Natural selection and genetic constraints on flowering phenology in an invasive plant

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 171, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 960-971

  Colautti, Robert I ^a,b   Barrett, Spencer C H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological invasion; Field experiment; Fitness trade off; Lythrum salicaria; Principal components analysis; Rapid evolution

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; DICOTYLEDON; FITNESS; INVASIVE SPECIES; LATITUDINAL GRADIENT; LOCAL ADAPTATION; NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

LYTHRACEAE; LYTHRUM SALICARIA;

EID: 78650163109     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/656444     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Alexander JM, PJ Edwards, M Poll, CG Parks, H Dietz 2009 Establishment of parallel altitudinal clines in traits of native and introduced forbs. Ecology 90:612-622.
2. Baker HG 1955 Self-compatibility and establishment after "longdistance" dispersal. Evolution 9:347-349.
3. - 1965 Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. Pages 147-168 in HG Baker, GL Stebbins, eds. The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York.
4. Barrett SCH 2010 Why reproductive systems matter for the invasion biology of plants. In Richardson DM, ed. Fifty years of invasion ecology: The legacy of Charles Elton. Blackwell, Oxford (forthcoming).
5. Barton NH, M Turelli 1987 Adaptive landscapes, genetic distance and the evolution of quantitative characters. Genet Res 49:157-173.
6. Bennington CC, JB McGraw 1995 Natural selection and ecotypic differentiation in Impatiens pallida. Ecol Monogr 65:303-323.
7. Blossey B, R Nötzold 1995 Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: A hypothesis. J Ecol 83:887-889.
8. Bulmer MG 1971 The effect of selection on genetic variability. Am Nat 105:201-211.
9. Byers DL, DM Waller 1999 Do plant populations purge their genetic load? effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:479-513.
10. Caballero A, MA Toro, C Lopez-Fanjul 1991 The response to artificial selection from new mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 128:89-102.
11. Chun YJ, ML Collyer, KA Moloney, JD Nason 2007 Phenotypic plasticity of native vs. invasive purple loosestrife: A two-state multivariate approach. Ecology 88:1499-1512.
12. Chun YJ, JD Nason, KA Moloney 2009 Comparison of quantitative and molecular genetic variation of native vs. invasive populations of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L. Lythraceae). Mol Ecol 18: 3020-3035.
13. Colautti RI, CG Eckert, SCH Barrett 2010a Evolutionary constraints on adaptive evolution during range expansion in an invasive plant. Proc R Soc B 17:373-383.
14. Colautti RI, JL Maron, SCH Barrett 2009 Common garden comparisons of native and introduced plant populations: Latitudinal clines can obscure evolutionary inferences. Evol Appl 2:187-199.
15. Colautti RI, NA White, SCH Barrett 2010b Variation of selfincompatibility within invasive populations of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.) from eastern North America. Int J Plant Sci 171:158-166.
16. Conner JK 2002 Genetic mechanisms of floral trait correlations in a natural population. Nature 420:407-410.
17. Eckhart VM,MA Geber, CMMcGuire 2004 Experimental studies of adaptation in Clarkia xantiana. I. Sources of trait variation across a subspecies border. Evolution 58:59-70.
18. Edmonds CA, AS Lillie, LL Cavalli-Sforza 2004 Mutations arising in the wave of an expanding population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 975-979.
19. Endler JA 1986 Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
20. Etterson JR 2004 Evolutionary potential of Chamaecrista fasciculata in relation to climate change. I. Clinal patterns of selection along an environmental gradient in the Great Plains. Evolution 58:1446-1458.
21. Etterson JR, RG Shaw 2001 Constraint on adaptive evolution in response to global warming. Science 294:151-154.
22. Eyre-Walker A, PD Keightley 2007 The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nat Rev Genet 8:610-618.
23. Falconer DS, TFC Mackay 1996 Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, Essex, United Kingdom.
24. Fenster CB, WS Armbruster, P Wilson, MR Dudash, JD Thompson 2004 Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:375-403.
25. Fisher RA 1930 The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon, Oxford.
26. Fox GA 1989 Consequences of flowering-time variation in a desert annual: Adaptation and history. Ecology 70:1294-1306.
27. Franke DM, AG Ellis, M Dharjwa, M Freshwater, M Fujikawa, A Padron, AE Weis 2006 A steep cline in flowering time for Brassica rapa in Southern California: Population-level variation in the field and the greenhouse. Int J Plant Sci 167:83-92.
