In defence of triangulation: A critical realist approach to mixed methods research in management accounting

Management Accounting Research

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 208-221

  Modell, Sven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Critical realism; Management accounting; Mixed methods research; Triangulation; Validation

Indexed keywords

EID: 67651204454     PISSN: 10445005     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2009.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Abdel-Khalik A.R., and Ajinkya B.B. An evaluation of "the everyday accountant and researching his reality". Accounting, Organizations and Society 8 (1983) 375-384
2. Abernethy M.A., Chua W.F., Luckett P.F., and Selto F.S. Research in managerial accounting: learning from others' experiences. Accounting and Finance 39 (1999) 1-27
3. Ackroyd S. Methodology for management and organisation studies: some implications of critical realism. In: Fleetwood S., and Ackroyd S. (Eds). Critical Realist Applications in Organisation and Management Studies (2004), Routledge, London
4. Ackroyd S., and Fleetwood S. Realism in contemporary organisation and management studies. In: Ackroyd D., and Fleetwood S. (Eds). Realist Perspectives on Management and Organizations (2000), Routledge, London
5. Ahrens T. Overcoming the subjective-objective divide in interpretive management accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33 (2008) 292-297
6. Ahrens T., Becker A., Burns J., Chapman C., Granlund M., Habersam M., Hansen A., Khalifa R., Malmi T., Mennicken A., Mikes A., Panozzo F., Piber M., Quattrone P., and Scheytt T. The future of interpretive accounting research-a polyphonic debate. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 19 (2008) 840-866
7. Ahrens T., and Chapman C.S. Doing qualitative research in management accounting: positioning data to contribute to theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31 (2006) 819-841
8. Anderson S.W., and Widener S.K. Doing quantitative field research in management accounting. In: Chapman C.S., Hopwood A.G., and Shields M.D. (Eds). Handbook of Management Accounting Research vol. 1 (2007), Elsevier, Oxford
9. Baxter J., and Chua W.F. Alternative management accounting research-whence and whither. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 (2003) 97-126
10. Berger P.S., and Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Society (1967), Doubleday, New York
11. Bhaskar R. A Realist Theory of Science. 2nd edition (1978), Harvester Press, Hassocks
12. Bhaskar R. The Possibilities of Naturalism. A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences (1979), Harvester Press, Brighton
13. Bhaskar R. Reclaiming Reality. A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy (1989), Verso, London
14. Birnberg J.G., Shields M.D., and Young S.M. The case for multiple methods in empirical accounting research (with an illustration from budget setting). Journal of Management Accounting Research 2 (1990) 33-66
15. Bisbe J., Batista-Foguet J.-M., and Chenhall R. Defining management accounting constructs: a methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32 (2007) 789-820
16. Blaikie N.W.H. A critique of the use of triangulation in social research. Quality and Quantity 25 (1991) 115-136
17. Blaikie N.W.H. Designing Social Research (2000), Polity Press, Cambridge
18. Brewer J., and Hunter A. Multimethod Research: A Synthesis of Styles (1989), Sage, Thousand Oaks
19. Brown R., and Brignall S. Reflections on the use of a dual-methodology research design to evaluate accounting and management practice in UK university central administrative services. Management Accounting Research 18 (2007) 32-48
20. Bryman A. Quantity and Quality in Social Research (1988), Routledge, London
21. Bryman A. Paradigm peace and the implications for quality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 9 (2006) 111-126
22. Bryman A. Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (2007) 8-22
23. Bryman A., and Bell E. Business Research Methods (2003), Oxford University Press, Oxford
24. Burchell S., Clubb C., Hopwood A.G., Hughes J., and Nahapiet Jr. J. The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society 5 (1980) 5-28
25. Burrell G., and Morgan G. Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis (1979), Heinemann, London
26. Contu A., and Willmott H. You spin me round: the realist turn in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies 42 (2005) 1645-1662
27. Covaleski M.A., and Dirsmith M.W. Budgets as a means of control and loose coupling. Accounting, Organizations and Society 8 (1983) 323-340
28. Covaleski M.A., and Dirsmith M.W. Dialectical tension, double reflexivity and the everyday accounting researcher: on using qualitative methods. Accounting, Organizations and Society 15 (1990) 543-547
29. Covaleski M.A., Dirsmith M.W., and Samuel S. Managerial accounting research: the contributions of organizational and sociological theories. Journal of Management Accounting Research 8 (1996) 1-35
30. Danermark B., Ekstrom M., Jakobsen L., and Karlsson J. Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences (2002), Routledge, London
31. Denzin N.K. The Research Act. A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. 2nd edition (1978), McGraw-Hill, New York
32. DiMaggio P.J., and Powell W.W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48 (1983) 147-160
33. Downward P., and Mearman A. Retroduction as mixed-methods triangulation in economic research: reorienting economics into social science. Cambridge Journal of Economics 31 (2006) 77-99
34. Edmondson A.C., and McManus S.E. Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review 32 (2007) 1155-1179
