The contribution of critical IS research

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 51-55

  Stahl, Bernd Carsten ^a   Brooke, Carole ^b  

^a DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROBLEM SOLVING; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

ETHICAL ISSUES; TRADITIONAL PRACTICES;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 40549143672     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: 15577317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1325555.1325566     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Adam, A. Computer ethics in a different voice. Information and Organization 11 (2001), 235-261.
2. Anderson, R.E., Johnson, D.G., Gotterbam, D., and Perrolle, J. Using the new ACM. code of ethics in decision making. Commun. ACM36, 2 (Feb. 1993), 98-106.
3. Brooke, C. What does it mean to be 'critical' in IS research? J. Information Technology 17, 2 (2002), 49-57.
4. Brooke, C. and Maguire, S. Systems development: A. restrictive practice? Intern. J. Information Management 18, 3 (1998), 165-180.
5. Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. Doing critical IS research: The question of methodology. Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends. E. Trauth, Ed. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 2001, 141-162.
6. Heng, M.S.H. and de Moor, A. From Habermas's communicative theory to practice on the Internet. Information Systems J. 13 (2003), 331-352.
7. Hine, M., Hill, M. Ruth, D., Carlson, B., Bank, D. and Troxell, J. Empowering persons with disabilities with decision-support technology. Commun. ACM 47, 9 (Sept. 2004), 85-90.
8. Lyytinen, K. and Hirschheim, R. Information systems as rational discourse: An application of Habermas Theory of communicative action. Scandinavian Journal of Management 4, 1/2 (1988) 19-30.
9. Keil, M., Tiwana, A., and Bush, A. Reconciling user and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: A Delphi study. Information Systems Journal 12, (2002), 103-119.
10. Orlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J.J. Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research 2, 1 (1991), 1-28.
11. Sauer, C. Why Information Systems Fail: A Case Study Approach. McGraw Hill, London, 1993.
12. Schmidt, R. et al. Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study. J. Management Information Systems 17, 4 (2001), 5-36.