The relation of morphological awareness and syntactic awareness to adults' reading comprehension: Is vocabulary knowledge a mediating variable

Journal of Literacy Research

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 159-183

  Guo, Ying ^a   Roehrig, Alysia D ^b   Williams, Rihana S ^c  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c EMMANUEL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Morphology; Reading comprehension; Syntax; Vocabulary

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959222740     PISSN: 1086296X     EISSN: 15548430     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1086296X11403086     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Anderson, R. C.,and amp; Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77-117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
2. Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society of Research in Child Development, 58(10, Serial No. 238).
3. Berko, J, (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150-177.
4. Berninger, V., Nagy, W., Carlisle, J., Thomson, J., Hoffer, D., Abbott, S., Aylward, E. (2003). Effective treatment for dyslexics in Grades 4 to 6. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 382-417). Timonium, MD: New York Press.
5. Botzum, W. A. (1951). A factorial study of the reasoning and closure factors. Psychometrika, 16(4), 361-386.
6. Bowey, J. A. (1986). Syntactic awareness in relation to reading skill and ongoing reading comprehension monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41(2), 282-299.
7. Braze, D., Tabor, W., Shankweiler, D. P., & Mencl, W. E. (2007). Speaking up for vocabulary: Reading skill differences in young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(3), 227-243.
8. Brittain, M. M. (1970). Inflectional performance and early reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 6(1), 34-48.
9. Brown, J. I., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. (1993). Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Chicago, IL: Riverside.
10. Brown, W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 247-261). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189-209). Hillsdale, NJ;Erlbaum.
12. Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169-190.
13. Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24(3), 291-322.
14. Carlisle, J. F. (2007). Fostering morphological processing, vocabulary development, and reading comprehension. In R. K. Wagner, A. Muse, & K. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary development and its implications for reading comprehension (pp. 78-103). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
15. Carlisle, J. F., & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 239-253.
16. Carlisle, J. F., & Nomanbhoy, D. (1993). Phonological and morphological development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177-195.
17. Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2003). The effects of morphological structure on children's reading of derived words. In E. Assink & D. Santa (Eds.), Reading complex words: Crosslanguage studies. New York, NY: Kluwer.
18. Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1995). OWLS Listening Comprehension and Oral Expression Scale. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
19. Champion, A. (1997). Knowledge of suffixed words: A comparison of reading disable and nondisabled readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 47, 29-55.
20. Clark, E. V. (1995). The lexicon and syntax. In J. L. Miller & P. D. Eismas (Eds.), Speech, language and communication (pp. 303-337). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21. Clark, N. L. (1972). Hierarchical structure of comprehension skills (2 vols. Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia: A.C.E.R.
22. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Crosson, A. C., & Lesaux, N. K. (2009). Revisiting assumptions about the relationship of fluent reading to comprehension: Spanish-speakers' text-reading fluency in English. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 475-494.
24. Davis, F. B. (1944). Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading. Psychometrika, 9(3), 185-197.
25. Davis, F. B. (1968). Research in comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 3(4), 499-545.
26. Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just "more phonological"? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 223-238.
27. Dixon, P., LeFevre, J., & Twilley, L. (1988). Word knowledge and working memory as predictors of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 465-472.
28. Dreher, M. J., & Zenge, S. D. (1990). Using metalinguistic awareness in first grade to predict reading achievement in third and fifth grades. Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 13-21.
29. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
30. Feldt, R. C. (1988). Predicting academic performance: Nelson-Denny Reading Test and measures of college students' study of expository prose. Psychological Reports, 63, 579-582.
31. Flax, J., Realpe, T., Hirsch, L. S., & Nawyn, J. (2000, November). Relationship of language subtypes and literacy skills in families with a history of SLI. Poster presented at the conference of the American Speech, Language and Hearing Association, Washington, DC.
32. Freyd, P., & Baron, J. (1982). Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 282-295.
33. Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123(1), 71-99.
34. Gates, A. I., & MacGinitie, W. H. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Riverside.
35. Gelderen, A. V., Schoonen R., Glooper, K. D., Hulstijin, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M. (2004). Linguistic knowledge, processing speed, and metacognitive knowledge in first- and second-language reading comprehension: A componential analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 19-30.
36. Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. London, UK: Harvest Wheatsheaf.
37. Gottardo, A., Siegel, S. L., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). The assessment of adults with reading disabilities: What can we learn from experimental tasks. Journal of Research in Reading, 20, 42-54.
38. Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., & Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6-10.
40. Herriman, M. (1991). Metalinguistic development. Australian Journal of Reading, 14(4), 326-338.
41. Hill, M. M. (1996). What's in a word? Enhancing English vocabulary development by increasing learner awareness. In P. Storey, V. Berry, D. Bunton, & P. Hoare (Eds.), Issues in language in education (pp. 179-190). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education.
42. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127-160.
43. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
44. Johnston, A. M., Barnes, M. A., & Desrochers, A. (2008). Reading comprehension: Developmental processes, individual differences, and interventions. Canadian Psychology, 49(2), 125-132.
