The effect of internal and external fields of view on visually induced motion sickness

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 516-521

  Bos, Jelte E ^a   de Vries, Sjoerd C ^a   van Emmerik, Martijn L ^a   Groen, Eric L ^a  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cybersickness; Field of view; Internal model

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GAMES;

CYBERSICKNESS; EXTERNAL FACTORS; EXTERNAL FIELDS; FIELD OF VIEWS; GAME ENVIRONMENT; INTERNAL MODELING; OBSERVER MODELS; VIEWING DISTANCE;

DISEASES;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; DIZZINESS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; MOTION SICKNESS; NAUSEA; QUESTIONNAIRE; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; UNIVERSITY STUDENT; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM; VOMITING; WELLBEING;

EID: 77950370563     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bles W., Bos J.E., De Graaf B., Groen E., Wertheim A.H. Motion sickness: only one provocative conflict?. Brain Res. Bull. 1998, 47:481-487.
2. Bos J.E., Bles W. Modelling motion sickness and subjective vertical mismatch detailed for vertical motions. Brain Res. Bull. 1998, 47:537-542.
3. Bos J.E., Bles W. Theoretical considerations on canal-otolith interaction and an observer model. Biol. Cybern. 2002, 86:191-207.
4. Bos J.E., MacKinnon S.N., Patterson A. Motion sickness symptoms in a ship motion simulator: effects of inside, outside, and no view. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 2005, 76:1111-1118.
5. Bos J.E., Bles W., Groen E.L. A theory on visually induced motion sickness. Displays 2008, 29:47-57.
6. Carpenter R.H.S. Movements of the Eyes 1988, Pion, London, p. 76. second ed.
7. Cheung B.S.K., Howard I.P., Money K.E. Visually-induced sickness in normal and bilaterally labyrinthine-defective subjects. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 1991, 62:527-531.
8. Draper M.H., Viirre E.S., Furness T.A., Gawron V.J. Effects of image scale and system time delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Human Factors 2001, 43:129-146.
9. Duh, H.B.L., Lin, J.J.W., Kenyon, R.V., Parker, D.E., Furness, T.A., 2001. Effects of field of view on balance in an immersive environment. In: Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality Conf., pp. 235-240.
10. Golding J.F. Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire revised and its relationship to other forms of sickness - facilitation of the emetic response to poisons. Brain Res. Bull. 1998, 47:507-516.
11. Golding J.F., Stott J.R.R. Effect of sickness severity on habituation to repeated motion challenges in aircrew referred for airsickness treatment. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 1995, 66:625-630.
12. Golding J.F., Stott J.R.R. Objective and subjective time courses of recovery from motion sickness assessed by repeated motion challenges. J. Vest. Res. 1997, 7:421-428.
13. Golding J.F., Arun S., Wortley E., Wotton-Hamrioui K., Cousins S., Gresty M.A. Off-vertical axis rotation of the visual field and nauseogenicity. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 2009, 80:516-521.
14. Irwin J.A. The pathology of seasickness. The Lancet 1881, 2:907-909.
15. Johnson W.H., Sunahara F.A., Landolt J.P. Importance of the vestibular system in visually induced nausea and self-vection. J. Vestibular Res. 1999, 9:83-87.
16. Kennedy R.S., Lilienthal M.G., Berbaum K.S., Baltzley D.R., McCauley M.E. Simulator sickness in 10 U.S. Navy flight simulators. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 1989, 60:10-16.
17. Kennedy, R.S., Berbaum, K.S., Drexler, J., 1994. Methodological and measurement issues for identification of engineering features contributing to virtual reality sickness. In: Image VII Conference, Tucson, AZ.
18. Kolasinski G. Simulator Sickness in Virtual Environments (Technical Report 1027) 1995, United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Orlando.
19. Lin, J.J.W., Duh, H.B.L., Parker, D.E., Abi-Rached, H., Furness, T.A., 2002. Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. In: Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality Conf., pp. 164-171.
20. Money K.E. Motion sickness. Physiol. Rev. 1970, 50:1-39.
21. Oman C.M. A heuristic mathematical model for the dynamics of sensory conflict and motion sickness. Acta Otolaryngol. 1982, Suppl. 392:1-44.
22. Reason J.T., Brand J.J. Motion Sickness 1975, Academic Press, New York.
23. Reed, N., Diels, C., Parkes, A.M., 2007. Simulator sickness management: enhanced familiarisation and screening processes. In: Proc. 1st Int. Symp. Visually Induced Motion Sickness (VIMS2007), Hong Kong, 10-11 December 2007, pp. 156-162.
24. Rolnick A., Lubow R.E. Why is the driver rarely motion sick? The role of controllability in motion sickness. Ergonomics 1991, 34:867-879.
25. Stanney K.M., Mourant R.R., Kennedy R.S. Human factors issues in virtual environments: a review of the literature. Presence 1998, 7:327-351.
26. Stern R.M., Hu S., Vasey M.W., Koch K.L. Adaptation to vection-induced symptoms of motion sickness. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 1989, 60:566-572.
27. Tabak S., Collewijn H., Boumans L.J.J.M., Van der Steen J. Gain and delay of human vestibulo-ocular reflexes to oscillation and steps of the head by a reactive torque helmet. 1. Normal subjects. Acta Otolaryngol. 1997, 117:785-795.
28. Van der Spek, E.D., Bos, J.E., Van Emmerik, M.L., Toet, A., Houtkamp, J., 2007. Cybersickness affects the affective appraisal of a virtual environment. In: Proc. 1st Int. Symp. Visually Induced Motion Sickness (VIMS2007), Hong Kong, 10-11 December 2007, pp. 170-177.
29. Wertheim A.H., Bos J.E., Krul A.J. Predicting Motion Induced Vomiting from Subjective Misery (MISC) Ratings Obtained in 12 Experimental Studies 2001, Report TNO-TM-01-A066, TNO Human Factors Research Institute, Soesterberg, NL.