Application of response surface methodology for the determination of optimum reaction conditions (Temperature and pH) for starch hydrolysis by α-amylase

Asian Journal of Biochemistry

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 357-365

  Jaiswal, Nivedita ^a   Prakash, Om ^a   Talat, Mahe ^a   Hasan, S H ^b   Pandey, Rajesh Kumar ^a  

^a BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Hydrolysis; Optimum reaction conditions; pH; Starch; Temperature

Indexed keywords

GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 79959609593     PISSN: 18159923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/ajb.2011.357.365     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ahmad, A., F.M. Anjum, T. Zahoor and H. Nawaz, 2009. Extraction of 0-glucan from oat and its interaction with glucose and lipoprotein profile. Pak. J. Nutr., 8: 1486-1492.1
2. Ahuja, S.K., G.M. Ferreira and A.R. Morreira, 2004. Application of Plackett and Burman design and response surface methodology to achieve exponential growth of aggregated shipwormbacterium. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 85: 666-675.1
3. Ai-Noi, S., A.A. Surami, A. Norjahan, H. Osman and K.M.I. Abdul, 2008. Optimization of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase production by response surface methodology approach. Biotechnology, 7: 10-18.1
4. Baskar, G., C. Muthukumaran and S. Renganathan, 2008. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of Manihot esculenta root starch by immobilized and alpha,-amylase using response surface methodology. Int. J. Chem. Biol. Eng., 1: 155-159.1
5. Bernfeld, P., 1955. Amylase a andb. In: Methods in Enzymology, Colowick, S.P. and N.O. Kaplan (Eds.). Academic Press, New York, pp: 149-152.1
6. Claver, LP., H. Zhang, Q. Li, Z. Kexue and H. Zhou, 2010. Optimization of ultrasonic extraction of polysaccharides from Chinese malted sorghum using response surface methodology. Pak. J. Nutr, 9: 336-342.1
7. Coronado, M., C. Vargas, J. Hofemeister, A. Ventosa and J.J. Nieto, 2000. Production and biochemical characterization of an a-amylase from the moderate halophile Halomonas meridiana. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 183: 67-71.1
8. Dey, G., A. Mitra, R. Banerjee and B.R. Maiti, 2001. Enhanced production of amylase by optimization of nutritional constituents using response surface methodology. Biochem. Eng. J, 7: 227-231.1
9. Francis, F., A. Sabu, K.M. Nampoothiri, G. Szakacs and A. Pandey, 2002. Synthesis of a-amylase by Aspergillus oryzae in solid-state fermentation. J. Basic Microbiol., 42: 320-326.1
10. Gangadharan, D., S. Sivaramakrishnan, K.M. Nampoothiri, R.K. Sukumaran and A. Bandey, 2008. Response surface methodology for the optimization of a amylase production by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Bioresour. Technol., 99: 4597-4602.1
11. Hamilton, L.M., C.T. Kelly and W.M. Fogarty, 1999. Furification and properties of the raw starch degrading a-amylase of Bacillus sp. IMD 434. Biotechol. Lett., 21: 111-115.1
12. Ibrahim, H.M. and E.E. Elkhidir, 2011. Response surface method as an efficient tool for medium optimisation. Trends Applied Sci. Res., 6: 121-129.1
13. Khoo, S.L., A.A. Amirul, M. Kamaruzaman, N. Nazalan and M.N. Azizan, 1994. Burification and characterization of a-amylase from Aspergillus flavus. Folia Microbiol., 39: 392-398.1
14. Kunamneni, A. and S. Singh, 2005. Response surface optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of maize starch for higher glucose production. Biochem. Eng. J., 27: 179-190.1
15. Kunamneni, A., K.S. Kumar and S. Singh, 2005. Response surface methodological approach to optimize the nutritional parameters for enhanced production of a-amylase in solid state fermentation by Thermomyces lanuginosus. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 4: 708-716.1
16. Lee, H., M. Song and S. Hwang, 2003. Optimizing bioconversion of deproteinated cheese whey to mycelia of Ganoderma lucidum. Brocess Biochem., 38: 1685-1693.1
17. Lowry, O.H., N.J. Rosebrough, A.L. Farr and R.J. Randall, 1951. Frotein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem., 193: 265-275.1
18. Omar, K.A., L. Shan, X. Zou, Z. Song and X. Wang, 2009. Effects of two emulsifiers on yield and storage of flaxseed oil powder by response surface methodology. Bak. J. Nutr., 8: 1316-1324.1
19. Brakash, O. and N. Jaiswal, 2010. A highly efficient and thermostable a-amylase from soybean seeds. Biotechnol. Applied Biochem., 57: 105-110.1
20. Ranjan, D., M. Talat and S.H. Hasan, 2009. Biosorption of arsenic from aqueous solution using agricultural residue rice polish. J. Hazard. Mat., 166: 1050-1059.1
21. Rao, J.L.U.M. and T. Satyanarayana, 2007. Improving production of hyperthermostable and high maltose-forming and alpha,-amylase by an extreme thermophile Geobacillus thermoleovorans using response surface methodology and its applications. Bioresour. Technol., 98: 345-352.1
22. Ravikumar, K, S. Krishnan, S. Ramalingam and K. Balu, 2007. Optimization of process variables by the application of response surface methodology for dye removal using novel adsorbent. Dyes Bigments, 72: 66-74.1
23. Schepers, A.W., J. Thibault and C. Lacroix, 2003. Lactobacillus helveticus growth and lactic acid production during pH-controlled batch cultures in whey permeate/yeast extract medium. Bart I. Multiple factor kinetic analysis. Enzyme Microbial Technol., 30: 176-186.1
24. Silva, C.J.S.M., G. Gubitz and A. Cavaco-Baulo, 2006. Optimisation of a serine protease coupling to Eudragit S-100 by experimental design techniques. J. Chem. Technol. Biotech., 81: 8-16.1
25. Song, J, H. Xie, W. Wu, V.R. Joseph, C.F.J. Wu and Z.L. Wang, 2010. Robust optimization of the output voltage of nanogenerators by statistical design of experiments. Nano Res, 3: 613-619.1
26. Thoma, J.A, J.E. Sparlin and S. Dygert, 1971. Plant and Animal Amylases. In: The Enzymes, Boyer, P. (Ed.). Vol. 7, Academic Press, New York, pp: 115-189.1
27. Van der Maarel, M.J.E.C, B. Van der Veen, J.CM. Uitdehaag, H. Leemhuis and L. Dijkhuizen, 2002. Properties and applications of starch converting enzymes of the alpha amylase family. J. Biotechnol, 94: 137-155.1
28. Zulkali, M.M.D, A.L. Ahmad and N.H. Norulakmal, 2006. Oryza saliva L. husk as heavy metal adsorbent: Optimization with lead as model solution. Bioresour. Technol, 97: 21-25.