Environment specific substitution tables improve membrane protein alignment

Bioinformatics

Volumn 27, Issue 13, 2011, Pages

  Hill, Jamie R ^a   Kelm, Sebastian ^a   Shi, Jiye ^b,c   Deane, Charlotte M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UCB PHARMA   (Belgium)

^c SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY;

HUMANS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 79959410445     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr230     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Almén, M. et al. (2009) Mapping the human membrane proteome: a majority of thehuman membrane proteins can be classified according to function and evolutionaryorigin. BMC Biol., 7, 50.
2. Altschul, S.F. et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of proteindatabase search programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389-3402.
3. Berman, H.M. et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 235-242.
4. Edgar, R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and highthroughput. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 1792-1797.
5. Engelman, D.M. and Zaccai, G. (1980) Bacteriorhodopsin is an inside-out protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 77, 5894-5898.
6. Forrest, L. et al. (2006) On the accuracy of homology modeling and sequence alignment methods applied to membrane proteins. Biophy. J., 91, 508-517.
7. Gong, S. et al. (2009) Structural and functional restraints in the evolution of protein families and superfamilies. Biochemical Society Trans., 37(Pt 4), 727-733.
8. Henikoff, S. and Henikoff, J.G. (1992) Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 10915-10919.
9. Hotelling, H. (1933) Analysis of complex statistical variables into principal components. J. Educ. Psychol., 24, 417-441.
10. Hubbard, T. and Blundell, T. (1987) Comparison of solvent-inaccessible cores of homologous proteins: definitions useful for protein modelling. Protein Eng., 1, 159-171.
11. Jones, D. et al. (1994) A mutation data matrix for transmembrane proteins. FEBS Lett., 339, 269-275.
12. Kelm, S. et al. (2009) iMembrane: homology-based membrane-insertion of proteins. Bioinformatics, 25, 1086-1088.
13. Kelm, S. et al. (2010) MEDELLER: homology-based coordinate generation for membrane proteins. Bioinformatics, 26, 2833-2840.
14. Li, W. and Godzik, A. (2006) Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics, 22, 1658-1659.
15. Mizuguchi, K. et al. (1998a) HOMSTRAD: a database of protein structure alignments for homologous families. Protein Sci., 7, 2469-2471.
16. Mizuguchi, K. et al. (1998b) JOY: protein sequence-structure representation and analysis. Bioinformatics, 14, 617-623.
17. Mizuguchi, K. et al. (2007) Environment specific substitution tables for thermophilic proteins. BMC bioinformatics, 8 (Suppl. 1), S15.
18. Mokrab, Y. and Mizuguchi, K. (2005) Amino-Acid substitutions in membrane proteins: applications to homology recognition and comparative modelling. BMC Bioinformatics, 6(Suppl. 3), S9.
19. Mokrab, Y. et al. (2010) A structural dissection of amino acid substitutions in helical transmembrane proteins. Proteins, 78, 2895-2907.
20. Moult, J. et al. (2009) Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction -Round VIII. Proteins, 77 (Suppl. 9), 1-4.
21. Müller, T. et al. (2001) Non-symmetric score matrices and the detection of homologous transmembrane proteins. Bioinformatics, 17 (Suppl. 1), S182-S189.
22. Ng, P.C. et al. (2000) PHAT: a transmembrane-specific substitution matrix. Bioinformatics, 16, 760-766.
23. Pirovano, W. et al. (2008) PRALINE: a strategy for improved multiple alignment of transmembrane proteins. Bioinformatics, 24, 492-497.
24. Sali, A. (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol., 234, 779-815.
25. Sánchez, R. (1997) Advances in comparative protein-structure modelling. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 7, 206-214.
26. Scott, K.A. et al. (2008) Coarse-grained MD simulations of membrane Protein-Bilayer self-assembly. Structure, 16, 621-630.
27. Shi, J. et al. (2001) FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J. Mol. Biol., 310, 243-257.
28. Stevens, T.J. and Arkin, I.T. (1999) Aremembrane proteins inside-out proteins? Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet., 36, 135-143.
29. Tastan, O. et al. (2009) The effect of loops on the structural organization of alpha-helical membrane proteins. Biophys. J., 96, 2299-2312.
30. Tusnády, G. et al. (2005) PDB_TM: selection and membrane localization of transmembrane proteins in the protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, D275-D278.
31. Zhang, Y. and Skolnick, J. (2005) TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, 2302-2309.