Pragmatic power EUrope?

Cooperation and Conflict

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 242-261

  Wood, Steve ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

China; European Union; normative power; pragmatism; Russia

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958821045     PISSN: 00108367     EISSN: 14603691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010836711406420     Document Type: Article

References (130)

1. Aggestam L.Introduction: Ethical Power Europe?.International Affairs. 2008;84:1-11.
2. Albert M.,Kopp-Malek T.The Pragmatism of Global and European Forms of Governance: Emerging Forms of the Political 'beyond Westphalia'.Millennium. 2002;31:453-71.
3. Ambrosio T.Insulating Russia from a Colour Revolution: How the Kremlin Resists Regional Democratic Trends.Democratization. 2007;14:232-52.
4. International Report: The State of the World's Human Rights. London: Amnesty International; 2008:.
5. Anastasakis O.The EU's Political Conditionality in the Western Balkans: Towards a More Pragmatic Approach.Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 2008;8:365-77.
6. Aron L.After the Leviathan.Journal of Democracy. 2007;18:121-2.
7. Auswärtiges Amt (2007) Die EU und Zentralasien: Strategie für eine neue Partnerschaft (Berlin).
8. Author interview (2008a) Policy Unit, General Affairs Council (of the European Union), Brussels (June).
9. Author interview (2008b) Policy Unit, General Affairs Council (of the European Union), Brussels (June).
10. Author interview (2008c) European Commission, Brussels (June).
11. Author interview (2008d) Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels (June).
12. Avery G.,Howorth J.,Rijks D., et alBrussels: European Policy Centre; 2007:.
13. Baert P.Pragmatism in International Relations. Bauer H.Brighi E., ed. London: Routledge; 2009:47-64.
14. Balducci G.The Limits of Normative Power Europe in Asia: The Case of Human Rights in China.East Asia. 2010;27:35-55.
15. Baran Z.EU Energy Security: Time to End Russian Leverage.Washington Quarterly. 2007;30:131-44.
16. Barbé E.,Johansson-Nogué E.The EU as a Modest "Force for Good": The European Neighbourhood Policy.International Affairs. 2008;84:81-96.
17. Barbé E.,Kienzle B.Security Provider or Security Consumer? The European Union and Conflict Management.European Foreign Affairs Review. 2007;12:517-36.
18. Barkin S.Realist Constructivism.International Studies Review. 2003;5:325-42.
19. Barysch K.Pipelines, Politics and Power: The Future of EU-Russia Energy Relations. Brussels: Centre for European Reform; 2008:.
20. Pragmatism in International Relations. Bauer H.Brighi E., ed. London: Routledge; 2009:.
21. Beardsworth R.Cosmopolitanism and Realism: Towards Theoretical Convergence?.Millennium. 2008;37:69-96.
22. BTI 2010 - Russia Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann; 2009:.
23. Transformation Index. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann; 2006:.
24. Cardenas S.Norm Collision: Explaining the Effects of International Human Rights Pressure on State Behavior.International Studies Review. 2004;6:213-31.
25. Checkel J.International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist-Constructivist Divide.European Journal of International Relations. 1997;3:473-95.
26. Checkel J.Norms, Institutions and National Identity in Contemporary Europe.International Studies Quarterly. 1999;43:83-114.
27. Cochran M.Deweyan Pragmatism and Post-Positivist Social Science in IR.Millennium. 2002;31:525-48.
28. Cooper R.The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century. London: Atlantic; 2003:.
29. Cortell A.,Davis J.When Norms Clash: International Norms, Domestic Practices, and Japan's Internalisation of the GATT/WTO.Review of International Studies. 2005;31:3-25.
30. Memorandum of Understanding between the Council of Europe and the European Union. 117th Session of the Committee of Ministers; 2007Strasbourg; 2007.
31. Report on the EU Report on Human Rights. 2008;:.
32. Der Spiegel (2008) 'Schluss mit den Tändeleien!' Interview with German Foreign Minister, Frank-Walter Steinmeier (4August).
