Corneal biomechanical properties measured with the Ocular Response Analyser in a myopic population

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 404-412

  Plakitsi, Athina ^a   O'Donnell, Clare ^b   A Miranda, Marco ^b   Charman, W Neil ^b   Radhakrishnan, Hema ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST ATTICA   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Corneal biomechanics; Corneal hysteresis; Corneal resistance factor; Corneal thickness; Intraocular pressure; Ocular response analyser

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORNEA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; MYOPIA; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REFRACTION ERROR; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; CORNEA; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; REFRACTIVE ERRORS;

EID: 79958803193     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: 14751313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00852.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Wildsoet C. Structural correlates of myopia. In: Myopia and Nearwork (Rosenfield M & Gilmartin B, editors), Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, 1998; pp. 31-56.
2. Lin LL, Shih YF, Tsai CB et al. Epidemiologic study of ocular refraction among schoolchildren in Taiwan in 1995. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: 275-281.
3. Phillips JR & McBrien NA. Form deprivation myopia: elastic properties of sclera. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1995; 15: 357-362.
4. McBrien NA, Jobling AI & Gentle A. Biomechanics of the sclera in myopia: extracellular and cellular factors. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: E23-E30.
5. Avetisov ES, Savitskaya NF, Vinetskaya MI et al. A study of biochemical and biomechanical qualities of normal and myopic eye sclera in humans of different age groups. Metab Pediatr Syst Ophthalmol 1983; 7: 183-188.
6. Cho P & Lam C. Factors affecting the central corneal thickness of Hong Kong-Chinese. Curr Eye Res 1999; 18: 368-374.
7. Fam HB, How AC, Baskaran M et al. Central corneal thickness and its relationship to myopia in Chinese adults. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 1451-1453.
8. Zadnik K, Mutti D, Friedman N et al. Initial cross-sectional results from the Orinda longitudinal study of myopia. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 750-758.
9. Chang SW, Tsai IL, Hu FR, Lin LL & Shih YF. The cornea in young myopic adults. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 916-920.
10. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 156-162.
11. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I & Mantry S. The use of the Reichert Ocular Response Analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006; 29: 257-262.
12. Chang PY, Chang SW & Wang JY. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure with Ocular Response Analyzer in childhood myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 877-881.
13. Lim L, Gazzard G, Chan YH et al. Cornea biomechanical characteristics and their correlates with refractive error in Singaporean children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 3852-3857.
14. Shen M, Fan F, Xue A et al. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in high myopia. Vision Res 2008; 48: 2167-2171.
15. Song Y, Congdon N, Li L et al. Corneal hysteresis and axial length among Chinese secondary school children: The Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study (X-PRES) Report No. 4. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 145: 819-826.
16. Kotecha A. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? Surv Ophthalmol 2007; 52 (Suppl 2): S109-S114.
17. Kopito R, Gaujoux T, Montard R et al. Reproducibility of viscoelastic property and intraocular pressure measurements obtained with the Ocular Response Analyzer. Acta Ophthalmol 2010; 89: e225-e230.
18. Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Queiros A, Jorge J, Diaz-Rey A & Parafita MA. Intraoffice variability of corneal biomechanical parameters and intraocular pressure (IOP). Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 457-462.
19. Moreno-Montanes J, Maldonado M, Garcia N et al. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the Ocular Response Analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 968-974.
20. Lu F, Xu S, Qu J et al. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis during corneal swelling induced by contact lens wear with eye closure. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 616-622.
21. David R, Zangwill L, Briscoe D, Dagan M, Yagev R & Yassur Y. Diurnal intraocular pressure variations: an analysis of 690 diurnal curves. Br J Ophthalmol 1992; 76: 280-283.
22. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H & Garway-Heath DF. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 5337-5347.
23. Amano S, Honda N, Amano Y et al. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by rotating Scheimpflug camera, ultrasonic pachymetry, and scanning-slit corneal topography. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 937-941.
24. Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, Funovics MA & Skorpik C. Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 892-899.
25. Buehl W, Stojanac D, Sacu S, Drexler W & Findl O. Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141: 7-12.
26. Bourges JL, Alfonsi N & Laliberté JF et al. Average 3-dimensional models for the comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam pachymetry maps in normal corneas. Ophthamology 2009; 116: 2064-2071.
27. Grossniklaus HE & Green WR. Pathologic findings in pathologic myopia. Retina 1992; 12: 127-133.
28. Franco S & Lira M. Biomechanical properties of the cornea measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer and their association with intraocular pressure and the central corneal curvature. Clin Exp Optom 2009; 92: 469-475.
29. Edwards MH & Brown B. Intraocular pressure in a selected sample of myopic and nonmyopic Chinese children. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 15-17.
30. Edwards MH & Brown B. IOP in myopic children: the relationship between increases in IOP and the development of myopia. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1996; 16: 243-246.
31. Schmid KL, Hills T, Abbott M, Humphries M, Pyne K & Wildsoet CF. Relationship between intraocular pressure and eye growth in chick. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2003; 23: 25-33.
32. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover D & Quigley HA. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141: 868-875.
33. Klein BE, Klein R & Linton KL. Intraocular pressure in an American community. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33: 2224-2228.
34. Mitchell P, Hourihan F & Sandbach J et al. The relationship between glaucoma and myopia: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 2010-2015.
35. Wong TY, Klein BE, Klein R, Knudtson M & Lee KE. Refractive errors, intraocular pressure, and glaucoma in a white population. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 211-217.
36. Goss DA & Caffey TW. Clinical findings before the onset of myopia in youth: 5. Intraocular pressure. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: 286-291.
37. Lee AJ, Saw SM, Gazzard G, Chang A & Tan DT. Intraocular pressure associations with refractive error and axial length in children. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88: 5-7.
38. Manny RE, Deng L, Crossnoe C & Gwiazda J. IOP, myopic progression and axial length in a COMET subgroup. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 97-105.
39. Puell-Marin MC, Romero-Martin M & Dominguez-Carmona M. Intraocular pressure in 528 university students: effect of refractive error. J Am Optom Assoc 1997; 68: 657-662.
40. Dupps WJ, Salomao MQ & Ambrosio R (eds). In: Keratoconus and Keratoectasia: Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment. Chapter 2. Slack Inc: Thorofare, NJ, 2010.