Evolutionary genetics of plant adaptation

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 27, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 258-266

  Anderson, Jill T ^a   Willis, John H ^a   Mitchell Olds, Thomas ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; DROUGHT; ECOLOGICAL GENETICS; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FLOWERING; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOTYPE; NEAR ISOGENIC LINE; OUTCROSSING; PERENNIAL PLANT; PHENOTYPE; PLANT EVOLUTION; PLANT GENETICS; PLEIOTROPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; RECOMBINANT INBRED STRAIN; REVIEW;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; GENETIC FITNESS; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 79959345137     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: 01689525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.04.001     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Tishkoff S.A., et al. Convergent adaptation of human lactase persistence in Africa and Europe. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 39:31-40.
2. Sattath S., et al. Pervasive adaptive protein evolution apparent in diversity patterns around amino acid substitutions in Drosophila simulans. Public Library Sci. Genet. 2011, 7:e1001302.
3. Bakker E., et al. A genome-wide survey of R gene polymorphisms in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18:1803-1818.
4. Turner T.L., et al. Population resequencing reveals local adaptation of Arabidopsis lyrata to serpentine soils. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:260-263.
5. Excoffier L., et al. Detecting loci under selection in a hierarchically structured population. Heredity 2009, 103:285-298.
6. Chen H., et al. Population differentiation as a test for selective sweeps. Genome Res. 2010, 20:393-402.
7. Coop G., et al. Using environmental correlations to identify loci underlying local adaptation. Genetics 2010, 185:1411-1423.
8. Burke M.K., et al. Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila. Nature 2010, 467:587-590.
9. Hernandez R.D., et al. Classic selective sweeps were rare in recent human evolution. Science 2011, 331:920-924.
10. Pritchard J., Di Rienzo A. Not by sweeps alone. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:665-667.
11. Geber M., Griffen L.R. Inheritance and natural selection on functional traits. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2003, 164:S21-42.
12. Metcalf C.J.E., Mitchell-Olds T. Life history in a model system: opening the black box with Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:593-600.
13. Mitchell-Olds T., et al. Which evolutionary processes influence natural genetic variation for phenotypic traits?. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:845-856.
14. Parachnowitsch A.L., Caruso C.M. Predispersal seed herbivores, not pollinators, exert selection on floral traits via female fitness. Ecology 2008, 89:1802-1810.
15. Knight C.A., et al. Expression profiling and local adaptation of Boechera holboellii populations for water use efficiency across a naturally occurring water stress gradient. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15:1229-1237.
16. Dechaine J.M., et al. Constraints on the evolution of adaptive plasticity: costs of plasticity to density are expressed in segregating progenies. New Phytologist 2007, 176:874-882.
17. Donohue K., et al. Evidence of adaptive divergence in plasticity: density- and site-dependent selection on shade-avoidance responses in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 2000, 54:1956-1968.
18. Neale D.B., Ingvarsson P.K. Population, quantitative and comparative genomics of adaptation in forest trees. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11:149-155.
19. Schranz M.E., et al. Ecological genomics of Boechera stricta: identification of a QTL controlling the allocation of methionine- vs. branched-chain amino acid-derived glucosinolates and levels of insect herbivory. Heredity 2009, 102:465-474.
20. Anderson J.T., et al. Life-history QTLs and natural selection on flowering time in Boechera stricta, a perennial relative of Arabidopsis. Evolution 2011, 65:771-787.
21. Anderson J.T., Mitchell-Olds T. Ecological genetics and genomics of plant defenses: evidence and approaches. Funct. Ecol. 2011, 25:312-324.
22. Herrera C.M., Bazaga P. Quantifying the genetic component of phenotypic variation in unpedigreed wild plants: tailoring genomic scan for within-population use. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:2602-2614.
23. Stinchcombe J.R., Hoekstra H.E. Combining population genomics and quantitative genetics: finding the genes underlying ecologically important traits. Heredity 2008, 100:158-170.
24. Manel S., et al. Perspectives on the use of landscape genetics to detect genetic adaptive variation in the field. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:3760-3772.
25. Mitchell-Olds T. Complex-trait analysis in plants. Genome Biol. 2010, 11:113.
26. Atwell S., et al. Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in a common set of Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature 2010, 465:627-631.
27. Ingvarsson P.K., Street N.R. Association genetics of complex traits in plants. New Phytologist 2011, 189:909-922.
28. Myles S., et al. Association mapping: critical considerations shift from genotyping to experimental design. The Plant Cell 2009, 21:2194-2202.
29. Hohenlohe P.A., et al. Using population genomics to detect selection in natural populations: key concepts and methodological considerations. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 171:1059-1071.
30. Pritchard J., et al. The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, Soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:R208-215.
