Principals' perceptions of barriers to teacher dismissal

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 253-264

  Painter, Suzanne R ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY WEST   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750597634     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008144215978     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Blackman, M.C., & Fenwick, L.T. (2000). The Principalship: Looking for Leaders in a Time of Change. Education Week 19(29), 68, 46.
2. Bridges, E.M. (1992). The Incompetent Teacher: Managerial Responses. Bristol, PA: Palmer Press.
3. Chase, R.F. (1997). National Press Club, http://www.nea.org/newunion/.
4. DeMitchell, TA., & Fossey, R. (1997). The Limits of Law-Based School Reform: Vain Hopes and False Promises. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
5. Ellett, C.D. (1987). Emerging Teacher Performance Assessment Practices: Implications for the Instructional Supervision Role of the School Principal. In W. Greenfield (Ed.), Instructional leadership: Concepts, Issues and Controversies, (pp. 302-327). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
6. Ellett, C.D., & Garland, J. (1987). Teacher Evaluation Practices in our 100 Largest School Districts: Are They Living up to "State-of-the-Art" Systems? Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(1), 69-92.
7. Hunter, M. (1988). Effecting a Reconciliation Between Supervision and Evaluation: A Reply to Popham. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(3), 275-280.
8. Lavely, C., Berger, N., & Follman, J. (1992). Actual Incidence of Incompetent Teachers. Educational Research Quarterly, 15(2), 11-14.
9. Lieberman, M. (1998). Teachers Evaluating Teachers: Peer Review and The New Unionism. New Brunswick: Social Philosophy and Policy Center.
10. Leithwood, K.A., Begley, P.T., & Cousins, J.B. (1990). The Nature, Causes and Consequences of Principals' Practices: An Agenda for Future Research. Journal of Educational Administration, 28(4), 5-31.
11. Loup, K.S., Garland, J.S., Ellett, C.D., & Rugutt, J.K. (1996). Ten Years Later: Findings from a Replication of a Study of Teacher Evaluation Practices in our 100 Largest School Districts. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10(3), 203-226.
12. Painter, S.R. (1999). Principals' Efficacy Beliefs about Teacher Evaluation, to be published 2000, in Journal of Educational Administration.
13. Popham, J. (1988). The Dysfunctional Marriage of Formative and Summative Teacher Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(3), 269-280.
14. Poston, W.K., & Manatt, R.P. (1993). Principals as Evaluators: Limiting Effects on School Reform. International Journal of Educational Reform, 2(1), 41-48.
15. Schweitzer, P. (1998). Firing offenses. National Review, 50(15), 27-29.
16. Toch, T. (1996, February 26). Why Teachers Don't Teach. US. News and World Report, 120(8), 62-71.
17. Tucker, P.D. (1997). Lake Woebegon: Where all Teachers are Competent (or, Have we Come to Terms with the Problem of Incompetent Teachers?). Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11(2), 103-126.
18. Turner, D.W., & Wilson, R.E. (1998). The Promise of a New Day: Senate Bill 880 and its Impact on Teacher and Administrator Employment and Accountability. Willamette Law Review, 38, 269-325.
19. Wise, A.E., Darling-Hammond, L., McLaughlin, M.W., & Bernstein, H.E. (1984). Teacher Evaluation: A Study of Effective Practices, Santa Monica, CA: Rand.