Computer-assisted surgery for dynamic hip screw, using surgix©, a novel intraoperative guiding system

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 45-50

  Herman, Amir ^a,d   Dekel, Assaf ^b,d   Botser, Itamar B ^a,d   Steinberg, Ely L ^c,d  

^a SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b Edith Wolfson Medical Centre   (Israel)

^c TEL AVIV SOURASKY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^d TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Dynamic hip screw; Guide wire insertion

Indexed keywords

FLUORESCENT SCREENS; SCREWS; SURGERY;

COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY SYSTEMS; DYNAMIC HIP SCREW; GUIDE WIRE INSERTION; GUIDEWIRES; GUIDING SYSTEMS; IMAGE-ANALYSIS; INTRA-OPERATIVE; SYSTEM USE; TIP APEX;

WIRE;

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; FEMUR SHAFT; FLUOROSCOPY; GUIDE WIRE; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMUR FRACTURE; HIP FRACTURE; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERNAL FIXATOR; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE SCREWS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FLUOROSCOPY; FRACTURE FIXATION, INTERNAL; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTERNAL FIXATORS; MALE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 65349149092     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.231     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Suhm N, Messmer P, Zuna I, et al. Fluoroscopic guidance versus surgical navigation for distal locking of intramedullary implants. A prospective, controlled clinical study. Injury 2004; 35: 567-574.
2. Liebergall M, Ben-David D, Weil Y, et al. Computerized navigation for the internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1748-1754.
3. Chong KW, Wong MK, Rikhraj IS, et al. The use of computer navigation in performing minimally invasive surgery for intertrochanteric hip fractures - the experience in Singapore. Injury 2006; 37: 755-762.
4. Cummings SR, Rubin SM, Black D. The future of hip fractures in the United States. Numbers, costs, and potential effects of postmenopausal estrogen. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1990; 252: 163-166.
5. Rogers FB, Shackford SR, Keller MS. Early fixation reduces morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with hip fractures from low impact falls. J Trauma 1995; 39: 261-265.
6. White BL, Fisher WD, Laurin CA. Rate of mortality for elderly patients after fracture of the hip in the 1980s. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 1987; 69: 1335-1340.
7. Evans JG, Wandless I. A prospective study of fractured proximal femur: factors predisposing to survival. Age Aging 1979; 8: 246-250.
8. Ahrengart L, Törnkvist H, Fornander P, et al. A randomized study of the compression hip screw and Gamma nail in 426 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 401: 209-222.
9. Leung KS, So WS, Shen WY, et al. Gamma nails and dynamic hip screws for peritrochanteric fractures: a randomised prospective study in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992; 74: 345-351.
10. Hardy DC, Descamps PY, Krallis P, et al. Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hip-screw with a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. A prospective, randomized study of one hundred patients. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 1998; 80: 618-630.
11. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, et al. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 1058-1064.
12. Koval K. Pertrochanteric fractures surgical technique. In Rockwood and Green Fracture Management, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD (eds). Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, 2006.
13. Verhofstad MH, van der Werken C. DHS osteosynthesis for stable pertrochanteric femur fractures with a two-hole side plate. Injury 2004; 35: 999-1002.
14. Kendoff D, Kfuri M, Geerling J, et al. Conventional versus navigated technique - an experimental study. Scientific Poster, Orthopedic Trauma association Meeting, Hollywood, FL, USA, 2004.