45. Kemp, N., Nillson, J., & Arciuli, J. (2009). Noun or verb? Adult readers' sensitivity to spelling cues to grammatical category in word endings. Reading and Writing, 22(6), 661-685.
46. Kennedy, D. K, & Weener, P. (1973). Visual and auditory training with the cloze procedure to improve reading and listening comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 8(4), 524-541.
47. Ku, Y., & Anderson, R. C. (2003). Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(5), 399-422.
48. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211-240.
49. Landi, N. (2009). An examination of the relationship between higher-order and lower-order reading subskills in adults. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 701-717.
50. Lavery, L., & Townsend, M. (1998). Computer-assisted instruction in teaching literacy skills to adults not in paid employment. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 33(2), 181-192.
51. Layton, A., Robinson, J., & Lawson, M. (1998). The relationship between syntactic awareness and reading performance. Journal of Research in Reading, 21(1), 5-23.
52. Leonard, L. B., Miller, C., & Gerber, E. (1990). Grammatical morphology and the lexicon in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 678-689.
53. Leong, C. K. (1989). Effects of morphological structure on reading proficiency: A developmental study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 357-379.
54. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test the significance of mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83-104.
55. Mahony, D. L. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 19-44.
56. Mahony, D. L., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 191-218.
57. Marsh, H. M. (1994). Using the National Longitudinal Study of 1988 to evaluate theoretical models of self-concept: The Self-Description Questionnaire. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 439-456.
58. Mattingly, I. (1972). Reading, the linguistic process, and linguistic awareness. In J. Kavanagh & I. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye (pp.133-147). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. McBride-Chang, C., Shu, H., Zhou, A., Wat, C.-P., & Wagner, R. K. (2003). Morphological awareness uniquely predicts young children's Chinese character recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 743-751.
60. Nagy, W. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In R. K. Wagner, A. Muse, & K. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary development and its implication for reading comprehension (pp. 52-77). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
61. Nagy, W., & Anderson, R. (1984). The number of words in printed school English. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304-330.
62. Nagy, W., Anderson, R., Schommer, M., Scott, J., & Stallman, A. (1989). Morphological families in the internal lexicon. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 262-282.
63. Nagy, W., Berninger, V.W., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 134-147.
64. Nagy, W., Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Vaughan, K., & Vermeulen, K. (2003). Relationship of morphology and other language skills to literacy skills in at-risk second-grade readers and at-risk fourth-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 730-742.
65. Nagy, W., Diakidoy, I., & Anderson, R. (1993). The acquisition of morphology: learning the contribution of suffixes to the meaning of derivatives. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(2), 155-170.
66. Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 269-284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67. National Institute of Childe Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network. (2005). Pathways to reading: The role of oral language in the transition to reading. Developmental Psychology, 41(2), 428-442.
68. Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Olsson, J. (2003). Learning morphological and phonological spelling rules: An intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 289-307.
69. Palmer, J., MacLeod, C. M., Hunt, E., & Davidson, J. E. (1985). Information processing correlates of reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 59-88.
70. Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis (LQH). In L. Verhoeven (Ed.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189-213).Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
71. Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2001). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.quantpsy.org
72. Proctor, C., Carlo, M., August, D., & Snow, C. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 9, 246-256.
73. Semel, E., Wiig, E., Secord, W., & Sabers, D. (1987). Clinical Evaluation of Language Functions- Revised: Technical manual. New York, NY: Psychological Corp.
74. Shaywitz, S.E. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. New York, NY: Knopf.
75. Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219-252.
76. Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1992). Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: the cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory & Cognition, 20(1), 51-68.
77. Stoltz, J. A., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 109-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
78. Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Word knowledge and reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 381-398.
79. Tunmer, W. E., Herriman, M. L., & Nesdale, A. R. (1988). Metalinguistic abilities and beginning reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(2), 134-158.
80. Tunmer, W. E., Nesdale, A. R., & Wright, A. D. (1987). Syntactic awareness and reading acquisition. British Journal of Development Psychology, 5, 25-34.
81. Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1990). Use of derivational morphology during reading. Cognition, 36(1), 17-34.
82. Vellutino, F. R (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83. Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 2-40.
84. Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. (2003). Introduction to this special issue: The role of morphology in learning to read. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 209-217.
85. Wallace, G., & Hammill, D. D. (2002). Comprehensive Receptive and Expressive Vocabulary Test (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
86. Weaver, P. A. (1979). Improving reading comprehension: Effects of sentence organization instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 15(1), 129-146.
87. Weiderholt, J. L., & Bryant, B. R. (2001). Gray Oral Reading Test, fourth edition (GORT-4). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
88. Williams, R. S., Ari, O., &Santamaria, C. (in press). Measuring post-secondary students' reading comprehension ability using cloze tests. Journal of Research in Reading
89. Wood, P. H. (1982). The Nelson-Denny Reading Test as a predictor of college of freshman grades. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42(2), 575-583.