Partnered field placements: Collaboration in the "real world"

Teacher Educator

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 202-215

  Gardiner, Wendy ^a   Robinson, Karen Shipley ^b  

^a NATIONAL LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OTTERBEIN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959720730     PISSN: 08878730     EISSN: 19388101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08878730.2010.487928     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Baker, S., & Milner, J. (2006). Complexities of collaboration: Intensity of mentors' responses to paired and single student teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 28(3), 61-72.
2. Bullough, R. V., Young, J., Erickson, L., Birrell, J. R., Clark, D. C., & Egan, M. W. (2002). Rethinking field experience: Partnership teaching versus singleplacement teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 68-80.
3. Bullough, R. V., Young, J., Erickson, L., Birrell, J. R., Clark, D. C., & Egan, M. W. (2003). Teaching with a peer: A comparison of two models of student teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 57-73.
4. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314.
6. Gardiner, W., & Robinson, K. (2009). Paired field placements for preservice teachers: A means for collaboration. The New Educator, 5(1), 81-94.
7. Glazer, E. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2006). The collaborative apprenticeship model: Situated professional development within school settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 179-193.
8. Grossman, P., Weinberg, S., &Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942-1012.
9. Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358-389). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Rogers, A., & Rogers, E. (2007). The effective literacy coach: Using inquiry to support teaching and learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Seidman, I. E. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Shulman, L., & Shulman, J. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257-271.
17. Smith, J. D. (2002). The development of tandem teaching placements. Mentoring and Tutoring, 10(3), 253-274.
18. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher sociological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.