31. Leimu R., Fischer M. A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. Public Library Sci. One 2008, 3:e4010.
32. Bomblies K. Doomed lovers: mechanisms of isolation and incompatibility in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61:109-124.
33. Hall M.C., et al. Is local adaptation in Mimulus guttatus caused by trade-offs at individual loci?. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:2739-2753.
34. Verhoeven K.J.F., et al. Habitat-specific natural selection at a flowering-time QTL is a main driver of local adaptation in two wild barley populations. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:3416-3424.
35. Verhoeven K.J.F., et al. The genetic basis of adaptive population differentiation: a quantitative trait locus analysis of fitness traits in two wild barley populations from contrasting habitats. Evolution 2004, 58:270-283.
36. Gardner K.M., Latta R.G. Identifying loci under selection across contrasting environments in Avena barbata using quantitative trait locus mapping. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15:1321-1333.
37. Lowry D.B., et al. Genetic and physiological basis of adaptive salt tolerance divergence between coastal and inland Mimulus guttatus. New Phytologist 2009, 183:776-788.
38. Li Z.K., et al. QTL X environment interactions in rice. I. Heading date and plant height. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2003, 108:141-153.
39. Weinig C., et al. Heterogeneous selection at specific loci in natural environments in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 2003, 165:321-329.
40. Lowry D.B., Willis J.H. A widespread chromosomal inversion polymorphism contributes to a major life-history transition, local adaptation, and reproductive isolation. Public Library Sci. Biol. 2010, 8:e1000500.
41. Elzinga J.A., et al. Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:432-439.
42. Inouye D.W. Effects of climate change on phenology, frost damage, and floral abundance of montane wildflowers. Ecology 2008, 89:353-362.
43. Li Y., et al. Association mapping of local climate-sensitive quantitative trait loci in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:21199-21204.
44. Hall M.C., Willis J.H. Divergent selection on flowering time contributes to local adaptation in Mimulus guttatus populations. Evolution 2006, 60:2466-2477.
45. Sandring S., Ågren J. Pollinator-mediated selection on floral display and flowering time in the perennial herb Arabidopsis lyrata. Evolution 2009, 63:1292-1300.
46. Wang R., et al. PEP1 regulates perennial flowering in Arabis alpina. Nature 2009, 459:423-427.
47. Kim D.H., et al. Vernalization: winter and the timing of flowering in plants. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2009, 25:277-299.
48. Franks S.J., et al. Rapid evolution of flowering time by an annual plant in response to a climate fluctuation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:1278-1282.
49. Ehrenreich I.M., et al. Candidate gene association mapping of Arabidopsis flowering time. Genetics 2009, 183:325-335.
50. Wellmer F., Riechmann J.L. Gene networks controlling the initiation of flower development. Trends Genet. 2010, 26:519-527.
51. Turck F., et al. Regulation and identity of florigen: FLOWERING LOCUS T moves center stage. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59:573-594.
52. Jung C., Muller A.E. Flowering time control and applications in plant breeding. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14:563-573.
53. Böhlenius H., et al. CO/FT regulatory module controls timing of flowering and seasonal growth cessation in trees. Science 2006, 312:1040-1043.
54. Schwartz C., et al. Cis-regulatory changes at FLOWERING LOCUS T mediate natural variation in flowering responses of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 2009, 183:723-732.
55. Skøt L., et al. Allelic variation in the perennial ryegrass Flowering Locus T gene is associated with changes in flowering time across a range of populations. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155:1013-1022.
56. Hayama R., et al. A circadian rhythm set by dusk determines the expression of FT homologs and the short-day photoperiodic flowering response in Pharbitis. The Plant Cell 2007, 19:2988-3000.
57. Lin M.-K., et al. FLOWERING LOCUS T protein may act as the long-distance florigenic signal in the cucurbits. The Plant Cell 2007, 19:1488-1506.
58. Shalit A., et al. The flowering hormone florigen functions as a general systemic regulator of growth and termination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:8392-8397.
59. Blackman B.K., et al. The role of recently derived FT paralogs in sunflower domestication. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:1-7.
60. Weinig C., et al. Novel loci control variation in reproductive timing in Arabidopsis thaliana in natural environments. Genetics 2002, 162:1875-1884.
61. Brachi B., et al. Linkage and association mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana flowering time in nature. Public Library Sci. Genet. 2010, 6:e1000940.
62. Wu C.A., et al. Natural variation for drought-response traits in the Mimulus guttatus species complex. Oecologia 2010, 162:23-33.
63. Hausmann N., et al. Quantitative trail loci affecting delta-13C and response to differential water availability in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 2005, 59:81-96.
64. Bernier J., et al. The large-effect drought-resistance QTL qtl12.1 increases water uptake in upland rice. Field Crops Res. 2009, 110:139-146.
