Focus groups and critical social IS research: How the choice of method can promote emancipation of respondents and researchers

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 378-394

  Stahl, Bernd Carsten ^a   Tremblay, Monica Chiarini ^b   Lerouge, Cynthia M ^c  

^a DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical social research; focus groups; information systems; research methodology

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION USE; SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

CONTRIBUTING FACTOR; CRITICAL RESEARCHES; CRITICAL SOCIAL RESEARCHES; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FOCUS GROUP METHOD; FOCUS GROUPS; RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES; SOCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEM;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 79959548077     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2011.21     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. ABIDI SSR (2001) Knowledge management in health care: towards 'knowledge driven' decision support services. International Journal of Medical Informatics 63, 5-18. (Pubitemid 32757069)
2. ALVESSON M and DEETZ S (2000) Doing Critical Management Research. Sage Publications, London; Thousand Oaks, CA.
3. ALVESSON M and WILLMOTT H (2003) Studying Management Critically. Sage Publications Ltd, London; Thousand Oaks, CA.
4. ASHENDEN S and OWEN D (1999) Foucault Contra Habermas: Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory. London, Sage Publications Ltd.
5. AVGEROU C (2005) Doing critical research in information systems: some further thoughts. Information Systems Journal 15, 103-109. (Pubitemid 40454328)
6. AVGEROU C and MCGRATH K (2007) Power, rationality, and the art of living through socio-technical change. MIS Quarterly 31(2), 295-315. (Pubitemid 46807164)
7. BASHSHUR R (1995) On the definition and evaluation of telemedicine. Telemed Journal 1(1), 19-30.
8. BROADBENT J and LAUGHLIN R (1997) Developing empirical research: an example informed by a Habermasian approach. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 10(5), 622-648.
9. BROOKE C (2002) What does it mean to be 'critical' in is research? Journal of Information Technology 17, 49-57.
10. CECEZ-KECMANOVIC D (2001) Doing critical is research: the question of methodology. In Qualitative Research in is: Issues and Trends (TRAUTH EM, Ed.), pp 141-162, IGI Publishing, Hershey, PA, USA.
11. CECEZ-KECMANOVIC D (2005) Basic assumptions of the critical research perspectives in information systems. In Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research: Theory and Application (TRAUTH DHE, Ed.), pp 19-46, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham, UK.
12. CIBORRA C (2002) The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York, NY.
13. COLLINS K, NICHOLSON P and BOWNS I (2000) Patient satisfaction in telemedicine. Health Informatics Journal 6, 81-85.
14. DAVIES AR (1999) Where do we go from here? Environmental focus groups and planning policy formation. Local Environment 4(3), 295-315.
15. DICKINGER A, ARAMI M and MEYER D (2008) The role of perceived enjoyment and social norm in the adoption of technology with network externalities. European Journal of Information Systems 17(1), 4-12.
16. DOOLIN B (1998) Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretive research on information systems. Journal of Information Technology 13(Special Issue on Interpretive Research in Information Systems, edited by M. Myers and G. Walsham), 301-311. (Pubitemid 128376768)
17. DOOLIN B and MCLEOD L (2005) Towards critical interpretivism in is research. In Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research: Theory and Application (TRAUTH DHE, Ed.), pp 19-46, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham, UK.
18. FERRATT TW, HALL SR, PRASAD J and WYNN JR. DONALD (2010) Choosing Management Information Systems as a Major: Understanding the smiFactors for MIS. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 27(1), 265-284.
19. FOUCAULT M (1971) L'ordre du discourse. Gallimard, Paris.
20. FREEDEN M (2003) Ideology: a very short introduction. In Very Short Introductions p 142, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
21. FRIEDE A, BLUM HL and MCDONALD M (1995) Public health informatics: how information-age technology can strengthen public health. Annual Review of Public Health 16(1), 239-252.
22. GERGEN KJ (1999) An Invitation to Social Construction. Sage, London; Thousand Oaks, CA.
23. GLASS R (2009) Making research more relevant while not diminishing its rigor. IEEE Software 26(2), 96-99.
24. GOULDNER AW (1976) The Dialectic of Ideology and Technology: The Origins, Grammar and Future of Ideology. Macmillan, London.