28. Franks SJ, S Sim, AEWeis 2007 Rapid evolution of flowering time by an annual plant in response to climate fluctuation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:1278-1282.
29. Geyer CJ, S Wagenius, RG Shaw 2007 Aster models for life history analysis. Biometrika 94:415-426.
30. Gomulkiewicz R, RD Holt, M Barfield, S Nuismer 2010 Genetics, adaptation and invasion in harsh environments. Evol Appl 3:97-108.
31. Griffith TM, MA Watson 2006 Is evolution necessary for range expansion? manipulating reproductive timing of a weedy annual transplanted beyond its range. Am Nat 167:153-164.
32. Hall MC, JH Willis 2006 Divergent selection on flowering time contributes to local adaptation in Mimulus guttatus populations. Evolution 60:2466-2477.
33. Harder LD, SD Johnson 2009 Darwin's beautiful contrivances: Evolutionary and functional evidence for floral adaptation. New Phytol 183:530-545.
34. Herrera CM, MC Castellanos, M Medrano 2006 Geographical context of floral evolution: Towards an improved research programme in floral diversification. Pages 278-294 in LD Harder, SCH Barrett, eds. Ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
35. Hill WG, A Caballero 1992 Artificial selection experiments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:287-310.
36. Houghton-Thompson J, HH Prince, JJ Smith, JF Hancock 2005 Evidence of hybridization between Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) and L. alatum (winged loosestrife) in North America. Ann Bot 96:877-885.
37. Hulme PE 2008 Phenotypic plasticity and plant invasions: Is it all Jack? Funct Ecol 22:3-7.
38. Johnson T, N Barton 2005 Theoretical models of selection and mutation on quantitative traits. Philos Trans R Soc B 360:1411-1425.
39. Keane RM, MJ Crawley 2002 Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164-170.
40. Keller SR, DR Sowell, M Neiman, LM Wolfe, DR Taylor 2009 Adaptation and colonization history affect the evolution of clines in two introduced species. New Phytol 183:678-690.
41. Kingsolver JG, HE Hoekstra, JM Hoekstra, D Berrigan, SN Vignieri, CE Hill, A Hoang, P Gilbert, P Beerli 2001 The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am Nat 157:245-261.
42. Kittelson PM, JL Maron 2001 Fine-scale genetically based differentiation of life-history traits in the perennial shrub Lupinus arboreus. Evolution 55:2429-2438.
43. Lande R 1979 Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain : Body size allometry. Evolution 33:402-416.
44. Lande R, SJ Arnold 1983 The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
45. Lankau RA, V Nuzzo, G Spyreas, AS Davis 2010 Evolutionary limits ameliorate the negative impact of an invasive plant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:15362-15367.
46. Lee CE 2002 Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol 17:386-391.
47. Leger EA, KJ Rice 2007 Assessing the speed and predictability of local adaptation in invasive California poppies (Eschscholzia californica). J Evol Biol 20:1090-1103.
48. Lempe J, S Balasubramanian, S Sureshkumar, A Singh, M Schmid, D Weigel 2005 Diversity of flowering responses in wild Arabidopsis thaliana strains. PLoS Genet 1:e6.
49. Levin DA 1988 Plasticity, canalization and evolutionary stasis in plants. Pages 35-45 in AJ Davy, MJ Hutchings, ARWatkinson, eds. Plant population ecology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
50. Lynch M, J Blanchard, D Houle, T Kibota, S Schultz, L Vassilieva, J Willis 1999 Spontaneous deleterious mutation. Evolution 53:645-663.
51. Lynch M, B Walsh 1998 Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
52. Mackay TFC, JD Fry, RF Lyman, SV Nuzhdin 1994 Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: Estimates from response to selection of inbred strains. Genetics 136:937-951.
53. Mal TK, J Lovett-Doust 2005 Phenotypic plasticity in vegetative and reproductive traits in an invasive weed, Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae), in response to soil moisture. Am J Bot 92:819-825.
54. Mal TK, J Lovett-Doust, L Lovett-Doust, GA Mulligan 1992 The biology of Canadian weeds. 100. Lythrum salicaria. Can J Plant Sci 72:1305-1330.
55. Malecki RA, B Blossey, SD Hight, D Schroeder, LT Kok, JR Coulson 1993 Biological control of purple loosestrife. BioScience 43:480-486.
56. Maron JL, SC Elmendorf, M Vilà 2007 Contrasting plant physiological adaptation to climate in the native and introduced range of Hypericum perforatum. Evolution 61:1912-1924.
57. Maron JL, M Vilà , R Bommarco, S Elmendorf, P Beardsley 2004 Rapid evolution of an invasive plant. Ecol Monogr 74: 261-280.
