Characteristics of head-mounted displays and their effects on simulator sickness

Human Factors

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 308-319

  Moss, Jason D ^a   Muth, Eric R ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

delay; field of view; image scale factor; peripheral vision; simulator sickness; virtual environments

Indexed keywords

DELAY; FIELD OF VIEWS; IMAGE SCALE; PERIPHERAL VISION; SIMULATOR SICKNESS; VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS;

DISEASES; SIMULATORS; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISION;

HELMET MOUNTED DISPLAYS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MOTION SICKNESS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA DISPLAY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION SICKNESS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959701812     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: 15478181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018720811405196     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Allison R. S., Harris L. R., Jenkin M., Jasiobedzka U., Zacher J. E. Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality 2001. New York, NY: IEEE ; 2001: 247-254.
2. Bos J. E., de Vries S. C., van Emmerik M. L., Groen E. L. The effect of internal and external fields of view on visually induced motion sickness. Applied Ergonomics. 2010 ; 41: 516-521
3. Bosser G., Caillet G., Gauchard G., Marcon F., Perrin P. Relation between motion sickness susceptibility and vasovagal syncope susceptibility. Brain Research Bulletin. 2006 ; 68: 217-226 (Pubitemid 41827725)
4. Bouyer L. J. G., Watt D. G. D. "Torso rotation" experiments: 1. Adaptation to motion sickness does not correlate with changes in VOR gain. Journal of Vestibular Research. 1996 ; 6: 367-375 (Pubitemid 26344369)
5. DiZio P., Lackner J. R. Advances in human factors/ergonomics: Vol. 21b. Design of computing systems: Social and ergonomic considerations. Salvendy G. Smith M. J. Salvendy G. Koubek R. J., ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier ; 1997: 893-896.
6. Draper M. H., Viirre E. S., Furness T. A., Gawron V. J. Effects of image scale and system time delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Human Factors. 2001 ; 43: 129-146 (Pubitemid 32656538)
7. Hendrix C., Barfield W. Presence within virtual environments as a function of visual display parameters. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 1996 ; 5: 274-289
8. Jeka J. J., Lackner J. R. The role of haptic cues from rough and slippery surfaces on human postural control. Experimental Brain Research. 1995 ; 103: 267-276
9. Jennings S., Reid L. D., Craig G., Kruk R. V. Time delays in visually coupled systems during flight test and simulation. Journal of Aircraft. 2004 ; 41: 1327-1335 (Pubitemid 40011327)
10. Kennedy R. S., Hettinger L. J., Lilienthal M. G. Motion and space sickness. Crampton G. H., ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press ; 1990: 317-341.
11. Kennedy R. S., Lane N. E., Berbaum K. S., Lilienthal M. G. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: A new method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 1993 ; 3: 203-220
12. Kennedy R. S., Lilienthal M. G., Berbaum K. S., Baltzley D. R., McCauley M. E. Simulator sickness in U.S. navy flight simulators. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. 1989 ; 60: 10-16 (Pubitemid 19039478)
13. Kennedy R. S., Stanney K. M., Dunlap W. P. Duration and exposure to virtual environments: Sickness curves during and across sessions. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 2000 ; 9: 463-472
14. Lestienne F., Soechting J., Berthoz A. Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes. Experimental Brain Research. 1977 ; 28: 363-384 (Pubitemid 8113158)
15. Lin J. W., Duh B. L., Abi-Rached H., Parker D. E., Furness T. A. Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality 2002. New York, NY: IEEE ; 2002: 164-171.
16. Mania K., Adelstein B. D., Ellis S. R., Hill M. I. Proceedings of ACM Siggraph Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery ; 2004: 39-47.
17. MorphewM. E.ShivelyR. J.CaseyD. (2004, April). Helmet mounted displays for unmanned aerial vehicle control. Paper presented at the conference of the International Society for Optical Engineering, Orlando, FL. Retrieved from http://caffeine.arc.nasa.gov/hsi/publications/HMD-SPIE-Paper-0404.pdf
18. Moss J. D., Muth E. R., Tyrrell R. A., Stephens B. R. Perceptual thresholds for display lag in a real visual environment are not affected by field of view or psychophysical technique. Displays. 2010 ; 31: 143-149
19. Moss J. D., Scisco J. L., Muth E. R. Proceeding of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 52nd Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ; 2008: 1631-1634.
20. Nelson T. W., Roe M. M., Bolia R. S., Morley R. M. Assessing simulator sickness in a see-through HMD: Effects of time delay, time on task, and task complexity. Paper presented at the IMAGE 2000 Conference ; Scottsdale, AR ;.
21. Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner M. H. Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs. 3 rd ed. Boston, MA: Irwin ; 1990 :
22. Pausch R., Crea T., Conway M. A literature survey for virtual environments: Military flight simulator visual systems and simulator sickness. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 1992 ; 1: 344-363
23. Rabin E., DiZio P., Lackner J. R. Time course of haptic stabilization of posture. Experimental Brain Research. 2006 ; 170: 122-126 (Pubitemid 43363606)
24. Reason J. T., Brand J. J. Motion sickness. London, UK: Academic ; 1975 :
25. Regan E. C., Price K. R. The frequency of occurrence and severity of side-effects of immersion virtual reality. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. 1994 ; 65: 527-530 (Pubitemid 24161834)
26. Riccio G. E., Stoffregen T. A. An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability. Ecological Psychology. 1991 ; 3: 195-240
27. Ruddle R. A., Payne S. J., Jones D. M. Navigating large-scale virtual environments: What differences occur between helmet-mounted and desk-top displays?. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 1999 ; 8: 157-168
28. Seay A. F., Krum D. M., Hodges L., Ribarsky W. Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality 2001. New York, NY: IEEE ; 2001: 299-300.
29. Sharples S., Cobb S., Moody A., Wilson J. R. Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): Comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems. Displays. 2008 ; 29: 58-69 (Pubitemid 350266826)
30. Slater M., Wilbur S. A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 1997 ; 6: 603-616
31. Smart L. J., Pagulayan R. J., Stoffregen T. A. Self-induced motion sickness in unperturbed stance. Brain Research Bulletin. 1998 ; 47: 449-457 (Pubitemid 29095352)
32. So R. H. Y.. Paper presented at the United Kingdom Informal Group Meeting on Human Response to Vibration ; Alverstoke, UK ;.
33. Toet A., Jansen S. E. M., Delleman N. J. Effects of field-of-view restrictions on speed and accuracy of manoeuvring. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2007 ; 105: 1245-1256
34. Wilson J. R. Effects of participating in virtual environments: A review of current knowledge. Safety Science. 1996 ; 23: 39-51 (Pubitemid 26298442)
35. Witmer B., Singer M. J. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 1998 ; 7: 225-240