Doing critical information systems research-arguments for a critical research methodology

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 440-455

  Cecez Kecmanovic, Dubravka ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

critical concerns in information systems; critical IS research; critical research methodology; IS research paradigms

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ACTION RESEARCH; CRITICAL ETHNOGRAPHY; CRITICAL RESEARCHES; FIELD STUDIES; INTERPRETIVIST; IS RESEARCHES; KEY DIMENSIONS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING;

INFORMATION USE;

EID: 79959567014     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2010.67     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. ADAM A, GRIFFITHS M, CLAIRE KC, KARENZA MK, RICHARDSON H and TATTERSALL A (2006) Being an 'it' in IT: gendered identities in IT work. European Journal of Information Systems 15, 368-378. (Pubitemid 44494845)
2. ALVAREZ R (2005) Taking a critical linguistic turn: using critical discourse analysis for the study of information systems. In Handbook of Information Systems Research: Critical Perspectives on Information Systems Design, Implementation and Use (Howcroft D and Trauth EM, Eds), pp 104-122, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, U. K.
3. ALVAREZ R (2008) Examining technology, structure and identity during an enterprise system implementation. Journal of Information Systems 18, 203-224.
4. ALVESSON M and ASCHROFT KL (2009) Critical methodology in management and organization research. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Methods (Buchanan DA and Bryman A, Eds), pp 61-78, SAGE Publishing, London.
5. ALVESSON M, BRIDGMAN T and WILLMOTT H (Eds) (2009) The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U. K.
6. ALVESSON M and DEETZ SA (2000) Doing Critical Management Research. SAGE Publications, London.
7. ALVESSON M and SKOLDBERG K (2000) Reflexive Methodology - New Vistas for Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications, London.
8. ALVESSON M and WILLMOTT H (1992) On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review 17(3), 432-464.
9. AVGEROU C (2002) Information Systems and Global Diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U. K.
10. BEARDSLEY PL (1980) Redefining Rigor: Ideology and Statistics in Political Inquiry. SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
11. BOHMAN J (2009) Critical theory, Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, fall 2009 edition. [WWW document] http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/ entries/critical-theory/ (accessed 15 November 2009).
12. BRAA J and HEDBERG C (2002) The struggle for district - based health information systems in South Africa. The Information Society 18(2), 113-127.
13. BROCKLESBY J and CUMMINGS S (1996) Foucault plays Habermas: an alternative philosophical underpinning for critical systems thinking. Journal of Operations Research Society 47, 741-754. (Pubitemid 126578632)
14. BROOKE C (Ed) (2009) Critical Management Perspectives on Information Systems. Elsevier Publishers, London.
15. CECEZ-KECMANOVIC D (2001) Doing critical IS research: the question of methodology. In Qualitative Research in Information Systems: Issues and Trends (TRAUTH EM, Ed), pp 142-163, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA.
16. CECEZ-KECMANOVIC D (2005) Basic assumptions of the critical research perspectives in information systems. In Handbook of Information Systems Research: Critical Perspectives on Information Systems Design, Implementation and Use (HOWCROFT D AND TRAUTH E, Eds), pp 19-46, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, U. K.
17. CECEZ-KECMANOVIC D and JANSON M (2009) Participatory and emancipatory information systems development: principles, practices and pitfalls. In Critical Management Perspectives on Information Systems (BROOKE C Ed), pp 69-101, Elsevier Publishers, London.
18. CECEZ-KECMANOVIC D, JANSON M and BROWN A (2002) The rationality framework for a critical study of information systems. Journal of Information Technology 17, 215-227. (Pubitemid 36096564)
19. CECEZ-KECMANOVIC D, KLEIN H and BROOKE C (2008) Exploring the critical agenda in information systems research. Information Systems Journal 18(2), 123-135.
20. CHEN WS and HIRSCHHEIM R (2004) A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001. Information Systems Journal 14(3), 197-235. (Pubitemid 38874715)
21. CORDOBA J-R and MIDGLEY G (2008) Beyond organisational agendas: using boundary critique to facilitate the inclusion of societal concerns in information systems planning. European Journal of Information Systems 17, 125-142.
