Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): Comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems

Displays

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 58-69

  Sharples, Sarah ^a   Cobb, Sue ^a   Moody, Amanda ^a   Wilson, John R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Display technologies; Sickness; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

HELMET MOUNTED DISPLAYS; PROJECTION SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES; SICKNESS;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 37249078299     PISSN: 01419382     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2007.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Averill J.R. Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. Psychological Bulletin 80 (1973) 286-303
2. Benfari R.C. Perceptual vertigo: a dimensional study. Perceptual and Motor Skills 18 (1964) 633-639
3. Burns D.H. Characteristics of visual display units that may cause visual difficulties. Opthalmic and Physiological Optics 15 2 (1995) 99-104
4. S. Cobb, S. Nichols, A. Ramsey, J.R. Wilson, Health and safety implications of virtual reality: results and conclusions from an experimental programme, in: Proceedings of FIVE'96, Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments, Italy, 21st December, 1996, pp. 158-166.
5. S.V.G. Cobb, D.J. Brown, Promotion of Health and Safety at Work using a Virtual Factory, in: Proceedings of Virtual Reality in Education and Training, VRET'97, 1997.
6. Cobb S.V.G., Nichols S.C., Ramsey A.R., and Wilson J.R. Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 8 2 (1999) 169-186
7. Deisinger J., Cruz-Neira C., Riedel O., and Symanzik J. The effect of different viewing devices for the sense of presence and immersion in virtual environments: a comparison of stereoprojections based on monitors, HMDs and screen. In: Smith M., Salvendy G., and Koubek R. (Eds). Design of Computing Systems: Social and Ergonomic Considerations (1997), Elsevier Science Publications, Amsterdam
8. Dillon T.W., and Emurian H.H. Some factors affecting reports of visual fatigue resulting from use of a VDU. Computers in Human Behaviour 12 1 (1996) 49-59
9. Duh H.B.-L., Lin J.J.W., Kenyon R.V., Parker D.E., and Furness T.A. Effects of characteristics of image quality in an immersive environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11 3 (2002) 324-332
10. Duh H.B.-L., Parker D.E., and Furness T.A. An independent visual background reduced simulator sickness in a driving simulator. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13 5 (2004) 578-588
11. Garris-Reif R., and Franz T.M. Simulator sickness and human task performance in conventional and virtual environments. In: Bittner A.C., and Champney P.C. (Eds). Advances in Industrial Ergonomics and Safety VII (1995), Taylor & Francis
12. Hash P.A.K., and Stanney K.M. Control: a primary driver of cybersickness. In: Bittner A.C., and Champney P.C. (Eds). Advances in Industrial Ergonomics and Safety VII (1995), Taylor & Francis, London
13. Hill K., and Howarth P.A. Habituation to the side effects of immersion in a virtual environment. Displays 21 1 (2000) 25-30
14. P.A. Howarth, The multi-factorial visual causes of virtual simulation sickness, VISERG Report, 1997.
15. Ijseelsteijn W., de Ridder H., Freeman J., Avons S.E., and Bouwhuis D. Effects of stereoscopic presentation, image motion and screen size on subjective and objective corroborative measures of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10 3 (2001) 298-311
16. Kennedy R.S., Lane M.E., Lilienthal M.G., Berbaum K.S., and Hettinger L.J. Profile analysis of simulator sickness symptoms: application to virtual environment systems. Presence 1 3 (1992) 295-301
17. Kennedy R.S., Lane N.E., Berbaum K.S., and Lilienthal M.G. Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3 3 (1993) 203-220
18. R.S. Kennedy, C.J. Massey, M.G. Lilienthal, Incidences of fatigue and drowsiness reports from three dozen simulators: relevance for the sopite syndrome, in: Presented at the First Workshop on Simulation and interaction in Virtual Environments (SIVE '95), July 13-15, 1995, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 1995.
19. Kennedy RS., Lilienthal MG., Berbaum KS., Baltzley D.R., and McCauley M.E. Simulator sickness in US navy flight simulators. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine 60 (1989) 10-16
20. D.R. Kolasinski Lampton, E.M. Knerr, B.W. Bliss, J.H. Bailey, B.G. Witmer, Side effects and aftereffects of immersion in virtual environments, in: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, 1994, pp. 1154-1157.
21. Miller J.W., and Goodson J.E. Motion sickness in a helicopter simulator. Aerospace Medicine 31 (1960) 204-212
22. Mon-Williams M., Wann J.P., and Rushton S. Design factors in stereoscopic virtual-reality displays. Journal of the SID 3 4 (1995) 207-210
23. Mon-Williams M., Wann J.P., and Rushton S. Binocular vision in a virtual world: visual deficits following the wearing of a head-mounted display. Opthalmic and Physiological Optics 13 (1993) 387-391
24. Nichols S. Physical ergonomics issues for virtual environment use. Applied Ergonomics 30 (1999) 79-90
25. S. Nichols, A.D. Ramsey, S. Cobb, H. Neale, M. D'Cruz, J.R. Wilson, Incidence of virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE) in desktop and projection screen display systems, HSE report 274/2000, 2000.
26. Nichols S.C., Cobb S.V.G., and Wilson J.R. Health and safety implications of virtual environments: measurement issues. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6 6 (1997) 667-675
27. Peli E. The visual effects of head-mounted display (HMD) are not distinguishable from those of desk-top computer display. Vision Research 38 (1998) 2053-2066
28. A.D. Ramsey, Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): a psycho-physiological perspective, Ph.D thesis, University of Nottingham, 1999.
29. Reason J.T., and Brand J.J. Motion Sickness (1975), Academic Press, London
30. Regan E.C., and Price K.R. The frequency of occurrence and severity of side-effects of immersion virtual reality. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine 65 6 (1994) 527-530
31. Rolnick A., and Lubow R.E. Why is the driver rarely motion sick? The role of controllability in motion sickness. Ergonomics 34 7 (1991) 867-879
32. Ruddle R.A., Savage J.C.D., and Jones D.M. Levels of control during a collaborative carrying task. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12 2 (2003) 140-155
33. So R.H.Y., Ho A.T.K., and Lo W.T. A metric to quantify virtual scene movement for the study of cybersickness: definition, implementation and verification. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10 2 (2001) 193-215
34. Stammerjohn L.W., Smith M.J., and Cohen B.G.F. Evaluation of workstation design factors in VDT operators. Human Factors 23 4 (1981) 410-412
35. Stanney K.M., and Hash P.A.K. Locus of user-initiated control in virtual environments: influences on cybersickness. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7 5 (1998) 447-459
36. Stanney K.M., Kennedy R.S., and Drexler J.M. Cybersickness is not simulator sickness. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting (1997) 1138-1142
37. Taptagaporn S., and Saito S. How display polarity and lighting conditions affect the pupil size of VDT operators. Ergonomics 33 2 (1990) 201-208
38. Thompson S.C. Will it hurt less if I can control it - a complex answer to a simple question. Psychological Bulletin 90 1 (1981) 89-101
39. Wilson J.R., Nichols S., and Ramsey A. Virtual reality health and safety: facts, speculation and myths. VR News 4 9 (1995) 20-24