Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: an evaluation of 937 patients. Int Orthop. 2010 ; 34: 1273-1276.
25. Güven M., Yavuz U., Kadioǧlu B., et al. Importance of screw position in intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated by dynamic hip screw. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010 ; 96: 21-27.
26. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 ; 77: 1058-1064.
27. Herman A., Dekel A., Botser IB, Steinberg EL Computer-assisted surgery for dynamic hip screw, using Surgix, a novel intraoperative guiding system. Int J Med Robot. 2009 ; 5: 45-50.
28. Yian EH, Banerji I., Matthews LS Optimal side plate fixation for unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1997 ; 11: 254-259. (Pubitemid 127453372)
29. Egol KA, Koval KJ Hip: trauma. In: Koval KJ, ed. Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 7. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons ; 2002: 407-416.
30. McLoughlin SW, Wheeler DL, Rider J., Bolhofner B. Biomechanical evaluation of the dynamic hip screw with two- and four-hole side plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2000 ; 14: 318-323.
31. Laohapoonrungsee A., Arpornchayanon O., Phornputkul C. Two-hole side-plate DHS in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture: results and complications. Injury. 2005 ; 36: 1355-1360. (Pubitemid 41427217)
32. Bolhofner BR, Russo PR, Carmen B. Results of intertrochanteric femur fractures treated with a 135-degree sliding screw with a two-hole side plate. J Orthop Trauma. 1999 ; 13: 5-8. (Pubitemid 128701894)
33. Carr AJ Evidence-based orthopaedic surgery: what type of research will best improve clinical practice ? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 ; 87: 1593-1594. (Pubitemid 43009721)
34. Cowan J., Lozano-Calderón S., Ring D. Quality of prospective controlled randomized trials: analysis of trials of treatment for lateral epicondylitis as an example. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 ; 89: 1693-1699. (Pubitemid 47229874)