25. HABERMAS J (1983) Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives. Handeln, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.
26. HABERMASJ (1991) Erläuterungen zur diskursethik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.
27. HABERMAS J (2006) Theorie des kommunikativen handelns. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.
28. HARVEY L (1990) Critical Social Research. Unwin Hyman, London.
29. HAWKES D (1996) Ideology (The New Critical idiom). Routledge, London; New York.
30. HAWKES D (2003) Ideology. Routledge, London; New York.
31. HEVNER A, MARCH S, PARK J and RAM S (2004) Design science research in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly 28(1), 75-105.
32. HIRSCHHEIM R and KLEIN HK (1994) Realizing emancipatory principles in information systems development: the case for ethics. MIS Quarterly 18(1), 83-109.
33. HIRSCHHEIM R, KLEIN HK and LYYTINEN K (1995) Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
34. INTRONA LD (1997) Management, Information and Power: A Narrative of the Involved Manager. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
35. JOHNSON A (1996) It's good to talk: the focus group and the sociological imagination. The Sociological Review 44(3), 517-538. (Pubitemid 126094089)
36. KELLY M (1994) Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London.
37. KEVERN J and WEBB C (2001) Focus groups as a tool for critical social research in nurse education. Nurse Education Today 21(4), 323-333. (Pubitemid 33669001)
38. KINCHELOE JL and MCLAREN P (2005) Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (DENZIN NK AND LINCOLN YS, Eds), p xix, 1210p. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
39. KITZINGER J (1994) The methodology of focus group: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness 16, 102-121.
40. KITZINGER J (1995) Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal 311(7000), 299-302.
41. KITZINGER J and BARBOUR RS (1999) Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory, and Practice. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
42. KLEIN HK (2008) Critical social is research today: a reflection of past accomplishments and current challenges. In Critical Management Perspectives on Information Systems (BROOKE C, Ed.), Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford.
43. KLEIN HK and HUYNH MQ (2004) The critical social theory of Jurgen Habermas and its implications for is research. In Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems (MINGERS J AND WILSON L, Eds), pp 157-237, Wiley, Chichester.
44. KRUEGER RA (1994) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
45. KRUEGER RA and CASEY MA (2000) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
46. KUMAR K, DISSEL HGV and BIELLI P (1998) The merchant of Prato revisited: toward a third rationality of information systems. MIS Quarterly 22(2), 199-226.
47. KVASNY L and RICHARDSON H (2006) Critical research in information systems: looking forward, looking back. Information Technology & People 19(3), 196-202. (Pubitemid 44334980)
48. LEROUGE C, HEVNER A and COLLINS R (2007) It's more than just use: investigating telemedicine use quality. Decision Support Systems 43(4), 1287-1304. (Pubitemid 47223463)
49. LEROUGE C and NIEDERMAN F (2006) Information systems and health care xi: public health knowledge management architecture design: a case study. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 18(9), 2-54.
50. LICHTENSTEIN S and SWATMAN PMC (2003) The potentialities of focus groups in e-business research: theory validation. In Seeking Success in e-Business: A Multidisciplinary Approach (ANDERSEN KV, ELLIOT S, SWATMAN P, TRAUTH E AND BJORN-ANDERSEN N, Eds), pp 207-226, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
51. MCGRATH JE (1981) Dilemmatics. American Behavioral Scientist 25(2), 179-210.
52. MCGRATH K (2005) Doing critical research in information systems: a case of theory and practice not informing each other. Information Systems Journal 15, 85-101. (Pubitemid 40454327)
53. MERTON RK (1987) The focused interview and focus groups: continuities and discontinuties. Public Opinion Quarterly 51, 550-566.
54. MILES MB and HUBERMAN AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
55. MINGERS J and WALSHAM G (2010) Toward ethical information systems: the contribution of discourse ethics. MIS Quarterly 34(4), 833-854.
56. MODEL S (2009) In defence of triangulation: a critical realist approach to mixed methods research in management accounting. Management Accounting Research 20(3), 208-221.
57. MORGAN D (1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
58. MORGAN DL (1988) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