33. Dewey J.Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston; 1938:.
34. Dewey J.The Philosophy of John Dewey. McDermott J., ed. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press; 1981:.
35. Dickstein M.The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law and Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1998:.
36. Diez T.Constructing the Self and Changing Others: Reconsidering "Normative Power Europe".Millennium. 2005;33:613-36.
37. Diez T.,Manners I.Power in World Politics. Berenskoetter F.Williams M., ed. London: Routledge; 2007:173-88.
38. Duchêne F.Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead. Mayne R., ed. London: Fontana; 1972:32-47.
39. Dunne T.Good Citizen Europe.International Affairs. 2008;84 (1): 13-28.
40. The Elephant and the Bear Try Again: Options for a New Agreement Between the EU and Russia. Emerson M., ed. Brussels: CEPS; 2006:.
41. Erikson J.,Giacomello G.The Information Revolution, Security, and International Relations: (IR) Relevant Theory?.International Political Science Review.2006;27:221-44.
42. Etzioni A.Security First: For a Muscular, Moral Foreign Policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2007a:.
43. EtzioniA. (2007b) 'Democracy is Not a Suicide Pact', 7January. Available at: http//amitaietzioni.org/documents/A376DemocracyisNotaSuicidePact.doc; accessed 23 March 2009.
44. European Commission (2006) EU-China: Closer Partners, Growing ResponsibilitiesCOM(2006) 632 final (Brussels, 24October).
45. European Commission (2007a) An Energy Policy for EuropeCom(2007) 1 Final, 10January (Brussels).
46. European Commission (2007b) China: Strategy Paper 2007-2013 (Brussels).
47. European Commission (2008) Staff Working Document (vols I and II) accompanying the Second Energy Strategy. An Energy Security and Solidarity Action Plan - Europe's Current and Future Energy Position: Demand-Resources-InvestmentsCom(2008) 744 (Brussels).
48. European Commission (2010) http://ec.europa.eu/external_relations/russia/index_en.htm; accessed 21 January 2010.
49. EU Annual Report on Human Rights. Luxembourg: European Communities; 2007:.
50. Eurostat (2010) Energy dataavailable at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home.
51. Festenstein M.Pragmatism's Boundaries.Millennium. 2002;31:549-71.
52. FIDH (Fédération internationale des ligues des droits de l'homme) (2006) 'EU-Russia Consultations on Human Rights', 4th Round (November). Briefing Note. Paris: FIDH.
53. Flenley P.Russia and the EU: A Pragmatic and Contradictory Relationship.Perspectives on European Politics and Society. 2005;6:435-61.
54. Fox J.,Godemont F.A Power Audit of EU-China Relations. London: European Council on Foreign Relations; 2009:.
55. Gould H.,Onuf N.Pragmatism in International Relations. Bauer H.Brighi E., ed. London: Routledge; 2009:26-44.
56. Grant C.Is Europe Doomed to Fail as a Power?. Brussels: Centre for European Reform; 2009:.
57. Haack S.Pragmatism, Old and New.Contemporary Pragmatism. 2004;1:3-41.
58. Haas P.,Haas E.Pragmatic Constructivism and the Study of International Institutions.Millennium. 2002;31:573-601.
59. Haukkala H.Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs; 2008:.
60. Hellmann G.Creative Intelligence: Pragmatism as a Theory of Thought and Action. Paper prepared for the Millennium conference on 'Pragmatism in International Relations Theory'; 2002 London; 2002.
61. Are Dialogue and Synthesis Possible in International Relations?.International Studies Review. 2003;5:.
62. Hellmann G.Handbuch der Internationalen Politik. Masala C.Sauer F.Wilhelm A., ed. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2010:146-78.
63. Hettne B.,Söderbaum F.Civilian Power or Soft Imperialism? The EU as a Global Actor and the Role of Interregionalism.European Foreign Affairs Review. 2005;10:535-52.
64. Hill C.The Capability-Expectations Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe's International Role.Journal of Common Market Studies. 1993;31:305-28.