65. Reynolds M., Tuberosa R. Translational research impacting on crop productivity in drought-prone environments. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11:171-179.
66. Tardieu F., Tuberosa R. Dissection and modelling of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13:206-212.
67. Maherali H., et al. Adaptive value and costs of physiological plasticity to soil moisture limitation in recombinant inbred lines of Avena barbata. Am. Nat. 2010, 175:211-224.
68. Sherrard M., et al. Water stress alters the genetic architecture of functional traits associated with drought adaptation in Avena barbata. Evolution 2009, 63:702-715.
69. Juenger T., et al. Exploring genetic and expression differences between physiologically extreme ecotypes: comparative genomic hybridization and gene expression studies of Kas-1 and Tsu-1 accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant, Cell Environ. 2010, 33:1268-1284.
70. Oh S.-J., et al. Overexpression of the transcription factor AP37 in rice improves grain yield under drought conditions. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150:1368-1379.
71. Ackerly D.D., et al. The geography of climate change: implications for conservation biogeography. Divers. Distributions 2010, 16:476-487.
72. Colautti R.I., Barrett S.C.H. Natural selection and genetic constraints on flowering phenology in an invasive plant. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 171:960-971.
73. Ouborg N.J., et al. The rough edges of the conservation genetics paradigm for plants. J. Ecol. 2006, 94:1233-1248.
74. Willi Y., et al. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2006, 37:433-458.
75. Hoffmeister T.S., et al. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biological invasion and habitat fragmentation. Ecosystems 2005, 8:657-667.
76. Parker I.M., et al. An evolutionary approach to understanding the biology of invasions: local adaptation and general purpose genotype in the weed Verbascum thapsus. Conservation Biol. 2003, 17:59-72.
77. Lankau R.A., et al. Evolutionary limits ameliorate the negative impact of an invasive plant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:15362-15367.
78. Keller S.R., et al. Adaptation and colonization history affect the evolution of clines in two introduced species. New Phytologist 2009, 183:678-690.
79. Jump A.S., Peñuelas J. Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation in a wind-pollinated tree. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:8096-8100.
80. Hoffmann A.A., Willi Y. Detecting genetic responses to environmental change. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9:421-432.
81. Parmesan C. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2006, 37:637-669.
82. Lenoir J., et al. A significant upward shift in plant species optimum evolution during the 20th Century. Science 2008, 320:1768-1771.
83. Massot M., et al. Climate warming, dispersal inhibition and extinction risk. Global Change Biol. 2008, 14:461-469.
84. Fox C.W., Reed D.H. Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: an experimental study and meta-analysis. Evolution 2010, 65:246-258.
85. Damschen E.I., et al. Corridors increase plant species richness at large scales. Science 2006, 313:1284-1286.
86. Rausher M.D. Evolutionary transitions in floral color. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2008, 169:7-21.
87. Bradshaw H.D., Schemske D.W. Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowers. Nature 2003, 426:176-178.
88. Streisfeld, M.A. and Rausher, M.D. (2011) Population genetics, pleiotropy, and the preferential fixation of mutations during adaptive evolution. Evolution doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01165.x.
89. Cooley, A et al. (2011) Gene duplication in Mimulus underlies parallel floral evolution via independent trans-regulatory changes. Curr. Biol. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.028.
90. Hopkins R., Rausher M.D. Identification of two genes causing reinforcement in the Texas wildflower Phlox drummondii. Nature 2011, 469:411-414.
91. Bergelson J., Roux F. Towards identifying genes underlying ecologically relevant traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:867-879.
92. Hamblin M.T., et al. Population genetics of genomics-based crop improvement methods. Trends Genet. 2011, 27:98-106.
93. Anderson J.T., et al. Phenotypic plasticity despite source-sink population dynamics in a long-lived perennial plant. New Phytologist 2010, 188:856-867.
94. Baythavong B.S., Stanton M.L. Characterizing selection on phenotypic plasticity in response to natural environmental heterogeneity. Evolution 2010, 64:2904-2920.
95. Lacaze X., et al. Genetics of phenotypic plasticity: QTL analysis in barley, Hordeum vulgare. Heredity 2009, 102:163-173.
96. Steinger T., et al. Evolution in stressful environments II: adaptive value and costs of plasticity in response to low light in Sinapis arvensis. J. Evol. Biol. 2003, 16:313-323.
97. Richards C.L., et al. What role does heritable epigenetic variation play in phenotypic evolution?. Bioscience 2010, 60:232-237.
98. Feng S., et al. Epigenetic reprogramming in plant and animal development. Science 2010, 330:622-627.
99. Oyama R.K., et al. The shrunken genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Syst. Evol. 2008, 273:257-271.
100. Hu T.T., et al. The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:476-481.