58. Maynard Smith J, R Burian, S Kauffman, P Alberch, J Campbell, B Goodwin, R Lande, D Raup, L Wolfpert 1985 Developmental constraints on evolution. Q Rev Biol 60:265-287.
59. McGuigan K, MW Blows 2010 Asymmetry of genetic variation in fitness-related traits: Apparent stabilizing selection on gmax. Evolution 63:2838-2847.
60. Miller JR 2010 Survival of mutations arising during invasions. Evol Appl 3:109-121.
61. Mitchell-Olds T, RG Shaw 1987 Regression analysis of natural selection: Statistical inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41:1149-1161.
62. Montague JL, SCH Barrett, CG Eckert 2008 Re-establishment of clinal variation in flowering time among introduced populations of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria, Lythraceae). J Evol Biol 21: 234-245.
63. Müller-Schärer H, U Schaffner, T Steinger 2004 Evolution of invasive plants: Implications for biological control. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 417-422.
64. Nagy ES 1997 Selection for native characters in hybrids between two locally adapted plant subspecies. Evolution 51:1469-1480.
65. Nagy ES, KJ Rice 1997 Local adaptation in two subspecies of an annual plant: Implications for migration and gene flow. Evolution 51:1079-1089.
66. O'Neil P 1994 Genetic incompatibility and offspring quality in the tristylous plant Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae). Am J Bot 81:76-84.
67. - 1997 Natural selection on genetically correlated phenological characters in Lythrum salicaria L. (Lythraceae). Evolution 51:267-274.
68. - 1999 Selection on flowering time: An adaptive fitness surface for nonexistent character combinations. Ecology 80:806-820.
69. Parker IM, J Rodriguez, ME Loik 2003 An evolutionary approach to understanding the biology of invasions: Local adaptation and general-purpose genotypes in the weed Verbascum thapsus. Conserv Biol 17:59-72.
70. Richards CL, O Bossdorf, NZ Muth, J Gurevitch, M Pigliucci 2006 Jack of all trades, master of some? on the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecol Lett 9:981-993.
71. Roff DA, DJ Fairbairn 2007 The evolution of trade-offs: Where are we? J Evol Biol 20:433-447.
72. Ross CA, D Fauset, H Auge 2009 Mahonia invasions in different habitats: Local adaptation or general-purpose genotypes? Biol Invasions 11:441-452.
73. Rowe L, D Houle 1996 The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc R Soc B 263:1415-1421.
74. Scheiner SM 1993 Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 24:35-68.
75. Schemske DW 1984 Population structure and local selection in Impatiens pallida (Balsaminaceae), a selfing annual. Evolution 38: 817-832.
76. Schluter D 1988 Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42:849-861.
77. Shaw RG, CJ Geyer, S Wagenius, HH Hangelbroek, JR Etterson 2008 Unifying life-history analyses for inference of fitness and population growth. Am Nat 172:E35-E47.
78. Stearns SC 1976 Life-history tactics: A review of the ideas. Q Rev Biol 51:3-47.
79. Sultan SE, HG Spencer 2002 Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. Am Nat 160:271-283.
80. Thompson DQ, RL Stuckey, EB Thompson 1987 Spread, impact, and control of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North American wetlands. US Fish and Wildlife Service. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Online, Jamestown, ND. http://www npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/plants/loosstrf/index.htm.
81. Tufto J 2000 The evolution of plasticity and nonplastic spatial and temporal adaptations in the presence of imperfect environmental cues. Am Nat 156:121-130.
82. Turelli M, NH Barton 2004 Polygenic variation maintained by balancing selection: Pleiotropy, sex-dependent allelic effects and G 3 E interactions. Genetics 166:1053-1079.
83. van Kleunen M, JC Manning, V Pasqualetto, SD Johnson 2008 Phy-logenetically independent associations between autonomous selffertilization and plant invasiveness. Am Nat 171:195-201.
84. Via S, R Lande 1985 Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39:505-522.
85. Weber E, B Schmid 1998 Latitudinal population differentiation in two species of Solidago (Asteraceae) introduced into Europe. Am J Bot 85:1110-1121.
86. Williams DG, RN Mack, RA Black 1995 Ecophysiology of introduced Pennisetum setaceum on Hawaii: The role of phenotypic plasticity. Ecology 76:1569-1580.
87. Yakimowski SB, HA Hager, CG Eckert 2005 Limits and effects of invasion by the nonindigenous wetland plant Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife): A seed bank analysis. Biol Invasions 7:687-698.
88. Zhang XS, JLWang, WG Hill 2004 Influence of dominance, leptokurtosis and pleiotropy of deleterious mutations on quantitative genetic variation at mutation-selection balance. Genetics 166:597-610.