65. Holslag J.Brussels: Brussels Institute of Contemporary China Studies; 2010:.
66. World Report. New York: HRW; 2007:.
67. International Studies Review. Jackson P., ed. 2004:337-52.
68. James W.Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. London: Longmans, Green and Co; 1907:.
69. James W.The Meaning of Truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978 1909:.
70. Johnson J.Consequences of Positivism: A Pragmatist Assessment.Comparative Political Studies. 2006;39:224-52.
71. Jordan P.Does Membership Have Its Privileges?: Entrance into the Council of Europe and Compliance with Human Rights Norms.Human Rights Quarterly. 2003;25:660-88.
72. Jørgensen K.Three Doctrines on European Foreign Policy.Welt Trends. 2004;42:27-36.
73. JunckerJ.-C. (2006) Europarat - Europäische Union "Eine Einheitliche Zielstellung für den europäischen Kontinent". Report by the Prime Minster of Luxembourg (11April).
74. Jupille J.,Caporaso J.,Checkel J.Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union.Comparative Political Studies. 2003;36:7-40.
75. Khalif U.Ethical Dimensions of the Foreign Policy of the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008:.
76. Klitsounova E.Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies; 2008:.
77. Kononenko V.Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs; 2008:.
78. Kratochwil F.Of False Promises and Good Bets: A Plea for a Pragmatic Approach to Theory Building.International Journal of International Relations and Development. 2007;10:1-15.
79. Kratochwil F.Pragmatism in International Relations. Bauer H.Brighi E., ed. London: Routledge; 2009:11-25.
80. Krumm R.Zentralasien: Stabilität um jeden Preis.Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft. 2006;2:102-24.
81. Lupovici A.Constructivist Methods: A Plea and Manifesto for Pluralism.Review of International Studies. 2009;35:195-218.
82. Lynch D.What Russia Sees. Lynch D., ed. Paris: Institute for Security Studies; 2005:115-36.
83. Lynch D.Envisioning China's Political Future: Elite Reponses to Democracy as a Global Constitutive Norm.International Studies Quarterly. 2007;51:702-22.
84. Manners I.Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2002;40:235-58.
85. Manners I.Normative Power Europe Reconsidered: Beyond the Crossroads.Journal of European Public Policy. 2006a;13:182-99.
86. Manners I.European Union "Normative Power" and the Security Challenge.European Security. 2006b;15:405-21.
87. MannersI. (2009) 'The Concept of Normative Power in World Politics', DIIS Brief (May). Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Affairs.
88. MattlinM. (2010) 'A Normative EU Policy Towards China: Mission Impossible?' Working Paper 67. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
89. Millennium (2002) Editorial note. Special Issue on Pragmatism. Millennium 31: iii-iv.
90. Orttung R.Nations in Transit. New York: Freedom House; 2009:443-60.
91. Pierce C.Pragmatism as a Principle and Method of Right Thinking: The 1903 Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism. Turrisi P., ed. New York: Suny; 1997 1903:.
92. Rahr A.Die neue OPEC: Wie Russland zur globalen Energie-Supermacht werden will.Internationale Politik. 2006;61:15-23.
93. Rescher N.Pragmatism and Practical Rationality.Contemporary Pragmatism. 2004;1:43-60.
94. Rorty R.Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989:.
95. Rosamond B.Conceptualising the EU Model of Governance in World Politics.European Foreign Affairs Review. 2005;10:463-78.
96. RothM. (2009) 'Bilateral Disputes between EU Member States and Russia', CEPS Working Document 319/August, Brussels.
97. Rytövuori-Apunen H.Forget "Post-Positivist" IR!: The Legacy of IR Theory as the Locus for a Pragmatist Turn.Cooperation and Conflict. 2005;40:147-77.
98. SaariS. (2006) 'Human Rights Cooperation between Russia and European Intergovernmental Organizations: A One-Way Transference of Norms of a Mutual Process of Adaptation?' Working Paper 54. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
99. Sangiovanni M.Why a Common Foreign and Security Policy is Bad for Europe.Survival. 2003;45:193-206.