59. MYERS MD (2009) Qualitative Research in Business & Management. Sage Publications, London.
60. MYERS MD and KLEIN HK (2011) A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. MIS Quarterly 35(1), 17-36.
61. MYERS MD and NEWMAN M (2007) The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Information and Organization 17(1), 2-26.
62. NGWENYAMA OK and LEE AS (1997) Communication richness in electronic mail: critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. MIS Quarterly 21(2), 145-167.
63. ORLIKOWSKI WJ and BAROUDI JJ (1991) Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research 2(1), 1-28.
64. PARAYII G (2005) The digital divide and increasing returns: contradictions of informational capitalism. Information Society 21(1), 41.
65. PARSONS T (1975) The sick role and the role of the physician reconsidered. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society 53, 257-278.
66. POWELL RA and SINGLE HM (1996) Focus groups. International Journal of Quality in Health Care 8(5), 499-504. (Pubitemid 126484856)
67. RICHARDSON H and ROBINSON B (2007) The mysterious case of the missing paradigm: a review of critical information systems research 1991-2001. Information Systems Journal 17(3), 251-270.
68. SARAVANAMUTHU K (2002) Information technology and ideology. Journal of Information Technology 17(2), 79.
69. SIMON HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
70. SMOLANDER K, ROSSI M and PURAO S (2008) Software architectures: blueprint, literature, language or decision? European Journal of Information Systems 17(6), 575-589.
71. STAHL BC (2004) Whose discourse? A comparison of the Foucauldian and Habermasian concepts of discourse in critical is research. In the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp 4329-4336, New York.
72. STAHL BC (2006) Emancipation in cross-cultural is research: the fine line between relativism and dictatorship of the intellectual. Ethics and Information Technology 8(3), 97-108. (Pubitemid 44742267)
73. STAHL BC (2008a) The ethical nature of critical research in information systems. Information Systems Journal 18(2), 137-163.
74. STAHL BC (2008b) Information Systems: Critical Perspectives. Routledge, London.
75. STAHL BC and BROOKE C (2008) The contribution of critical is research. Communications of the ACM 51(3), 51-55. (Pubitemid 351357115)
76. STAVEREN IV (1997) Focus groups: contributing to a gender-aware methodology. Feminist Economics 3(2), 131-135.
77. STEWART KJ and GOSAIN S (2006) The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open source software development teams. MIS Quarterly 30(2), 291.
78. TAVAZZI L and ARBUSTINI E (2004) A research project focusing on uncommon aspects and novel markers in congestive heart failure - critical evaluation of multicentre research management. European Heart Journal Supplements 6 (F), F1-F6. (Pubitemid 39505052)
79. TRAUTH E and JESSUP L (2000) Understanding computer-mediated discussions: positivist and interpretive analyses of group support system use. MIS Quarterly 24(1), 43-79.
80. TRAUTH EM and HOWCROFT D (2006) Critical empirical research in is: an example of gender and the it workforce. Information Technology & People 19(3), 272.
81. TREMBLAY MC, HEVNER AR and BERNDT DJ (2010) Focus groups for artifact refinement and evaluation in design research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 26 (27).
82. VILLA DR (1992) Postmodernism and the public sphere. American Political Science Review 86(3), 712-721.
83. WALSHAM G (2005) Learning about being critical. Information Systems Journal 15, 111-117. (Pubitemid 40454329)
84. WARING T (2004) From critical theory into information systems practice: a case study of a payroll-personnel system. In Information Systems Research - Relevant Theory and Informed Practice (KAPLAN B, TRUEX D, WASTELL D, WOOD-HARPER A AND DEGROSS J, Eds), pp 555-575, Springer, Boston.
85. WEBB C and KEVERN J (2008) Focus groups as a research method: a critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 33(6), 798-805.
86. WILDINSON S (1998) Focus groups in feminist research: power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning. Women's Studies International Forum 21(1), 111-125.
87. WILKINSON S (1998) Focus groups in feminist research: power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning. Women's Studies International Forum 21(1), 111-125. (Pubitemid 128407001)
88. WILKINSON S (1999) Focus groups - a feminist method. Psychology of Women Quarterly 23, 221-244.
89. WILSON A (2009) Marketing research: critical perspectives on business and management. International Journal of Market Research 51(6), 843.
90. WILSON V (1997) Focus groups: a useful qualitative method for educational research? Educational Research Journal 23(2), 209-224.