22. CROTTY M (1998) The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. Allen and Unwin, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
23. CZARNIAWSKA B and SEVON B (2005) Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in the Global Economy. Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen.
24. DOOLIN B (2004) Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system. Information Systems Journal 14(4), 343-362. (Pubitemid 39285229)
25. FAIRCLOUGH N (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman, London, New York.
26. FOUCAULT M (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 (GORDON C, Ed.) Pantheon books, New York.
27. FUCHS M (1993) The reversal of the ethnological perspective: attempts at objectifying one's own cultural horizon. Dumont, Foucault, Bourdieu? Thesis Eleven 34, 104-125.
28. GALTUNG J (1977) Methodology and Ideology: Essays in Methodology Vol. 1. Christian Ejlers, Copenhagen.
29. GEBHARDT E (1978) A critique of methodology: introduction. In The Essential Frankfurt School Reader (ARATO A AND GEBHARDT E, Eds), pp 371-406, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
30. HABERMAS J (1972) Knowledge and Human Interest. Heinemann, London.
31. HABERMAS J (1974) Theory and Practice (VIERTEL J, trans), Beacon Press, Boston, MA.
32. HABERMAS J (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action - Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Vol. I. Boston, MA. Beacon Press.
33. HABERMAS J (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action - A Critique of Functionalist Reason, Vol. II. (MCCARTHY T, trans), Beacon Press, Boston, MA.
34. HABERMAS J (1990) Reconstruction and interpretation in the social sciences. In Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (HABERMAS J, Ed), MIT Press, Mass, Cambridge.
35. HENG M and DE MOOR A (2003) From Habermas' communicative theory to practice on the internet. Information Systems Journal 13(4), 331-352. (Pubitemid 37301409)
36. HIRSCHHEIM RA and KLEIN HK (1994) Realizing emancipatory principles in information systems development: the case for ETHICS. MIS Quarterly 18(1), 83-109.
37. HORKHEIMER M (1982) Critical Theory. Seabury Press, New York.
38. HOWCROFT D and TRAUTH EM (Eds) (2005) Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research: Theory and Application. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, U. K.
39. HOWCROFT D and TRAUTH EM (2008) The implications of the critical agenda on gender and IS research. Information Systems Journal 18, 185-202.
40. JANSON M and CECEZ-KECMANOVIC D (2005) Making sense of eCommerce as social action. Information Technology & People 18(4), 311-342. (Pubitemid 41661296)
41. JONES C (2009) Poststructuralism in critical management studies. In The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies (ALVESSON M, BRIDGAM T AND WILLMOTT H, Eds), Chapter 4, pp 76-98, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U. K.
42. KINCHELOE LJ and MCLAREN P (2000) Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In Handbook of Qualitative Research (DENZIN NK AND LINKOLN YD, Eds), 2nd edn, pp 279-313, SAGE publications, London.
43. KLECUN E and CORNFORD T (2005) A critical approach to evaluation. European Journal of Information Systems 14, 229-243. (Pubitemid 43090701)
44. KLEIN HK (1999) Knowledge and methods in is research: from beginnings to the future. In New Information Technologies in Organizational Processes: Field Studies and Theoretical Reflections on the Future of Work (NGWENYAMA O, INTRONA LD, MYERS MD AND GEGROSS J, Eds), pp 13-26, IFIP, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
45. KLEIN HK (2009) Critical social is research today: a reflection of past accomplishments and current challenges. In Critical Management Perspectives on Information Systems (BROOKE C, Ed), pp 249-272, Elsevier Publishers, London.
46. KLEIN HK and HUYNH MQ (1999) The potential of the language action perspective in ethnographic analysis. In New Information Technologies in Organizational Processes: Field Studies and Theoretical Reflections on the Future of Work (NGWENYAMA O, INTRONA LD, MYERS MD AND GEGROSS J, Eds), pp 79-98, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
47. KLEIN HK and HUYNH MQ (2004) The critical social theory of Jurgen Habermas and its implications for is research. In Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems (MINGERS J AND WILLCOCKS L, Eds), pp 157-237, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, U. K.
48. KLEIN HK and MYERS MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information Systems. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 67-93.
