University-industry research collaboration: A model to assess university capability

Higher Education

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 163-181

  Abramo, Giovanni ^a,b   D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ^a   Costa, Flavia Di ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Co authorship; Geographical proximity; Italy; Star scientist; University industry collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958741775     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-010-9372-0     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abramo, G. (2007). Il trasferimento tecnologico pubblico-privato: un'analisi integrata del sistema Italia. Rivista di Politica Economica, 3-4, 45-86.
2. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2008). Assessment of sectoral aggregation distortion in research productivity measurements. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 111-121. 10. 3152/095820208X280916.
3. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009a). The contribution of star scientists to overall sex differences in research productivity. Scientometrics, 81(1), 137-156. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-008-2131-7.
4. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., Di Costa, F., & Solazzi, M. (2009b). University-industry collaboration: A bibliometric examination. Technovation, 29(6-7), 498-507. doi: 10. 1016/j. technovation. 2008. 11. 003.
5. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., Di Costa, F., Solazzi, M. (2009c). The role of information asymmetry in the market of university-industry research collaboration. The Journal of Technology Transfer. doi: 10. 1007/s10961-009-9131-5.
6. Anselin, L. (1998). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
7. Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. J. (2000). Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papers in Regional Science, 79(4), 435-443.
8. Arundel, A., & Geuna, A. (2004). Proximity and use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(6), 559-580.
9. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R& D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630-640.
10. Balconi, M., & Laboranti, A. (2006). University-industry interactions in applied research: The case of microelectronics. Research Policy, 35(10), 1616-1630.
11. Barnes, T., Pashby, I., & Gibbons, A. (2002). Effective University- industry interaction: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative R& D projects. European Management Journal, 20(3), 272-285.
12. Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74.
13. Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4), 627-655.
14. Carlino, J. (2001). Knowledge spillovers: Cities' role in the New Economy. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review, 4, 17-26.
15. Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M., & Braczyk, H. (2004). Regional innovation systems (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
16. D'Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313.
17. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The endless transition: A "triple helix" of university-industry-government relations. Minerva, 36(3), 203-208.
18. Fingleton, B., & López-Bazo, E. (2006). Empirical growth models with spatial effects. Papers in Regional Science, 85(2), 171-198.
19. Fontana, R., Geuna, A., & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university-industry R& D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35(2), 309-323.
20. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
21. Gallino, L. (2003). La scomparsa dell'Italia industriale. Torino: Einaudi.
22. Glaeser, E., Kallal, H., Scheinkman, J., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1126-1153.
23. Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79(5), 957-970.
24. Jaffe, A. B., Henderson, R., & Trajtenberg, M. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-598.
25. Katz, J. S. (1994). Geographic proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 31(1), 31-43.
26. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
27. Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3-15.
28. Lee, J., & Mansfield, E. (1996). The modern university: Contributor to modern innovation and recipient of industrial R& D support. Research Policy, 25(7), 1047-1058.
29. Lindelof, P., & Lofsten, H. (2004). Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: University-industry links for technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3), 311-326.
30. Lundberg, J., Tomson, G., Lundkvist, I., Skar, J., & Brommels, M. (2006). Collaboration uncovered: Exploring the adequacy of measuring university-industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding. Scientometrics, 69(3), 575-589.
31. Lundvall, B. Å. (Ed.). (1992). National innovation systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
32. Manjarrés-Henri{dotless}quez, L., Gutierrez-Gracia, A., Carrion-Garcia, A., & Vega-Jurado, J. (2009). The effects of university-industry relationships and academic research on scientific performance: Synergy or substitution? Research in Higher Education, 50(8), 795-811.
33. Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363-367.
34. Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: University-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835-851.
35. Moed, H. F., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (1996). Impact factors can mislead. Nature, 381, 186.
36. Muscio, A. (2010). What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? Evidence from Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(2), 181-202.
37. Nelson, R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems. A comparative analysis. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. OECD. (2007). OECD science, technology and industry scoreboard 2007. ISBN 978-92-64-03788-5.
39. Ponds, R., van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in regional science, 86(3), 423-443.
40. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
41. Prabhu, G. N. (1999). Implementing university-industry joint product innovation projects. Technovation, 19(8), 495-505.
42. Segarra-Blasco, A., & Arauzo-Carod, J. M. (2008). Sources of innovation and industry-university interaction: Evidence from Spanish firms. Research Policy, 37(8), 1283-1295.
43. Tijssen, R. J. W. (2004). Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge? Global trends in the output of corporate research articles. Research Policy, 33(5), 709-733.
44. van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: Towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33(3), 425-441.
45. Weingart, P. (2005). Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics, 62(1), 117-131.