100. Scheipers S.,Sicurelli D.Normative Power Europe: A Credible Utopia?.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2007;45:435-57.
101. Schieder S.Pragmatism in International Relations. Bauer H.Brighi E., ed. London: Routledge; 2009:124-41.
102. Schimmelfennig F.The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003:.
103. Shannon V.Norms Are What States Make of Them. The Political Psychology of Norm Violation.International Studies Quarterly. 2000;44:293-316.
104. Shevtsova L.Russia's Ersatz Democracy.Current History. 2006;:307-14.
105. Sjursen H.The EU as a "Normative" Power: How Can This Be?.Journal of European Public Policy. 2006;13:235-51.
106. Smith K.Speaking with One Voice? European Union Co-ordination on Human Rights Issues at the United Nations.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2006;44:113-37.
107. Snyder J.,Vinjamuri L.Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice.International Security. 2003-4;28:5-44.
108. Spanger H.-J.HSFK Standpunkte 6. Hessische Stiftung für Friedens und Konfliktforschung: Hamburg; 2006:.
109. Splidsboel-Hansen F.Russia's Relations with the European Union: A Constructivist Cut.International Politics. 2002;39:399-421.
110. Staton J.,Vanberg G.The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions.American Journal of Political Science. 2008;52:504-19.
111. Sullivan M."That Dog Won't Hunt": The Cottage Industry of Realist Criticism, or Must You Play That Waltz Again?.Journal of International Relations and Development. 2005;8:327-54.
112. Tavits M.Principle vs. Pragmatism: Policy Shifts and Political Competition.American Journal of Political Science. 2007;51:151-65.
113. Who is a Normative Foreign Policy Actor? The European Union and its Global Partners. Tocci N., ed. Brussels: CEPS; 2008:.
114. Transparency International (2007) Annual Report (Berlin).
115. Treacher A.From Civilian Power to Military Power: The EU's Resistable Transformation.European Foreign Affairs Review. 2004;9:49-66.
116. Trenin D.Russia Leaves the West.Foreign Affairs. 2006;85:87-96.
117. Trenin D.Russia Redefines Itself and its Relations with the West.Washington Quarterly. 2007;30:96-105.
118. Umbach F.Europas nächster Kalter Krieg.Internationale Politik. 2006;61:6-14.
119. Wagnsson C.The EU as Strategic Actor, Pragmatic Re-actor, or Passive Pole?. Paper presented at the Third Pan-European Conference on EU Politics; 2006Istanbul; 2006.
120. Warkotsch A.Realpolitik and International Reaction to Non-Compliance with Liberal Democratic Norms: Comparing EU and US Response Patterns.Cooperation and Conflict. 2010;45:80-106.
121. Way L.Authoritarian State Building and the Sources of Competitiveness in the Fourth Wave: The Cases of Belarus, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine.World Politics. 2005;57:231-61.
122. Whitman R.From Civilian Power to Superpower? The International Identity of the European Union. London: Macmillan; 1998:.
123. Widmaier W.Theory as a Factor and the Theorist as an Actor: The "Pragmatic Constructivist" Lessons of John Dewey and John Kenneth Galbraith.International Studies Review. 2004;6:427-45.
124. Widmaier W.Constructing Foreign Policy Crises: Interpretive Leadership in the Cold War and War on Terrorism.International Studies Quarterly. 2007;51:779-94.
125. Wood S.Energy Security, Normative Dilemmas, and Institutional Camouflage: Europe's Pragmatism.Politics and Policy. 2009;37:611-35.
126. Wong R.National University of Singapore; 2005:.
127. Youngs R.Normative Dynamics and Strategic Interests in the EU's External Identity.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2004;42:415-35.
128. Youngs R.Comment. Madrid: FRIDE; 2007:.
129. Zimmermann H.Realist Power Europe? The EU in the Negotiations about China's and Russia's WTO Accession.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2007;45:813-32.
130. Zimmermann H.How the EU Negotiates Trade and Democracy: The Cases of China's Accession to the WTO and the Doha Round.European Foreign Affairs Review. 2008;13:255-80.