49. KNIGHTS D (2009) Power at work in organizations. In The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies (ALVESSON M, BRIDGAM T AND WILLMOTT H, Eds), pp 144-165, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U. K.
50. LYYTINEN K (1992) Information systems and critical theory. In Critical Management Studies (ALVESSON M AND WILLMOTT H, Eds), pp 159-180, SAGE Publications, London.
51. LYYTINEN K and HIRSCHHEIM R (1988) Information systems as rational discourse: an application of Habermas. Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies 4(1/2), 19-30.
52. LYYTINEN K and KLEIN H (1985) The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas as a basis for a theory of information systems. In Research Methods in Information Systems (MUMFORD E, HIRSCHHEIM R, FITZGERALD G AND WOOD-HARPER T, Eds), pp 219-236, Elsevier Science Publishers, North Holland, Amsterdam.
53. MCCARTHY T (1996) The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas 10th print. MIT Press, Cambridge.
54. MCGRATH K (2005) Doing critical research in information systems: a case of theory and practice not informing each other. Information Systems Journal 15(2), 85-101. (Pubitemid 40454327)
55. MINGERS J and WALSHAM G (2008) Towards ethical information systems: the contribution of discourse ethics. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS).
56. MINGERS JC (1981) Towards an appropriate social theory for applied system analysis: critical social and soft system methodologies. Journal of Applied System Analysis 7(1), 41-49.
57. MINGERS JC (2003) The paucity of multimethod research: a review of the information systems literature. Information Systems Journal 13, 233-249.
58. MITEV NN (2006) Postmodernism and criticality in information systems research - what critical management studies can contribute. Social Science Computer Review 24(3), 310-325. (Pubitemid 44022531)
59. MORROW RA and BROWN DD (1994) Critical Theory and Methodology. SAGE Publications, London.
60. MYERS MD (1997) Critical ethnography in information systems. In Information Systems and Qualitative Research (LEE AS, LIEBENAU J AND DEGROSS JI, Eds), pp 276-300, Chapman and Hall, London.
61. MYERS MD and KLEIN HK (forthcoming) A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. MIS Quarterly.
62. NEUMAN WL (2006) Social Research Methods - Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 6th edn. Pearson, Boston.
63. NGWENYAMA OK and LEE AS (1997) Communicative richness in electronic mail: critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. MIS Quarterly 21(2), 145-167.
64. ORLIKOWSKI WJ and BAROUDI JJ (1991) Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research 2(1), 1-28.
65. SCHERER AG (2009) Critical theory and its contribution to critical management studies. In The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies (ALVESSON M, BRIDGAM T AND WILLMOTT H, Eds), pp 29-51, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U. K.
66. SPICER A, ALVESSON M and KARREMAN D (2009) Critical performativity: the unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations 62(4), 537-560.
67. STAHL BC (2008) The ethical nature of critical research in information systems. Information Systems Journal 18, 137-163.
68. THOMAS J (1993) Doing Critical Ethnography. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
69. THOMPSON JB (1981) Critical Hermeneutics: A Study in the Thought of Paul Ricoeur and Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
70. ULRICH W (1987) Critical heuristics of social systems design. European Journal of Operational Research 12(3), 240-259.
71. ULRICH W (2002) Boundary critique. In Informed Student Guide to the Management Science (DAELLENBACH HG AND FLOOD RL, Eds), p 41f, Thompson Learning, London, U. K.
72. ULRICH W (2006) Rethinking critically reflective research practice: Beyond Popper's critical rationalism. Journal of Research Practice 2 Article P1. [WWW document] http://jrp. icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/64/63 (accessed 3 March 2007).
73. VATIMO G (1994) Beyond Interpretation: The Meaning of Hermeneutics for Philosophy. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
74. WALSHAM G (2005) Critical engagement: why, what and how? In Handbook of Information Systems Research: Critical Perspectives on Information Systems Design, Implementation and Use (HOWCROFT D AND TRAUTH E, Eds), pp 225-243, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, U. K.
75. YOGESH KD and KULJIS J (2008) Profile of IS research published in the European journal of information systems. European Journal of Information Systems 17, 678-693.