35. Eisenhardt K.M. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14 (1989) 532-550
36. Erzberger C., and Kelle U. Making inferences in mixed methods: the rules of integration. In: Tashakkori A., and Teddlie C. (Eds). Handbook of Mixed Methods Research in Social and Behavioral Research (2003), Sage, Thousand Oaks
37. Erzberger C., and Prein G. Triangulation: validity and empirically based hypothesis construction. Quality and Quantity 31 (1997) 141-154
38. Fielding N.G., and Fielding J.L. Linking Data: The Articulation of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Social Research (1986), Sage, Beverly Hills CA
39. Fleetwood S. An ontology for organisation and management studies. In: Fleetwood S., and Ackroyd S. (Eds). Critical Realist Applications in Organisation and Management Studies (2004), Routledge, London
40. Fleetwood S. Ontology in organization and management studies: a critical realist perspective. Organization 12 (2005) 197-222
41. Gioia D.A., and Pitre E. Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review 15 (1990) 584-602
42. Greene J.C., and Caracelli V.J. Making paradigmatic sense of mixed methods practice. In: Tashakkori A., and Teddlie C. (Eds). Handbook of Mixed Methods Research in Social and Behavioral Research (2003), Sage, Thousand Oaks
43. Hammersley M. The relationship between qualitative and quantitative research: paradigm loyalty versus methodological eclecticism. In: Richardson J.T.E. (Ed). Handbook of Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences (1996), BPS Books, Leicester
44. Hanson N.R. Patterns of Discovery (1965), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
45. Hopper T., and Hoque Z. Triangulation approaches to accounting research. In: Hoque Z. (Ed). Methodological Issues in Accounting Research. Theories, Methods and Issues (2006), Spiramus, London
46. Hopper T., and Powell A. Making sense of research into the organizational and social aspects of management accounting: a review of its underlying assumptions. Journal of Management Studies 22 (1985) 429-465
47. Hopwood A.G. An Accounting System and Managerial Behaviour (1973), Saxon House, London
48. Hopwood A.G. Whither accounting research?. The Accounting Review 82 (2007) 1365-1374
49. Hopwood A.G. Changing pressures on the research process: on trying to research in an age when curiosity is not enough. European Accounting Review 17 (2008) 87-96
50. Hoque Z., and Hopper T. Rationality, accounting and politics: a case study of management control in a Bangladeshi jute mill. Management Accounting Research 5 (1994) 5-30
51. Hoque Z., and Hopper T. Political and industrial relations turbulence, competition and budgeting in the nationalised jute mills of Bangladesh. Accounting and Business Research 27 (1997) 125-143
52. James W. Pragmatism: A New Name for some Old ways of Thinking (1907), Longmans, New York
53. Jick T.D. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (1979) 602-610
54. Kakkuri-Knuuttila M.-L., Lukka K., and Kuorikoski J. Straddling between paradigms: a naturalistic philosophical case study on interpretive research in management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33 (2008) 267-291
55. Kakkuri-Knuuttila M.-L., Lukka K., and Kuorikoski J. No premature closures of debates, please: a response to Ahrens. Accounting Organizations and Society 33 (2008) 298-301
56. Khalifa R., and Quattrone P. The governance of accounting academia: issues for a debate. European Accounting Review 17 (2008) 65-86
57. Koro-Ljungberg M. Impossibilities of reconciliation: validity in mixed theory projects. Qualitative Inquiry 10 (2004) 601-621
58. Kwok W.C., and Sharp D.J. A review of construct measurement issues in behavioural accounting research. Journal of Accounting Literature 17 (1998) 137-179
59. Leca B., and Naccache P. A critical realist approach to institutional entrepreneurship. Organization 13 (2006) 627-651
60. Lewis M.W., and Grimes A.J. Metatriangulation: building theories from multiple paradigms. Academy of Management Review 24 (1999) 672-690
61. Lillis A.M., and Mundy J. Cross-sectional field studies in management accounting research-closing the gap between surveys and case studies. Journal of Management Accounting Research 17 (2005) 119-141
62. Lindsay R.M. Reconsidering the status of tests of significance: an alternative criterion of adequacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (1995) 35-53
63. Lindsay R.M., and Ehrenberg A.S.C. The design of replicated studies. American Statistician 47 (1993) 217-228
64. Llewellyn S. Case studies and differentiated realities. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management 4 (2007) 53-68
65. Lounsbury M. Institutional rationality and practice variation: new directions in the institutional analysis of practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33 (2008) 349-361
66. Lukka K., and Kasanen E. The problem of generalizability: anecdotes and evidence in accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 8 5 (1995) 71-90
67. Maxcy S.J. Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: the search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In: Tashakkori A., and Teddlie C. (Eds). Handbook of Mixed Methods Research in Social and Behavioral Research (2003), Sage, Thousand Oaks
68. Meyer J.W., and Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (1977) 340-363
69. Mingers J. The contribution of critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for OR/MS and systems. Journal of the Operational Research Society 51 (2000) 1256-1270
70. Mingers J. A critique of statistical modelling in management science from a critical realist perspective: its role within multimethodology. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57 (2006) 202-219
71. Mintzberg H. The Structuring of Organizations (1979), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
72. Modell S. Triangulation between case study and survey methods in management accounting research: an assessment of validity implications. Management Accounting Research 16 (2005) 231-254
73. Modell S. Mixed methods research in management accounting: opportunities and obstacles. In: Granlund M. (Ed). Total Quality in Academic Accounting. Essays in Honour of Kari Lukka (2007), Publications of Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Turku
74. Modell, S., 2009. Institutional research on performance measurement and management in the public sector accounting literature: a review and assessment. Financial Accountability and Management, in press.
75. Moran-Ellis J., Alexander V.D., Cronin A., Dickinson M., Fielding J., Sleney J., and Thomas H. Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research 6 (2006) 45-59
76. Niiniluoto I. Critical Scientific Realism (1999), Oxford University Press, Oxford
77. Nørreklit L., Nørreklit H., and Israelsen P. The validity of management control topoi. Towards constructivist pragmatism. Management Accounting Research 17 (2006) 42-71
78. Otley D.T. Budget use and managerial performance. Journal of Accounting Research 16 (1978) 122-149
79. Ouchi W.G. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science 25 (1979) 833-848
80. Panozzo F. The making of good academic accountants. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22 (1997) 447-480
81. Peirce C.S. In: Hartshorne C., and Weiss P. (Eds). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (1960), Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA
82. Pihlström S. How (not) to write the history of pragmatist philosophy of science?. Perspectives on Science 16 (2008) 26-69
83. Reed M. Reflections on the 'realist turn' in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies 42 (2005) 1621-1644
84. Reed M. Doing the loco-motion: response to Contu and Willmott's commentary on 'The realist turn in organization and management studies'. Journal of Management Studies 42 (2005) 1663-1673
85. Reiter S.A., and Williams P.F. The structure and progressivity of accounting research: the crisis in the academy revisited. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 (2002) 575-607
86. Richardson L. Writing: a method of inquiry. In: Denzin N.K., and Lincoln Y.S. (Eds). Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd edition (2000), Sage, Thousand Oaks
87. Ryan B., Scapens R.W., and Theobald M. Research Method and Methodology in Finance and Accounting. 2nd edition (2002), Thomson, Padstow
88. Sayer A. Realism and Social Science (2000), Sage, Thousand Oaks
89. Sayer A. Foreword: why critical realism?. In: Fleetwood S., and Ackroyd S. (Eds). Critical Realist Applications in Organisation and Management Studies (2004), Routledge, London
90. Silverman D. Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction (1993), Sage, Thousand Oaks
91. Smaling A. The pragmatic dimension. Paradigmatic and pragmatic aspects of choosing a qualitative or quantitative method. Quality and Quantity 28 (1994) 233-249
92. Smith J.K., and Deemer D.K. The problem of criteria in the age of relativism. In: Denzin N.K., and Lincoln Y.S. (Eds). Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd edition (2000), Sage, Thousand Oaks
93. Smith J.K., and Hodkinson P. Relativism, criteria and politics. In: Denzin N.K., and Lincoln Y.S. (Eds). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd edition (2005), Sage, Thousand Oaks
94. Smith M.L. Overcoming theory-practice inconsistencies: critical realism and information systems research. Information and Organization 16 (2006) 191-211
95. Swieringa R.J., and Moncur R.H. Some Effects of Participative Budgeting on Managerial Behavior (1975), National Association of Accountants, New York
96. Symon G., Buehring A., Johnson P., and Cassell C. Positioning qualitative research as resistance to the institutionalization of the academic labour process. Organization Studies 29 (2008) 1315-1336
97. Tashakkori A., and Teddlie C. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (1998), Sage, Thousand Oaks
98. Teddlie C., and Tashakkori A. Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In: Tashakkori A., and Teddlie C. (Eds). Handbook of Mixed Methods Research in Social and Behavioral Research (2003), Sage, Thousand Oaks
99. Tomkins C., and Groves R. The everyday accountant and researching his reality. Accounting, Organizations and Society 8 (1983) 361-374
100. Tomkins C., and Groves R. "The everyday accountant and researching his reality": further thoughts. Accounting, Organizations and Society 8 (1983) 407-415
101. Tsang E.W.K., and Kwan K.-M. Replication and theory development in organizational science: a critical realist perspective. Academy of Management Review 24 (1999) 759-780
102. Tsoukas H. The validity of idiographic research explanations. Academy of Management Review 14 (1989) 551-561
103. Tuttle B., and Dillard J.F. Beyond competition: institutional isomorphism in U.S. accounting research. Accounting Horizons 21 (2007) 387-410
104. Wildavsky A. Budgeting: A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Processes (1975), Little Brown & Co, Boston
105. Wolfram Cox J., and Hassard J. Triangulation in organizational research: a re-presentation. Organization 12 (2005) 109-133
106. Yin R.K. Case Study Research. Design and Methods (1984), Sage, Newbury Park
107. Zimmerman J. Conjectures regarding empirical management accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32 (2001) 411-427